Yet another reason Biden has no business being president

[jtssrx]

 

 

[frenchy]

now the MSM is gospel  

[1jkw]

Fake news, nobody can get by the wall , and Mexico paid for it!

[Sleepr2]

Just now, 1jkw said:

Fake news, nobody can get by the wall , and Mexico paid for it!

But “ you can keep your doctors “ and “ Obambi  care will be cheaper “are not “lies” according to leftists newz ...l

 

you laughable.

[frenchy]

7 minutes ago, Sleepr2 said:

But “ you can keep your doctors “ and “ Obambi  care will be cheaper “are not “lies” according to leftists newz ...l

 

you laughable.

your rolodex of 5 recurring talking points all expired like 5 years ago. Time for some new material. 

[Sleepr2]

2 minutes ago, frenchy said:

your rolodex of 5 recurring talking points all expired like 5 years ago. Time for some new material. 

And that changes the leftists hypocrisy how? 
 

Funny how  dragging Kavanaughs history was fair game for the parasite party? 

Edited March 13, 2021 by Sleepr2

[frenchy]

1 minute ago, Sleepr2 said:

And that changes the leftists hypocrisy how? 

Tell us next about how the dems were the party of the KKK!  

[Sleepr2]

Just now, frenchy said:

Tell us next about how the dems were the party of the KKK!  

The leftists revising history is not a laughable Matter, they do it any time it suits their agenda. 

I doubt you’re capable or reading it, much less comprehending it 

 

 

 

  Dispelling the "Switched" myth AGAIN! 

(This is a compilation of information taken from several sources and by doing homework.)

 

I know it's hard when faced with the facts that in reality.That the Democrats supported slavery, started the Civil War when the abolitionist Republican Party won the Presidency, established the Ku Klux Klan to brutalize newly freed slaves and keep them from voting, opposed the Civil Rights Movement, modern-day liberals reflexively perpetuate rather pernicious myth--that the racist southern Democrats of the 1950s and 1960s became Republicans, leading to the so-called "switch" of the parties.

 

This is as ridiculous as it is easily debunked by anyone willing to use their head and do a little homework. You can go to the governments election results from 1959 to 1994 to find your answers.

 

However you need to ask the right questions along with checking the election results. Like #1 who maintained control of the federal houses of congress? #2 Then who controlled the majorities in individual state houses? You might even be bold enough to ask #3 who held governorship's in these places that supposedly "switched" and just when did they change hands?

 

In 1960, Democrats held every Senate seat south of the Mason-Dixon line.  In the 13 states that made up the Confederacy a century earlier, Democrats held a staggering 117-8 advantage in the House of Representatives.  The Democratic Party was so strong in the south that those 117 House members made up a full 41% of Democrats' 283-153 advantage in the Chamber.

 

Likewise, Democratic governors and Democratic State Legislatures controlled the South, which steadfastly opposed the push for civil rights. 

 

After the assassination of President Kennedy a strong proponent of civil rights, Southern Democrat L. B. J. saw it as his mission to pass it and to buy votes, It was J.F.K. who had first proposed the bill five months before he was killed.  Democrats in the Senate, however, filibustered it.

 

In June of 1964, though, the bill came up again, and it passed...over the strenuous objections of Southern Democrats.  80% of House Republicans voted for the measure, compared with just 61% of Democrats, while 82% of Republicans in the Senate supported it, compared with 69% of Democrats.

 

Nearly all of the opposition was, in the South, which was still nearly unanimously Democratic and resistant to the changing country.  One thing that didn't change, though, was party affiliation.  A total of 21 Democrats in the Senate opposed the Civil Rights Act.  Only one of them, "Dixiecrat" Strom Thurmond, ever became a Republican.  The rest, including Al Gore, Sr. and Robert Byrd--a former Exalted Cyclops in the Ku Klux Klan--remained Democrats until the day they died.

 

Moreover, as those 20 lifelong Democrats retired, their Senate seats remained in Democrat hands for several decades afterwards.  So too did the vast majority of the House seats in the South until 1994, when a Republican wave election swept the GOP into control of the House for the first time since 1952.  1994 was also the first time Republicans ever held a majority of House seats in the South--a full 30 years after the passage of the Civil Rights Act.  

 

If this was a sudden "switch" to the Republican Party for the old Democrat segregationists, it sure took a long time to happen. But you also have to believe that a party that fought for 100 years, just gave up on the purpose it was founded on?

