Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted October 30, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted October 30, 2019 (edited) Here it is in a nutshell. "Hillary wasn't guilty because she didn't intend to send classified emails." "Trump is guilty because we think he was demanding a quid pro quo." Edited October 30, 2019 by Highmark 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DriftBusta Posted October 30, 2019 Share Posted October 30, 2019 They should just name this place the TDS forum and get it over with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted October 30, 2019 Share Posted October 30, 2019 Perfect example Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 3 hours ago, Highmark said: Here it is in a nutshell. "Hillary wasn't guilty because she didn't intend to send classified emails." "Trump is guilty because we think he was demanding a quid pro quo." The guidelines these twats set forth for the “inquiry” is a fucking joke. They have the right to refuse questions from the R’s, witnesses, any information, etc,etc. Just let them do whatever they want....then bring it to trial. Let the subpoenas fly!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 Here's how it works for normal people Hillary was obviously guilty Trump is obviously guilty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bussman Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 Here’s how it works for observant people: There is circumstantial evidence Hillary is guilty There is hearsay Trump is guilty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 8 minutes ago, f7ben said: Here's how it works for normal people Hillary was obviously guilty Trump is obviously guilty Ur a libtwat! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 1 minute ago, bussman said: Here’s how it works for observant people: There is circumstantial evidence Hillary is guilty There is hearsay Trump is guilty Shocker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 1 minute ago, Anler said: Ur a libtwat! He is! He is a libtwat!!!!! And cunt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bussman Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 4 minutes ago, f7ben said: Shocker Those are just facts. Sorry you don’t deal in that for whatever reason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 Just now, bussman said: Those are just facts. Sorry you don’t deal in that for whatever reason. So you discount the testimony of all those who have said there was a known quid pro quo. Shocker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bussman Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 9 minutes ago, f7ben said: So you discount the testimony of all those who have said there was a known quid pro quo. Shocker The testimony that was said to be altered? Who is telling the truth? Trump is guilty because people say he’s guilty? There have been no court proceedings. That’s the definition of hearsay. Has nothing to do with his presumed guilt or innocence. You need to be more disciplined in this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 7 minutes ago, bussman said: The testimony that was said to be altered? Who is telling the truth? Trump is guilty because people say he’s guilty? There have been no court proceedings. That’s the definition of hearsay. Has nothing to do with his presumed guilt or innocence. You need to be more disciplined in this. Trump is a piece of shit.....if he makes a claim 99% chance hes lying. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 7 minutes ago, bussman said: The testimony that was said to be altered? Who is telling the truth? Trump is guilty because people say he’s guilty? There have been no court proceedings. That’s the definition of hearsay. Has nothing to do with his presumed guilt or innocence. You need to be more disciplined in this. This impeachment scheme has been the plan since Oct 9, 2016. I’m just glad to see them finally get something as rock solid as phone call to the Ukraine!!!!!!! BULLETPROOF! Trump wins 2020 easily. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bussman Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 3 minutes ago, f7ben said: Trump is a piece of shit.....if he makes a claim 99% chance hes lying. Okay. But that changes nothing in what I said. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 4 minutes ago, bussman said: Okay. But that changes nothing in what I said. Listen Brianna.......we've been over this 100 times and I've been right all along. The government is 100% corrupt. All they do is lie. Trump is the same. If he is whining a d crying about something 100% chance hes lying Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bussman Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 2 minutes ago, f7ben said: Listen Brianna.......we've been over this 100 times and I've been right all along. The government is 100% corrupt. All they do is lie. Trump is the same. If he is whining a d crying about something 100% chance hes lying I already agreed with you Bhenny Hahnahh 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frenchy Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 50 minutes ago, f7ben said: Here's how it works for normal people Hillary was obviously guilty Trump is obviously guilty And no guilt on either side for their collective supporters they all believe they are above reproach. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin_dry Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 5 minutes ago, frenchy said: And no guilt on either side for their collective supporters they all believe they are above reproach. They both should have their feet cut off and thrown in a basket. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 13 minutes ago, frenchy said: And no guilt on either side for their collective supporters they all believe they are above reproach. This is what identity politics is all about. This is what liberals wanted. This is what they got. Enjoy! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 28 minutes ago, bussman said: I already agreed with you Bhenny Hahnahh Oh damn! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin_dry Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 23 minutes ago, Zambroski said: This is what identity politics is all about. This is what liberals wanted. This is what they got. Enjoy! I find it entertaining Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.