revkevsdi Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 1 minute ago, DriftBusta said: Yeah that number is bullshit. Ask the average Haitian what they think of the Clintons.. There is a link to Trumps rating. Care to talk about that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 10 minutes ago, frenchy said: so why didn't you share it here? 90% is really unheard of for any large charity. What will happen if I find the link? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frenchy Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 15 minutes ago, revkevsdi said: What will happen if I find the link? you tell me. there's a reason why you are stalling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 Just now, frenchy said: you tell me. there's a reason why you are stalling. My guess is that you will make a lame excuse. Here is one that says 89% Does that make you fell better? Daniel Borochoff, president and founder of CharityWatch, told us by phone that its analysis of the finances of the Clinton Foundation and its affiliates found that about 89 percent of the foundation budget is spent on programming (or “charity”), higher than the 75 percent considered the industry standard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry ginger Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 https://www.charitywatch.org/ratings-and-metrics/clinton-foundation/478 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry ginger Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 while i think they are shady as fuck there is no question the charity did better than a lot in distributing money out. but lets remember 10% off the top of a $2 million charity is nothing but 10% off the top of a billion $ charity is a shit ton of money Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted June 13, 2019 Author Share Posted June 13, 2019 Back on topic....how many Trumers here think what he’s doing is ok and not breaking emoluments laws? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 21 minutes ago, revkevsdi said: My guess is that you will make a lame excuse. Here is one that says 89% Does that make you fell better? Daniel Borochoff, president and founder of CharityWatch, told us by phone that its analysis of the finances of the Clinton Foundation and its affiliates found that about 89 percent of the foundation budget is spent on programming (or “charity”), higher than the 75 percent considered the industry standard. Wasn't Charity Watch the one that was caught taking kick backs from charities? Also, 2011-7% logged going to charity Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 31 minutes ago, Zambroski said: Wasn't Charity Watch the one that was caught taking kick backs from charities? Also, 2011-7% logged going to charity Unless the source is DUh underground or Huffpo it’s “right wing propaganda “ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 2 hours ago, revkevsdi said: The truth is nowhere close to your misconceptions. Look up Charity rating sites and compare the Clinton’s to Trump. See what you find out and get back to me. My bet is if you stay away from extreme right wing propaganda sites you may learn something. right back at you . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 1 hour ago, Zambroski said: Wasn't Charity Watch the one that was caught taking kick backs from charities? Also, 2011-7% logged going to charity oops Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frenchy Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 2 hours ago, revkevsdi said: My guess is that you will make a lame excuse. Here is one that says 89% Does that make you fell better? Daniel Borochoff, president and founder of CharityWatch, told us by phone that its analysis of the finances of the Clinton Foundation and its affiliates found that about 89 percent of the foundation budget is spent on programming (or “charity”), higher than the 75 percent considered the industry standard. alright, did some digging and found 87% a few places which is pretty good. Of course the biggest issue with the Clinton foundation is it isn't endowment based and many of it's largest donors are foreign governments. None of these watchdog organizations can really evaluate the motives of donors, especially foreign government donations. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted June 13, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 13, 2019 7 minutes ago, frenchy said: alright, did some digging and found 87% a few places which is pretty good. Of course the biggest issue with the Clinton foundation is it isn't endowment based and many of it's largest donors are foreign governments. None of these watchdog organizations can really evaluate the motives of donors, especially foreign government donations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 (edited) 2 hours ago, Zambroski said: Wasn't Charity Watch the one that was caught taking kick backs from charities? Also, 2011-7% logged going to charity If they were you’d have a link instead of a bunch of charts without a link to verify them. Let’s not forget that the Clinton released their tax returns. Check Frenchy’s post below dumbass. Owned by your own team. 31 minutes ago, frenchy said: alright, did some digging and found 87% a few places which is pretty good. Of course the biggest issue with the Clinton foundation is it isn't endowment based and many of it's largest donors are foreign governments. None of these watchdog organizations can really evaluate the motives of donors, especially foreign government donations. Pretty good? When the average is 75% I’d say it’s very good. How does that compare with Trumps foundation? He used it to pay a personal fine of $100,000.00. Edited June 13, 2019 by revkevsdi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frenchy Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 1 minute ago, revkevsdi said: If they were you’d have a link instead of a bunch of charts without a link to verify them. Let’s not forget that the Clinton released their tax returns. Check Frenchy’s post below dumbass. Owned by your own team. Pretty good? When the average is 75% I’d say it’s very good. How does that compare with Trumps foundation? He used it to pay a personal fine of $100,000.00. I see you totally ignored the most important point of my post Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry ginger Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 5 minutes ago, frenchy said: I see you totally ignored the most important point of my post partianship blinders does that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 43 minutes ago, frenchy said: alright, did some digging and found 87% a few places which is pretty good. Of course the biggest issue with the Clinton foundation is it isn't endowment based and many of it's largest donors are foreign governments. None of these watchdog organizations can really evaluate the motives of donors, especially foreign government donations. The WikiLeaks of Podesta's emails gives a pretty good picture of what some of the donors expected for their donation and it wasn't charity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 8 minutes ago, frenchy said: I see you totally ignored the most important point of my post One step at a time. Now we’ve established that they are not using their charity as a “slouch” find. They didn’t find any wrong doing they just questioned the motives of the foreign entities donating. However investigations and their tax returns show that the clintons are not benefiting personally from their foundation. If you are concerned about foreign “donations” wouldn’t you be concerned about foreign interests spending money at Trump properties? Or this https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/companies-detail-payments-to-trump-s-lawyer-michael-cohen-20180510-p4zedm.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 Anotehr day...BarbieHands getting rolled on an Internet forum. Normal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted June 13, 2019 Author Share Posted June 13, 2019 Where do you Trump guys send your checks to Trumps charity? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 8 hours ago, Zambroski said: Wasn't Charity Watch the one that was caught taking kick backs from charities? Also, 2011-7% logged going to charity 6 hours ago, Ez ryder said: oops 5 hours ago, frenchy said: alright, did some digging and found 87% a few places which is pretty good. Of course the biggest issue with the Clinton foundation is it isn't endowment based and many of it's largest donors are foreign governments. None of these watchdog organizations can really evaluate the motives of donors, especially foreign government donations. 4 hours ago, Zambroski said: Anotehr day...BarbieHands getting rolled on an Internet forum. Normal. Except your posts are proven bullshit. Even Frenchy had to admit the Clinton foundation has a better record than most Charities. Find a charity watchdog that will say something nice about Trumps "Slouch" fund. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 16 minutes ago, revkevsdi said: Except your posts are proven bullshit. Even Frenchy had to admit the Clinton foundation has a better record than most Charities. Find a charity watchdog that will say something nice about Trumps "Slouch" fund. You are just confusing yourself anymore. Dork. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 4 minutes ago, Zambroski said: You are just confusing yourself anymore. Dork. You are just confusing yourself anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 48 minutes ago, revkevsdi said: Except your posts are proven bullshit. Even Frenchy had to admit the Clinton foundation has a better record than most Charities. Find a charity watchdog that will say something nice about Trumps "Slouch" fund. lmfao if you feel it is such a good foundation put your money where your cock hole is . they really need the money now that political favors are out the window donations are non existent Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.