 

The reality is that it didn't.  After the 1964 election--the first after the passage of the Civil Rights Act and the opportune time for racist Democrat voters to abandon the party in favor of Republicans--Democrats still held a 102-20 House majority in states that had once been part of the Confederacy.  In 1960, remember, that advantage was 117-8.  A pickup of 12 seats (half of them in Alabama) is hardly the massive shift one would expect if racist voters suddenly abandoned the Democratic Party in favor of the GOP. 

 

In fact, voting patterns in the South didn't really change all that much after the Civil Rights era. Democrats still dominated Senate, House, and gubernatorial elections for decades afterward.  Alabama, didn't elect a Republican governor until 1986. Mississippi didn't elect one until 1991. Georgia didn't elect one until 2002.

 

In the Senate, Republicans picked up four southern Senate seats in the 1960s and 1970s, while Democrats also picked up four.  Democratic incumbents won routinely.  If anything, those racist southern voters kept voting Democrat.

 

So how did this myth of a sudden "switch" get started and who perpetuated it?.

 

It's rooted in an equally pernicious myth of the supposedly racist "Southern Strategy" of Richard Nixon's 1968 presidential campaign, which was exploiting the innate racism of white southern voters.

 

Even before that, though, modern-day Democrats point to the 1964 presidential campaign of Republican Barry Goldwater, who refused to back the 1964 Civil Rights Act as proof that the GOP was actively courting racist southern voters.  

 

After all, they argue, Goldwater only won six states--his home state of Arizona and five states in the deep south.  His "State's Rights" platform had to be 'code" for a racist return to a segregated society, right? 

 

(Here we see Democrats openly using Joesph Geobbles tactic's as well as inventing extreme IDENTITY POLITICS and they've never stopped since)

 

Goldwater was actually very supportive of civil rights for black Americans, voting for the 1957 and 1960 Civil Rights Acts and even helping to found Arizona's chapter of the NAACP.  His opposition to the 1964 Act was not at all rooted in racism, but rather in a belief that it allowed the federal government to infringe on state sovereignty know as the 10th amendment.

 

The Lyndon B. Johnson campaign pounced on Goldwater's position and, during the height of the 1964 campaign, ran an ad titled "Confessions of a Republican," which rather nonsensically tied Goldwater to the Ku Klux Klan (which, remember, was a Democratic organization).

 

However the supposedly racist southern Republicans who voted for Nixon in 1972 also voted to re-elect Democrat Senators in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Georgia.  Republicans gained only eight southern seats in the House even though their presidential candidate won a record 520 electoral votes.

 

After Nixon resigned in 1974, Democrat Jimmy Carter swept the South en route to the presidency in 1976.  Did Carter similarly run on racist themes? (NO!) Or was he simply a stronger candidate? (YES!)

 

 After Ronald Reagan carried the south in two landslides and George H.W. Bush ran similarly strongly in 1988 while promising to be a "third Reagan term," Democrat Bill Clinton split the southern states with Bush in 1992 and with Bob Dole in 1996. 

 

Yet all the while, Democrats kept winning House, Senate, and gubernatorial elections.  Only in 2000 did southern voters give a unanimous Electoral College support for a Republican presidential candidate.

 

Racism didn't turn the South Republican, if it did, then why did it take 30 years? For those racist voters to finally give the GOP a majority of southern House seats?  Why did it take racist voters in Georgia 38 years to finally vote for a Republican governor?  And why did only one southern Democrat ever switch to the Republican Party?

 

The myth of the great Republican-Democrat "switch" is Bullshit and it is dispelled by simple logical historical analysis.

 

 

 

13th  amendment  to abolish slavery 

100 % republican support

23%  Democrats support

 

14th amendment to giving citizenship to freed slaves

100% republicans 

ZERO % Democrats

 

15th amendment the right to vote for all 

100% republicans 

ZERO % Democrats

 

[1jkw]

18 minutes ago, Sleepr2 said:

But “ you can keep your doctors “ and “ Obambi  care will be cheaper “are not “lies” according to leftists newz ...l

 

you laughable.

And the most unoriginal poster that never had a thought of his own replies.   

Probably less of a lie than claiming your plan would cover everyone at half the cost when you have no plan at all.  

Quick post that list, or it's bushes fault or some other meme, but don't think for yourself ever.

[CFM]

 

[Mainecat]

28 minutes ago, 1jkw said:

And the most unoriginal poster that never had a thought of his own replies.   

Probably less of a lie than claiming your plan would cover everyone at half the cost when you have no plan at all.  

