SVT MXZ XRS Posted December 9, 2019 Author Share Posted December 9, 2019 Just now, Carlos Danger said: If the whistle blower was a fountain of truth the Dems would have had him front and center. Let's face it the case is wanting of evidence and that can't be fixed with interviews of council lawyers who have no first hand knowledge. BINGO! But he's a liar and a fraud, and a scared little pussy , just like Barb. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted December 9, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 9, 2019 2 minutes ago, SVT MXZ XRS said: I forgot, you're both scared little bitches too. You're nothing but a massive pussy. That's been proven MANY times already Troll svt 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted December 9, 2019 Share Posted December 9, 2019 It was the woman they ran out in front of the cameras during the Kavanaugh hearings that tells you all you need to know about what the Dems will do to a witness for their own political gain. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SVT MXZ XRS Posted December 9, 2019 Author Share Posted December 9, 2019 1 minute ago, Carlos Danger said: It was the woman they ran out in front of the cameras during the Kavanaugh hearings that tells you all you need to know about what the Dems will do to a witness for their own political gain. Yep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 You dumbasses need to stop getting your news from Fox and Breitbart. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 1 hour ago, Carlos Danger said: If the whistle blower was a fountain of truth the Dems would have had him front and center. Let's face it the case is wanting of evidence and that can't be fixed with interviews of council lawyers who have no first hand knowledge. Sure it was only the whistleblower other than Trump, Gulliani and Mulvaney who admitted it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 9 minutes ago, revkevsdi said: You dumbasses need to stop getting your news from Fox and Breitbart. Right back at you MSNBC/ Huff po. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 11 minutes ago, Carlos Danger said: Right back at you MSNBC/ Huff po. You won’t see this on fox so you better look away well you’ll see what Lindsay Graham said but not the answers. “In America you can’t even get a parking ticket based on hearsay testimony. But you can impeach a president?,” a seemingly incredulous Graham tweeted, adding, “I certainly hope not.” Graham’s tweeted caught the attention of several legal experts, many of whom pointed out deficiencies in the notion that Trump was being impeached based on hearsay in light of facts that have been confirmed since the whistleblower complaint was made public on Thursday. Former federal prosecutor and CNN legal analyst Renato Mariotti pointed out that the memo detailing Trump’s conversation with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and confirming many of the allegations in the whistleblower’s complaint, is not hearsay evidence. “The transcript of Trump’s call with the Ukrainian President was non-hearsay and would be admissible against him. Any lawyer, like yourself, should know that,” Mariotti tweeted in response to Graham. This point was reiterated by another former federal prosecutor, Elie Honig, who referred to Graham’s argument as desperate. “Is the phone call between Trump and Zelensky hearsay? (Hint: NO). Your desperation is showing [Lindsey Graham],” he tweeted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 10 minutes ago, revkevsdi said: You won’t see this on fox so you better look away well you’ll see what Lindsay Graham said but not the answers. “In America you can’t even get a parking ticket based on hearsay testimony. But you can impeach a president?,” a seemingly incredulous Graham tweeted, adding, “I certainly hope not.” Graham’s tweeted caught the attention of several legal experts, many of whom pointed out deficiencies in the notion that Trump was being impeached based on hearsay in light of facts that have been confirmed since the whistleblower complaint was made public on Thursday. Former federal prosecutor and CNN legal analyst Renato Mariotti pointed out that the memo detailing Trump’s conversation with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and confirming many of the allegations in the whistleblower’s complaint, is not hearsay evidence. “The transcript of Trump’s call with the Ukrainian President was non-hearsay and would be admissible against him. Any lawyer, like yourself, should know that,” Mariotti tweeted in response to Graham. This point was reiterated by another former federal prosecutor, Elie Honig, who referred to Graham’s argument as desperate. “Is the phone call between Trump and Zelensky hearsay? (Hint: NO). Your desperation is showing [Lindsey Graham],” he tweeted. None of the dreams cooked up in CNNs head could or have done very well on cross examination. It is pretty straight forward did Trump do what Biden/Obama did to the Ukraine? Again the Dems in the house needed to move swing voters and their thin partisan case has done the opposite. So who do you think the Dems will run in 2024? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.