Guest Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 Turbo normalization is an abbreviation of Turbocharged nomalization. If the turbo isn't charging, it isn't a turbocharger. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted March 7 Author Share Posted March 7 2 minutes ago, HSR said: Turbo normalization is an abbreviation of Turbocharged nomalization. If the turbo isn't charging, it isn't a turbocharger. No , it’s not Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mnstang Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 I just want to know does the airplane take off from the treadmill or not Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 Show me a link to this and quit Turbocharged has a specific definition and that means it makes a pressure above 1 atmosphere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crnr2Crnr Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 37 minutes ago, f7ben said: Tell me how a two stroke with an expansion chamber dictating rpm range relates to a 4 stroke turbo that is happy anywhere from 7500-9000 rpm Are you seriously fucking retarded? right after you apologize to Tom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted March 7 Author Share Posted March 7 1 minute ago, Crnr2Crnr said: right after you apologize to Tom As soon as Tom admits he was wrong I will apologize to him. It hacked me off he wouldn’t say a word about Glen Halls tune because he knows who pays his bills and what Glen Hall meant to the sport. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 8 minutes ago, f7ben said: No , it’s not What is the difference between a turbo nomalizer and a turbocharger mechanically? Are they very similar systems or TOTALLY different?? Do they both boost the engines intake pressure or not? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 Aviation engines are also built/designed to make XXXhp and not a single hp more, hence why that system is used, they could very easily be changed to make more than designed hp but only an idiot pilot like yourself would be the pioneer of that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 1 hour ago, f7ben said: Wrong Why do you insist on overcomplicating a very simple concept? It doesn’t make you any smarter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted March 7 Author Share Posted March 7 2 minutes ago, ActionfigureJoe said: Why do you insist on overcomplicating a very simple concept? It doesn’t make you any smarter. Turbo normalized and turbo charged are two different things Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted March 7 Author Share Posted March 7 9 minutes ago, HSR said: Aviation engines are also built/designed to make XXXhp and not a single hp more, hence why that system is used, they could very easily be changed to make more than designed hp but only an idiot pilot like yourself would be the pioneer of that. Incorrect , there are faa approved aftermarket systems that both normalize and turbocharge. Two very different things. If you knew anything about aviation it takes a decade to get any modification approved for general aviation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted March 7 Author Share Posted March 7 14 minutes ago, HSR said: What is the difference between a turbo nomalizer and a turbocharger mechanically? Are they very similar systems or TOTALLY different?? Do they both boost the engines intake pressure or not? They can be similar or different and they certainly provide some of the same function. The distinction lies in whether the system increases rated power or maintains is. Not hard to understand Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awful knawful Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 43 minutes ago, HSR said: Still nothin And the turbo is adding boost to make power. / Thread Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 Turbochargers were first adopted to diesel engines. Not aircraft. Used for ships and locomotives. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted March 7 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 7 15 hours ago, f7ben said: Nope , he’s dumb as fuck FFS Ben. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 17 minutes ago, f7ben said: Turbo normalized and turbo charged are two different things In either application the concept remains the same. Compensating for less oxygen due to lower atmospheric pressure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awful knawful Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 13 minutes ago, f7ben said: They can be similar or different and they certainly provide some of the same function. The distinction lies in whether the system increases rated power or maintains is. Not hard to understand You should be a politician. You say a lot of words that explain nothing, you lie and you believe your own lies. A true inbred know nothing retard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted March 7 Author Share Posted March 7 Just now, ActionfigureJoe said: In either application the concept remains the same. Compensating for less oxygen due to lower atmospheric pressure. No , increasing rates hp is different than maintaining rated hp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted March 7 Author Share Posted March 7 1 minute ago, Highmark said: FFS Ben. The dude is a retarded asshole Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted March 7 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 7 Just now, f7ben said: The dude is a retarded asshole SMH....and what are you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awful knawful Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 3 minutes ago, ActionfigureJoe said: Turbochargers were first adopted to diesel engines. Not aircraft. Used for ships and locomotives. Oh oh. First crack in the foundation of lies. Knowing Ben it has a wood foundation. What a fag! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted March 7 Author Share Posted March 7 1 minute ago, Highmark said: SMH....and what are you? Obviously also a retarded asshole lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted March 7 Author Share Posted March 7 1 minute ago, awful knawful said: Oh oh. First crack in the foundation of lies. Knowing Ben it has a wood foundation. What a fag! V12 Liberty airplane The first turbochargers were not applied to marine or automotive: they were applied to airplanes. Around 1918, The GE engineer, Sanford Alexander Moss, applied a turbocharger to a V12 Liberty airplane and subsequently turbocharging was applied to many American airplanes[1]. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted March 7 Author Share Posted March 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awful knawful Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 What if the turbo can't maintain sea level HP? What's that called? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.