Quick post that list, or it's bushes fault or some other meme, but don't think for yourself ever.

Two weeks.

[Sleepr2]

48 minutes ago, Mainecat said:

Two weeks.

[Sleepr2]

1 hour ago, 1jkw said:

And the most unoriginal poster that never had a thought of his own replies.   

Probably less of a lie than claiming your plan would cover everyone at half the cost when you have no plan at all.  

Quick post that list, or it's bushes fault or some other meme, but don't think for yourself ever.

And “tax the rich” and “it’s for the children” was so original, 

[Skidooski]

The bigger question is did they get the brand new Biden T-shirts?

[Guest]

9 hours ago, jtssrx said:

 

 

You can thank Trump, for giving us Biden. 

Just like the Dems could thank Hillary for giving us Trump. 

Biden is junk, but the voters HATED Trump more. 

Trump lost because: 

He made fun of Carly Fiorina's looks.

He made fun of Heidi Cruz' looks.

He made fun of a DISABLED reporter.

He said women should be prosecuted for seeking an abortion.

He said Mexico would pay for the border wall.......WE PAID FOR THE FUKKIN WALL.

He stood in front of a church in DC.......HOLDING A BIBLE. 

I voted for Trump....out of stock market greed. 

We now know what a scum-bag he is, and always was. 

Biden/Harris are an abomination,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,thank the bastard Trump for that. 

[jtssrx]

8 minutes ago, Polaris 550 said:

You can thank Trump, for giving us Biden. 

Just like the Dems could thank Hillary for giving us Trump. 

Biden is junk, but the voters HATED Trump more. 

Trump lost because: 

He made fun of Carly Fiorina's looks.

He made fun of Heidi Cruz' looks.

He made fun of a DISABLED reporter.

He said women should be prosecuted for seeking an abortion.

He said Mexico would pay for the border wall.......WE PAID FOR THE FUKKIN WALL.

He stood in front of a church in DC.......HOLDING A BIBLE. 

I voted for Trump....out of stock market greed. 

We now know what a scum-bag he is, and always was. 

Biden/Harris are an abomination,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,thank the bastard Trump for that. 

He got 10 million more votes than last time. 

[Guest]

Just now, jtssrx said:

He got 10 million more votes than last time. 

Agreed, it was a historically high voter turn-out. However, Biden got about 8 million more votes than Trump. 

The bottom line is, YOU, ME, WE are screwed. The country is gone. Race, Politics, Economics, are destroying the country. 

No matter who gets in, it will be contentious. It's a matter of DEMOGRAPHICS. It was just a matter of time, and that time is here now. 

Polarized.............beyond repair. 

 

[1jkw]

9 hours ago, Sleepr2 said:

And “tax the rich” and “it’s for the children” was so original, 

Another one of your non original lines, that I never said. Stick to being a drunk.

[1jkw]

1 hour ago, Polaris 550 said:

Agreed, it was a historically high voter turn-out. However, Biden got about 8 million more votes than Trump. 

The bottom line is, YOU, ME, WE are screwed. The country is gone. Race, Politics, Economics, are destroying the country. 

No matter who gets in, it will be contentious. It's a matter of DEMOGRAPHICS. It was just a matter of time, and that time is here now. 

Polarized.............beyond repair. 

 

 

You should be happy, now that you landed the assistant health secretary job.

[DriftBusta]

3 minutes ago, 1jkw said:

Another one of your non original lines, that I never said. Stick to being a drunk.

Oh isnt that nice. Smh.

[1jkw]

1 minute ago, DriftBusta said:

Oh isnt that nice. Smh.

Wasn't intended to be nice. 

Do you think he was trying to be nice to me?

[Ez ryder]

11 hours ago, 1jkw said:

Fake news, nobody can get by the wall , and Mexico paid for it!

They don't need to the gates are wide open 

[DriftBusta]

1 minute ago, 1jkw said:

Wasn't intended to be nice. 

Do you think he was trying to be nice to me?

He wasnt calling you a drunk.  You seem to take it personal that many people think Biden is a bad joke.  Add me to that list please.

[Mainecat]

Biden’s done in 8 weeks what Trump couldn’t do in 4 years.

[1jkw]

4 minutes ago, DriftBusta said:

He wasnt calling you a drunk.  You seem to take it personal that many people think Biden is a bad joke.  Add me to that list please.

I didn't say he was.

 

Nothing to do with Biden, he is not fit to be president, and if it wasn't for Trump he never would have been, it's that simple.

 

Edited March 13, 2021 by 1jkw