Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Anonymous….


Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, Kivalo said:

release the evidence or fuck off

I disagree....just fuck off. Nobody should have their privacy hacked for the amusement of others. Plus I would hate to read snowflakes browser history (chills)

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
55 minutes ago, Kivalo said:

release the evidence or fuck off

Anonymous:lol:.... Just like all the "anonymous" sources that had evidence of Russia collusion.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Gold Member
34 minutes ago, SkisNH said:

I disagree....just fuck off. Nobody should have their privacy hacked for the amusement of others. Plus I would hate to read snowflakes browser history (chills)

That's a good point.

Revised statement: If its illegal then release the evidence, otherwise fuck off.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member

Yeah....sounds like invasion of privacy to the max....the OP has no problem with this at all. I could care less what anyone looks at or does on their own time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ViperGTS/Z1 said:

Yeah....sounds like invasion of privacy to the max....the OP has no problem with this at all. I could care less what anyone looks at or does on their own time.

To leftists the ends justify the means....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
1 hour ago, ViperGTS/Z1 said:

Yeah....sounds like invasion of privacy to the max....the OP has no problem with this at all. I could care less what anyone looks at or does on their own time.

I don’t give two fucks what Clarence jacks off to.  But he’s been a right wing shill bought and paid for by billionaires while masquerading as a religious do-gooder.  Maybe that’s the case or maybe not :snack:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, SnowRider said:

I don’t give two fucks what Clarence jacks off to.  But he’s been a right wing shill bought and paid for by billionaires while masquerading as a religious do-gooder.  Maybe that’s the case or maybe not :snack:

No evidence that any case or ruling had been influenced. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SnowRider said:

:lol: Sure - you know that already :lmao: 

I do...Thomas rulings are pretty consistent.  He is an originalist...He rules based on. What the constitution says, not what you want it to say. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
54 minutes ago, SkisNH said:

I do...Thomas rulings are pretty consistent.  He is an originalist...He rules based on. What the constitution says, not what you want it to say. 

An originalist :lol:  He’s an activist :thumbsup: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SnowRider said:

An originalist :lol:  He’s an activist :thumbsup: 

Have you read the constitution?  It's only about 14 pages....give it a good read, it's well thought out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SnowRider said:

I don’t give two fucks what Clarence jacks off to.  But he’s been a right wing shill bought and paid for by billionaires while masquerading as a religious do-gooder.  Maybe that’s the case or maybe not :snack:

So oblivious. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol



×
×
  • Create New...