Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Victory!


Recommended Posts

  • Platinum Contributing Member
Just now, Anler said:

Mmm hmm

Not all as they were dry and had increased fires but it is a normal process there.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slash-and-burn

The method begins by cutting down the trees and woody plants in an area. The downed vegetation, or "slash", is then left to dry, usually right before the rainiest part of the year. Then, the biomass is burned, resulting in a nutrient-rich layer of ash which makes the soil fertile, as well as temporarily eliminating weed and pest species. After about three to five years, the plot's productivity decreases due to depletion of nutrients along with weed and pest invasion, causing the farmers to abandon the field and move over to a new area. The time it takes for a swidden to recover depends on the location and can be as little as five years to more than twenty years, after which the plot can be slashed and burned again, repeating the cycle.[2][3][4] In India, the practice is known as jhum or jhoom.[5][6]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
10 hours ago, spin_dry said:

Can you imagine how fertile that soil will be? Not to mention the year long growing season. When they get done clearing that area it’ll be the bread basket of the world. Cheap labor and amazing crops for sure. The world is going to look a lot different in 10 years. 

:pc:

The method begins by cutting down the trees and woody plants in an area. The downed vegetation, or "slash", is then left to dry, usually right before the rainiest part of the year. Then, the biomass is burned, resulting in a nutrient-rich layer of ash which makes the soil fertile, as well as temporarily eliminating weed and pest species. After about three to five years, the plot's productivity decreases due to depletion of nutrients along with weed and pest invasion, causing the farmers to abandon the field and move over to a new area. The time it takes for a swidden to recover depends on the location and can be as little as five years to more than twenty years, after which the plot can be slashed and burned again, repeating the cycle.[2][3][4] In India, the practice is known as jhum or jhoom.[5][6]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Highmark said:

Not all as they were dry and had increased fires but it is a normal process there.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slash-and-burn

The method begins by cutting down the trees and woody plants in an area. The downed vegetation, or "slash", is then left to dry, usually right before the rainiest part of the year. Then, the biomass is burned, resulting in a nutrient-rich layer of ash which makes the soil fertile, as well as temporarily eliminating weed and pest species. After about three to five years, the plot's productivity decreases due to depletion of nutrients along with weed and pest invasion, causing the farmers to abandon the field and move over to a new area. The time it takes for a swidden to recover depends on the location and can be as little as five years to more than twenty years, after which the plot can be slashed and burned again, repeating the cycle.[2][3][4] In India, the practice is known as jhum or jhoom.[5][6]

We have controlled burns here too. Some species of native plants need them from time to time to thrive. But I think the rest of the world is getting fed up with US fuckery abroad. That area is prime for farmland. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
4 minutes ago, Anler said:

We have controlled burns here too. Some species of native plants need them from time to time to thrive. But I think the rest of the world is getting fed up with US fuckery abroad. That area is prime for farmland. 

Well the entire industrialized world thinks its theirs to control.

The increased rate of fires in Brazil has raised the most concerns as international leaders, particularly French president Emmanuel Macron, and environmental non-government organizations (ENGOs) attributed these to Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro's pro-business policies that had weakened environmental protections and have encouraged deforestation of the Amazon after he took office in January 2019

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Highmark said:

:pc:

The method begins by cutting down the trees and woody plants in an area. The downed vegetation, or "slash", is then left to dry, usually right before the rainiest part of the year. Then, the biomass is burned, resulting in a nutrient-rich layer of ash which makes the soil fertile, as well as temporarily eliminating weed and pest species. After about three to five years, the plot's productivity decreases due to depletion of nutrients along with weed and pest invasion, causing the farmers to abandon the field and move over to a new area. The time it takes for a swidden to recover depends on the location and can be as little as five years to more than twenty years, after which the plot can be slashed and burned again, repeating the cycle.[2][3][4] In India, the practice is known as jhum or jhoom.[5][6]

I don’t believe it. This is just one article of many involving rain forests becoming farmland  

Global agricultural expansion cut a wide swath through tropical forests during the 1980s and 1990s.  More than half a million square miles of new farmland – an area roughly the size of Alaska – was created in the developing world between 1980 and 2000, of which over 80 percent was carved out of tropical forests, according to Stanford researcher Holly Gibbs.

https://news.stanford.edu/news/2010/september/farmland-cutting-forests-090210.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
8 minutes ago, spin_dry said:

I don’t believe it. This is just one article of many involving rain forests becoming farmland  

Global agricultural expansion cut a wide swath through tropical forests during the 1980s and 1990s.  More than half a million square miles of new farmland – an area roughly the size of Alaska – was created in the developing world between 1980 and 2000, of which over 80 percent was carved out of tropical forests, according to Stanford researcher Holly Gibbs.

https://news.stanford.edu/news/2010/september/farmland-cutting-forests-090210.html

Well should they not be able to do what they want with their land?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Highmark said:

Well the entire industrialized world thinks its theirs to control.

The increased rate of fires in Brazil has raised the most concerns as international leaders, particularly French president Emmanuel Macron, and environmental non-government organizations (ENGOs) attributed these to Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro's pro-business policies that had weakened environmental protections and have encouraged deforestation of the Amazon after he took office in January 2019

 

Oh I know. If I were to bet tho I would say their concerns arent necessarily for the sake of the planet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
12 minutes ago, Anler said:

Oh I know. If I were to bet tho I would say their concerns arent necessarily for the sake of the planet. 

Way too much is made of this region's CO2 consumption/Oxygen production.   Its deeply rooted in the whole MMGW global push.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol



×
×
  • Create New...