DriftBusta Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 18 minutes ago, Rod said: 100 speedo is is like 89 gps tho 99 change on gps friendo. Made a few adjustments at least its revving at proper rpms now from last year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted January 23 Author Share Posted January 23 3 minutes ago, DriftBusta said: 99 change on gps friendo. Made a few adjustments at least its revving at proper rpms now from last year. Think the best I seent was 107 speedo here’s the dragy difference between the new mock and my 96 mock C LT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted January 23 Author Share Posted January 23 Iirc the old 780 was bored to an 800 and had light porting and stock pipes 780 was a 136 and of course new mock is a 137 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted January 23 Author Share Posted January 23 @f7ben please explain to the nurds the difference in those times Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 5 hours ago, Rod said: @f7ben please explain to the nurds the difference in those times Looks like they left pretty evenly and the run in the right was putting a bus length on the other sled after the 1/8th mile. One of those sleds laid down bad at 80 and I think I know which one lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awful knawful Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 8 hours ago, Rod said: 100 speedo is is like 89 gps tho I've had mine to 162 on GPS. At that speed speedo was out 10kmh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 27 minutes ago, awful knawful said: I've had mine to 162 on GPS. At that speed speedo was out 10kmh Is it studded? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member 800renegaderider Posted January 23 Gold Member Share Posted January 23 Is that with or without launch control on the dragy comparison. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awful knawful Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 31 minutes ago, f7ben said: Is it studded? No. 1.5" ice ripper Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted January 23 Author Share Posted January 23 1 hour ago, 800renegaderider said: Is that with or without launch control on the dragy comparison. With Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member 800renegaderider Posted January 23 Gold Member Share Posted January 23 1 hour ago, Rod said: With I woulda thought it help more in the 60 doesn’t look like much of a difference Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted January 23 Author Share Posted January 23 Just now, 800renegaderider said: I woulda thought it help more in the 60 doesn’t look like much of a difference Well the 780 is also a 136 with a cut mountain track and clutched for it new mock does launch hard. But honestly that’s all it has 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted January 23 Author Share Posted January 23 5 hours ago, f7ben said: Looks like they left pretty evenly and the run in the right was putting a bus length on the other sled after the 1/8th mile. One of those sleds laid down bad at 80 and I think I know which one lol Lolz that’s why I say the new mock literally lays down after 70 mph ish the old 780 had over 10 mph on it in the 1/4. That’s not a walk that’s an epic gaping same ET in 660 but the 780 was almost 1/2 second faster in the 1/4. That’s arm stretching difference Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 1 hour ago, Rod said: Lolz that’s why I say the new mock literally lays down after 70 mph ish the old 780 had over 10 mph on it in the 1/4. That’s not a walk that’s an epic gaping same ET in 660 but the 780 was almost 1/2 second faster in the 1/4. That’s arm stretching difference Yes , a half second at over 98 mph is a buss length and that’s fucking pathetic lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted January 28 Author Share Posted January 28 130 miles ish. Decent day. Very passable but we need snow 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted January 28 Author Share Posted January 28 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 Great IG follow https://www.instagram.com/reel/C2ygS-VMKoH/?igsh=aGhjcHBxbnAzNHRk 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awful knawful Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 On 1/23/2024 at 12:20 PM, Rod said: Lolz that’s why I say the new mock literally lays down after 70 mph ish the old 780 had over 10 mph on it in the 1/4. That’s not a walk that’s an epic gaping same ET in 660 but the 780 was almost 1/2 second faster in the 1/4. That’s arm stretching difference 169kmh is the new high mark on a short stretch, 160gps. Pulling pretty hard. Plenty fast for this guy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted February 1 Author Share Posted February 1 53 minutes ago, awful knawful said: 169kmh is the new high mark on a short stretch, 160gps. Pulling pretty hard. Plenty fast for this guy. So 99 mph 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 1 hour ago, Rod said: So 99 mph Or the same as most old sit down 600s lol….what a fucking faggot sled 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 15 minutes ago, f7ben said: Or the same as most old sit down 600s lol….what a fucking faggot sled My wife's old clutched ,studded 98 xc600 consistently ran 101-103 mph on radar wfo in ideal conditions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted February 1 Author Share Posted February 1 22 minutes ago, f7ben said: Or the same as most old sit down 600s lol….what a fucking faggot sled They are torquey down low and decent 0-70 so if that’s all you want then it’s ok but they simply don’t have that arm stretching goodness like a winder does just imo if a turbo 4 stroke doesn’t light your hair on fire in a straight line then what’s the point of all that extra weight it is a nice trail sled but. Meh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted February 2 Author Share Posted February 2 Ooof 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member 800renegaderider Posted February 2 Gold Member Share Posted February 2 3 minutes ago, Rod said: Ooof It be cheaper to do a 998 swap lol 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 11 hours ago, Rod said: They are torquey down low and decent 0-70 so if that’s all you want then it’s ok but they simply don’t have that arm stretching goodness like a winder does just imo if a turbo 4 stroke doesn’t light your hair on fire in a straight line then what’s the point of all that extra weight it is a nice trail sled but. Meh. 100% , 900ace is all the penalty and none of the zoot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.