Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

The great global warming swindle.


Recommended Posts

  • Platinum Contributing Member

:news:

26 min mark. 

https://www.cnet.com/science/space/suns-upcoming-peak-of-sunspot-and-solar-flare-activity-could-set-records/#:~:text=The first half of 2022,more active solar cycle peak.

The first half of 2022 saw sunspot and solar flare activity on the sun increase significantly, including some of the most powerful flares seen in several years. With the predicted maximum still a few years off, it seems that things are trending toward the McIntosh prediction of a more active solar cycle peak.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member

13:20-18 min mark talks about where GH gases should warm the atmosphere (troposphere) yet this is not occurring.

Warming is occurring from the sun as well as from under the ground.

If you watch this with an open mind you cannot possibly believe what we are being told about MM CO2. 

Edited by Highmark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Highmark said:

13:20 min mark talks about where GH gases should warm the atmosphere (troposphere) yet this is not occurring.

Is that because they’re taking their readings for global warming just over heat islands 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
31 minutes ago, ACE said:

Is that because they’re taking their readings for global warming just over heat islands 

Its about understanding the GH effect and where warming should occur.   If its the GH effect the troposphere should have been warming and its not or wasn't when the documentary was filmed.  It shows other reasons we are warming that doesn't have anything to do with MM CO2 and why historically temp increases before CO2 does. 

Edited by Highmark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
34 minutes ago, Plissken said:

Dude that's 43 years after your graph shows them separate.  :lol:  

Interesting where you can see spikes from significant volcanic eruptions. 

https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/33/19/jcliD190998.xml

full-jcliD190998-f3.jpg

Edited by Highmark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Highmark said:

Dude that's 43 years after your graph shows them separate.  :lol:  

Interesting where you can see spikes from significant volcanic eruptions. 

https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/33/19/jcliD190998.xml

full-jcliD190998-f3.jpg


Here’s the irradiance data going back 400 years.  Despite the 11 year cyclical oscillations, it’s basically about the same average.  

E14018DB-52A0-47A6-BD41-2BB4E4363D2C.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Highmark said:

From your 19 year old link:

Although the inferred increase of solar irradiance in 24 years, about 0.1 percent, is not enough to cause notable climate change, the trend would be important if maintained for a century or more.


Obviously, we now know that trend didn’t occur.  I’ll keep an eye on solar cycle 25, be interesting to see if it surpasses 1960.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ArcticCrusher said:

Anyone remember the video of Potato Head and the former owner of the weather network where he scolded the ignorance of the climate cult and said this was a scam started by the dems.

 

The climate cult thanks you for supporting them financially.

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Gold Member
1 hour ago, akvanden said:

The climate cult thanks you for supporting them financially.

You are actually in the climate cult. And we all support them financially its called the EPA . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, akvanden said:

The climate cult thanks you for supporting them financially.

 

6 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

Do I need to school you on investing as well?

 

This what a insiders do before they leave it to the bagholders.

 

https://www.secform4.com/insider-trading/1682852.htm

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, EvilBird said:

You are actually in the climate cult. And we all support them financially its called the EPA . 

No actually I don’t have any direct investments like AC.

 

20 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

Do I need to school you on investing as well?

 

Please do.

:pc:

 

”Private, institutional-quality real estate and
clean energy investments.”

Even if you requested to only be in the real estate side, your mgmt fees are complicit in supporting their vision.

 

 

Putting your money where your mouth is. 
:bc:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, akvanden said:

No actually I don’t have any direct investments like AC.

 

Please do.

:pc:

 

”Private, institutional-quality real estate and
clean energy investments.”

Even if you requested to only be in the real estate side, your mgmt fees are complicit in supporting their vision.

 

 

Putting your money where your mouth is. 
:bc:

You need to be an accredited investor first for private equity.  It's above your paygrade.  You need to start at the bottom.

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...