Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

FOX Judge Napolitano nails Trumps guilt


Recommended Posts

Just now, Mainecat said:

Like Trump said he could shoot someone in Times Square and still get their vote.......

The example is the above 2 Trump voters dumb as fuckin stumps.

Was that obstruction too?  Make sure that is in the impeachment articles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone that runs a campaign against Trump needs to find the narratives that will explain to Americans with dull normal intelligence how trump places himself above the law. That will require someone of intelligence and good verbal skills. This should be fun. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, spin_dry said:

Anyone that runs a campaign against Trump needs to find the narratives that will explain to Americans with dull normal intelligence how trump places himself above the law. That will require someone of intelligence and good verbal skills. This should be fun. 

What laws did trump break?  

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, spin_dry said:

Anyone that runs a campaign against Trump needs to find the narratives that will explain to Americans with dull normal intelligence how trump places himself above the law. That will require someone of intelligence and good verbal skills. This should be fun. 

Like he has for the past 2 years? :lol:

Who has been having all the fun lately?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, spin_dry said:

Anyone that runs a campaign against Trump needs to find the narratives that will explain to Americans with dull normal intelligence how trump places himself above the law. That will require someone of intelligence and good verbal skills. This should be fun. 

This post was so loaded with hilarity and hypocrisy, it’s hard to believe you pecked it out and hit “Submit Reply” with a straight face.  But I know you did!

Just remember, in a battle between intellect and emotions, let emotions win!  Some of you don’t have a choice.

:lol:

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, AKIQPilot said:

What laws did trump break?  

 

10 minutes ago, Anler said:

Sounds like obstruction. 

 

7 minutes ago, Snake said:

Sounds like a narrative. 

:lol:

Excellent volley!  Just excellent!   :lmao:

 

:

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mainecat said:

Like Trump said he could shoot someone in Times Square and still get their vote.......

The example is the above 2 Trump voters dumb as fuckin stumps.

You can't obstruct when there is no crime!!!! Now fuck off you stupid piece of shit

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, and the entire second volume of the Mueller report is a garbage document. There is zero case law sighted in the document. It was purely written for the Democrats to use to attack trump with.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member

Here is what the overlying question is and it relates to intent.   What was the motive to any so called interference into the investigation?   Was it to escape justice or stop the SC investigation from harming the Presidents ability to get things done.   

Elements of an Obstruction of Justice Charge

The elements required for a conviction on an obstruction of justice charge differ slightly by code section. For instance, prosecutors must prove the following elements for a conviction under section 1503 of the federal statute (influencing or injuring an officer or juror):

  1. There was a pending federal judicial proceeding;
  2. The defendant knew of the proceeding; and
  3. The defendant had corrupt intent to interfere with or attempted to interfere with the proceeding.

And as president, Trump has full legal authority to fire subordinates like Rosenstein and Mueller (as well as James Comey, whom he did fire) at will. This would not be obstruction of justice, but an exercise of his constitutional powers, and the notion that exercising constitutional powers could be criminal is patently absurd. The exercise of those powers could incense Congress enough to impeach the president, but that’s a political process, not a simple exercise of law enforcement. Congress has even tacitly endorsed a president’s power to fire a special counsel by permitting the law under which Lawrence Walsh, Kenneth Starr, and other post–Watergate “independent counsels” were appointed to expire in 1999. That law specified that the president could not dismiss an independent counsel appointed according to the law’s provisions. The law would have been redundant if ordinary Justice Department-appointed special counsels, like Mueller, had the same independence.

Trump wanted to get rid of Mueller and Rosenstein to spare himself the distraction and indignity that other presidents suffered through, not to obstruct justice. He knew, as everyone in Washington knows, that such investigations inevitably become protracted, expensive, politically damaging and ultimately pointless ordeals. No one would want to go through what Bill Clinton went through, and he was actually guilty of something. Why then is it to be expected that Trump should subject himself to a “Starr chamber” when constitutionally he is not required to do so and has the power to prevent it? Yet after firing Comey, Trump played along with the ritual indignity, however much he hated it, and may have mused to McGahn about ending it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, spin_dry said:

Anyone that runs a campaign against Trump needs to find the narratives that will explain to Americans with dull normal intelligence how trump places himself above the law. That will require someone of intelligence and good verbal skills. This should be fun. 

But those brown skins are sneaking in from the Mexican border taking our jobs and raping and killing our citizens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jtssrx said:

Oh, and the entire second volume of the Mueller report is a garbage document. There is zero case law sighted in the document. It was purely written for the Democrats to use to attack trump with.  

Are you this stupid? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...