ArcticCrusher Posted January 8 Share Posted January 8 (edited) 4 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: How’s it going Fauci cock gobbler? Neal This was pointed out early in 2020 via FOI's, they knew it worked but here we have a thread that the retards were duped. Brainwashing in real time. Get another booster tested on 8 rats, it saved over 20 million lives. Edited January 8 by ArcticCrusher 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted January 8 Share Posted January 8 3 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: This was pointed out early in 2020 via FOI's, they knew it worked but here we have a thread that the retards were duped. Brainwashing in real time. Get another booster tested on 8 rats, it saved over 20 million lives. All I hear is gargle gargle gargle, can you speak up??? Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Steve753 Posted January 8 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 8 1 hour ago, ArcticCrusher said: Total bullshit. It worked fine for the first sars. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/ That's not Hydroxychloroquine though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 8 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 8 8 minutes ago, Steve753 said: That's not Hydroxychloroquine though. Splitting hairs. Is hydroxychloroquine the same as chloroquine? by Health Desk | Published on August 3, 2020 – Updated on August 4, 2020 | Explainer What our experts say Chloroquine is a medication that is taken to prevent or treat malaria, which is transmitted by mosquitoes bites. It's also used to treat some intestinal infections. On the other hand, hydroxychloroquine is a medication that is also taken to prevent and treat malaria, but it can also treat other diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis or lupus. Both of these medications are antimalarials, but hydroxychloroquine is a newer, slightly altered version of chloroquine that has fewer side effects and dissolves more easily in the body, so it is often considered a safer medication for patients to take. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 8 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 8 No matter what anyone says once the decision and more importantly the money was spent on developing the vaccine and given its EAU nothing with remote chance of being effective was given much of chance. It would have canceled the jabs EAU. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Steve753 Posted January 8 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 8 3 minutes ago, Highmark said: Splitting hairs. Is hydroxychloroquine the same as chloroquine? by Health Desk | Published on August 3, 2020 – Updated on August 4, 2020 | Explainer What our experts say Chloroquine is a medication that is taken to prevent or treat malaria, which is transmitted by mosquitoes bites. It's also used to treat some intestinal infections. On the other hand, hydroxychloroquine is a medication that is also taken to prevent and treat malaria, but it can also treat other diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis or lupus. Both of these medications are antimalarials, but hydroxychloroquine is a newer, slightly altered version of chloroquine that has fewer side effects and dissolves more easily in the body, so it is often considered a safer medication for patients to take. No mention of viruses regardless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Steve753 Posted January 8 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 8 1 minute ago, Highmark said: No matter what anyone says once the decision and more importantly the money was spent on developing the vaccine and given its EAU nothing with remote chance of being effective was given much of chance. It would have canceled the jabs EAU. Well thats not entirely true. Both India and Japan tried Hydroxychloroquine and it just didn't work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 8 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 8 1 minute ago, Steve753 said: Well thats not entirely true. Both India and Japan tried Hydroxychloroquine and it just didn't work. Does US EAU of a treatment carry to those countries? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 8 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 8 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Steve753 said: No mention of viruses regardless. Huh? SARS COV 1 and MERS were reportedly very similar to the SARS COV 2 COVID virus. In the beginning its the only thing they had to work with. Edited January 8 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted January 8 Share Posted January 8 20 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: All I hear is gargle gargle gargle, can you speak up??? Neal That's the vax speaking to you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 8 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 8 (edited) 11 minutes ago, Steve753 said: Well thats not entirely true. Both India and Japan tried Hydroxychloroquine and it just didn't work. Studies were all over the map. This one overall showed positive results. Reality is this....if the CDC admitted existing successful treatment the jab could not get EAU and was months if not years away from approval. That is not hyperbole....that is fact. I can show you video of Fauci saying how long it takes for vaccine approval of this nature. They just so happened to say they needed a pandemic to convince the public of its usefulness. That's fucked up. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7534595/ A total of 43 reports were found that examined HCQ treatment for COVID-19 patients. Twenty-five reported positive clinical efficacy from providing HCQ to for COVID-19 patients; 15 showed no improvement with HCQ and three showed worse clinical results in patients who received HCQ. Edited January 8 by Highmark 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted January 8 Share Posted January 8 5 minutes ago, Steve753 said: Well thats not entirely true. Both India and Japan tried Hydroxychloroquine and it just didn't work. Those were lies the msm repeated to you. Once you are out of the Matrix you see a whole other world. Just like covid came from a wet market. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted January 8 Share Posted January 8 12 minutes ago, Highmark said: No matter what anyone says once the decision and more importantly the money was spent on developing the vaccine and given its EAU nothing with remote chance of being effective was given much of chance. It would have canceled the jabs EAU. Any country could have used it and skipped the 'BS.' 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 8 Share Posted January 8 13 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: Those were lies the msm repeated to you. Once you are out of the Matrix you see a whole other world. Just like covid came from a wet market. Car bomb, Soros ???? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member Stephen Hawking Posted January 8 Gold Member Share Posted January 8 This thread has legs already. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted January 8 Share Posted January 8 4 minutes ago, HSR said: Car bomb, Soros ???? The vax saved 20 million lives. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted January 8 Share Posted January 8 Just now, ArcticCrusher said: The vax saved 20 million lives. The vaxxx killed 17 million people 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted January 8 Share Posted January 8 3 minutes ago, akvanden said: The vaxxx killed 17 million people You can actually add up those bodies. But 20 million, the curve you believed without evidence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 8 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 8 Well I don't see significant portions of the population running to get the covid vaccine now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member Stephen Hawking Posted January 8 Gold Member Share Posted January 8 1 minute ago, Highmark said: Well I don't see significant portions of the population running to get the covid vaccine now. That's because AC is spreading the word. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted January 8 Share Posted January 8 3 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: You can actually add up those bodies. No you can't. Nice graph. Your savior said it was even more. “I think if we didn’t come up during the Trump administration with the vaccine, you could have 100 million people dead, just like you had in 1917,” Trump said in an interview on Fox News that aired Saturday night." Is he wrong?!? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted January 8 Share Posted January 8 39 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: That's the vax speaking to you. You sound like a batshitty crazed denier. More gargle gargle!!! Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted January 8 Share Posted January 8 9 minutes ago, Highmark said: Well I don't see significant portions of the population running to get the covid vaccine now. Only the really stupid are still taking any. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted January 8 Share Posted January 8 4 minutes ago, akvanden said: No you can't. Nice graph. Your savior said it was even more. “I think if we didn’t come up during the Trump administration with the vaccine, you could have 100 million people dead, just like you had in 1917,” Trump said in an interview on Fox News that aired Saturday night." Is he wrong?!? 20 million would have died, your words. Just look at the excess deaths. Those are people you can actually count. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted January 8 Share Posted January 8 11 minutes ago, Highmark said: Well I don't see significant portions of the population running to get the covid vaccine now. Nor HCQ or IVM. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.