motonoggin Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 18 minutes ago, Highmark said: No fear of them getting jobs. Just want a strong economy caused by natural market forces. Better ask Santa for a unicorn instead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 19 minutes ago, motonoggin said: Better ask Santa for a unicorn instead. Like you utopian society ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted February 11, 2017 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted February 11, 2017 (edited) 2 hours ago, motonoggin said: Better ask Santa for a unicorn instead. That's priceless coming from a guy who thinks the US will become a communist society without govt authority, a monetary policy, police, military and we all will start and end our days holding hands singing Kumbaya together. Oh and lets not forget the free drugs and yachts to share! Edited February 11, 2017 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 If this is a slam dunk to get overturned at the SC, why is the EO getting rewritten just like I suggested a couple days ago? Anyone, anyone....? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 2 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said: If this is a slam dunk to get overturned at the SC, why is the EO getting rewritten just like I suggested a couple days ago? Anyone, anyone....? The 9th got it WRONG! And the SC will overturn it. However, this is brilliant. Any terrorist action in the US can now be laid at the feet of the Dems no matter the who/how/why or where from. BRILLIANT!!!!! And now, all that needs to be done is take out what the court identified as "faulty" and PRESTO.....done. With zero opposition. Well, other than the usual whining, crying and dancing in the streets by the protesters. But that's all good....nobody cares anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 11 minutes ago, Zambroski said: The 9th got it WRONG! And the SC will overturn it. However, this is brilliant. Any terrorist action in the US can now be laid at the feet of the Dems no matter the who/how/why or where from. BRILLIANT!!!!! And now, all that needs to be done is take out what the court identified as "faulty" and PRESTO.....done. With zero opposition. Well, other than the usual whining, crying and dancing in the streets by the protesters. But that's all good....nobody cares anymore. All the courts have got it wrong so far I guess. Even the Republican appointed judges on those courts. President Trump 0-4 with the judiciary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 Just now, ICEMAN! said: All the courts have got it wrong so far I guess. Even the Republican appointed judges on those courts. President Trump 0-4 with the judiciary. Yes, I think they do. They can interpret it anyway they want (and they did), but ultimately, the President has always possessed that kind of power. But like I said, it's all brilliant. Dems played like a fiddle. Again...and again...and again. SO...what happens if we have another terrorist attack...and again, it doesn't matter the specifics at all. Let me give you a hint. 2018 Dems will easily lose 1/2 to 3/4 of their remaining seats. Winning! It's what Trump does. SBYL. And again...why the fuck do you care so much? Kinda pathetic isn't it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted February 11, 2017 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted February 11, 2017 2 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said: All the courts have got it wrong so far I guess. Even the Republican appointed judges on those courts. President Trump 0-4 with the judiciary. Wrong. Better do your research better. A federal judge in Boston on Friday decided not to extend a temporary restraining order against President Trump's controversial immigration executive order. That means the current seven-day injunction, which was granted Jan. 29, expires just before 2 a.m. Sunday, according to the plaintiffs' lawyers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted February 11, 2017 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted February 11, 2017 22 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said: If this is a slam dunk to get overturned at the SC, why is the EO getting rewritten just like I suggested a couple days ago? Anyone, anyone....? The only part in question was the legal visa holders who already had been to the US. The admin said they were not a part of the ban (albeit they did not say this immediately) but did say this later. If re-written this might be the only change. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 17 minutes ago, Highmark said: Wrong. Better do your research better. A federal judge in Boston on Friday decided not to extend a temporary restraining order against President Trump's controversial immigration executive order. That means the current seven-day injunction, which was granted Jan. 29, expires just before 2 a.m. Sunday, according to the plaintiffs' lawyers. Nope "The appeals court ruling means that visa holders from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen can continue to enter the US, and refugees from around the world, who were also subject to a temporary ban, are no longer blocked either. But the ruling does not affect one part of Mr Trump's controversial executive order: a cap of 50,000 refugees to be admitted in the current fiscal year, down from the ceiling of 110,000 established under his predecessor, Barack Obama." http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38941016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted February 11, 2017 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted February 11, 2017 Just now, ICEMAN! said: Nope "The appeals court ruling means that visa holders from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen can continue to enter the US, and refugees from around the world, who were also subject to a temporary ban, are no longer blocked either. But the ruling does not affect one part of Mr Trump's controversial executive order: a cap of 50,000 refugees to be admitted in the current fiscal year, down from the ceiling of 110,000 established under his predecessor, Barack Obama." http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38941016 Simply pointing out not all judges ruled that way. You're 0-4 should be 1-4. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mileage Psycho Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 8 hours ago, Highmark said: It's not about terrorist attacks to me. I've stated this very clearly a number of times on here. Honest to God I could give two shits if a guy like you got killed in a terrorist attack. It's about American jobs. While I support smart free trade I don't support bringing in a million immigrants to our country every year and that's the legal ones. I got two kids that will be entering the workforce in 2-6 years and I want a strong job market for them. Make sure they study hard and are equipped to compete in a large market where the big sharks swim, that way you won't have to worry about them competing against orange peelers who can't even laugh in English 16 hours ago, Woodtick said: That's it in a nutshell 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin_dry Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 8 hours ago, Highmark said: It's not about terrorist attacks to me. I've stated this very clearly a number of times on here. Honest to God I could give two shits if a guy like you got killed in a terrorist attack. It's about American jobs. While I support smart free trade I don't support bringing in a million immigrants to our country every year and that's the legal ones. I got two kids that will be entering the workforce in 2-6 years and I want a strong job market for them. i thought you'd have higher hopes for your kids. vegetable pickers? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 Republicans - "We need stronger background checks and vetting for people coming into this country" Republicans - "People with mental health issues should be able to buy a gun without background checks or extreme vetting" 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 36 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said: Republicans - "We need stronger background checks and vetting for people coming into this country" Republicans - "People with mental health issues should be able to buy a gun without background checks or extreme vetting" I'm starting to understand how you girls ended up with Mamby Pamby Jr. up there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 10 hours ago, motonoggin said: If they can't get jobs, they're not trying hard enough. Where are their bootstraps? Right next to the Extra "contributions " the tax dodging liberals Bragg about Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 1 hour ago, Sleepr2 said: Right next to the Extra "contributions " the tax dodging liberals Bragg about Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 45 minutes ago, motonoggin said: More defense of the tax dodging leftists noted,,, 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 (edited) Edited February 12, 2017 by Snake 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 16 minutes ago, Snake said: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.