oleroule Posted September 23, 2016 Share Posted September 23, 2016 3 hours ago, SnowRider said: Independent analysis. . The isssue will be the R's filibustering it and not allowing it to pass to protect the 1% So why are you and others defending the R's who will clearly oppose the more fiscally conservative plan? i read on here earlier this week from a Rump Pumper that you can only go off what they propose..... here's my independent analysis: Hillary's a old communist cunt. Hillary and Trump will spend money like a drunken sailor. the only answer is to dissolve the union because it is the only way to put power back into the hands of locals. go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted September 23, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 23, 2016 I know this is very hard for the Hillary supporters to understand but here goes. Hillary's plan is simply an extension of Obama economic policy. A policy that has resulted in the lowest ave economic growth since the great depression. You can post your little meme's about this or that all of which can be debunked with other numbers. We need economic growth and you cannot do that with the economic policies of Obama and Hillary. Even Bill Clinton agreed to slashing CG tax rates by 30%. If he didn't you people wouldn't be able to brag about how good the economy was during his Presidency. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted September 23, 2016 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 23, 2016 3 minutes ago, Zambroski said: There, I fixed that for you. You realize that a large group here feel that same way about Hillary right? Just making sure. Because you aren't winning over any hearts and minds. And you posting "analysis" doesn't make you smarter than anyone else on here. That much I can promise you. SO, get over yourself a bit...and calm down. And the bold is the dumbest thing I've seen posted today. But, I'm still sipping coffee and back reading a bit...so give that time. The link is there Not only am I one of the smartest posters on the forum - I'm also one of the calmest. It's apparent the hypocrisy and manipulation of a Rump Pumper has been exposed this morning. It's what I do and I'm good at it . Can you direct me to the area of the forum where Dump's policies have been discussed in detail, supported by independent analysis, and are good for the average middle-class to upper middle-class voter who makes up the majority of this forum... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted September 23, 2016 Share Posted September 23, 2016 (edited) 2 minutes ago, SnowRider said: The link is there Not only am I one of the smartest posters on the forum - I'm also one of the calmest. It's apparent the hypocrisy and manipulation of a Rump Pumper has been exposed this morning. It's what I do and I'm good at it . Can you direct me to the area of the forum where Dump's policies have been discussed in detail, supported by independent analysis, and are good for the average middle-class to upper middle-class voter who makes up the majority of this forum... Do you have 6 foot arms? You must because you pat yourself on the back constantly and yet everyone else thinks you're a fool. BTW, I am still waiting on those numbers from the millionaire tax. The analysis seemed to leave that part out. LOL Carry on. Edited September 23, 2016 by racer254 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted September 23, 2016 Share Posted September 23, 2016 2 minutes ago, SnowRider said: The link is there Not only am I one of the smartest posters on the forum - I'm also one of the calmest. It's apparent the hypocrisy and manipulation of a Rump Pumper has been exposed this morning. It's what I do and I'm good at it . Can you direct me to the area of the forum where Dump's policies have been discussed in detail, supported by independent analysis, and are good for the average middle-class to upper middle-class voter who makes up the majority of this forum... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted September 23, 2016 Share Posted September 23, 2016 1 minute ago, SnowRider said: The link is there Not only am I one of the smartest posters on the forum - I'm also one of the calmest. It's apparent the hypocrisy and manipulation of a Rump Pumper has been exposed this morning. It's what I do and I'm good at it . Can you direct me to the area of the forum where Dump's policies have been discussed in detail, supported by independent analysis, and are good for the average middle-class to upper middle-class voter who makes up the majority of this forum... Spare me. "one of the smartest". Holy shit! Not only have you proven to me that you really do not understand most of what is in your links, you don't even get what little analysis you "contribute" to it correct. Don't make me embarrass you...you've made some nice strides over the last day or so. Don't slide back now out of simple frustration that nobody here agrees with you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted September 23, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 23, 2016 (edited) 2 hours ago, SnowRider said: The totality: Hillary Clinton wants roughly $550 billion in new taxes and fees over the next decade – affecting investment partnerships, large estates and banks – that have received little to no public discussion from her campaign, a report from a Washington-based policy group shows. The new proposals, detailed in a report by the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, include plans for increasing the estate tax to a top rate of 65 percent on the very largest estates, levying a “risk fee” that would average about 0.13 percent on banks’ taxable assets and curbing a technique real-estate investors use to minimize their tax bills. The millionaire tax is included in the $550 billion. But if you want the details: http://taxfoundation.org/article/details-and-analysis-hillary-clinton-s-tax-proposals Fuck dude you are an idiot. That link is nothing but negative on Clinton's tax plan. They show the plan taking in $550 billion from the wealthy but it only netting $181 billion ($18 billion a year) due to lost economic activity. Who the fuck do you think that hurts? Yeah you're the smartest guy on here. HM Drops mic and walks off stage. Economic Impact According to the Tax Foundation’s Taxes and Growth Model, Hillary Clinton’s tax plan would reduce the economy’s size by 1 percent in the long run. The plan would lead to 0.8 percent lower wages, a 2.8 percent smaller capital stock, and 311,000 fewer full-time equivalent jobs. The smaller economy results from somewhat higher marginal tax rates on capital and labor income. Table 3. Economic Impact of Hillary Clinton’s Tax Proposals GDP -1.0% Capital Investment -2.8% Wage Rate -0.8% Full-time Equivalent Jobs (in thousands) -311 Source: Tax Foundation Taxes and Growth Model, October 2015. Edited September 23, 2016 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted September 23, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 23, 2016 7 minutes ago, Highmark said: Fuck dude you are an idiot. That link is nothing but negative on Clinton's tax plan. Economic Impact According to the Tax Foundation’s Taxes and Growth Model, Hillary Clinton’s tax plan would reduce the economy’s size by 1 percent in the long run. The plan would lead to 0.8 percent lower wages, a 2.8 percent smaller capital stock, and 311,000 fewer full-time equivalent jobs. The smaller economy results from somewhat higher marginal tax rates on capital and labor income. Table 3. Economic Impact of Hillary Clinton’s Tax Proposals GDP -1.0% Capital Investment -2.8% Wage Rate -0.8% Full-time Equivalent Jobs (in thousands) -311 Source: Tax Foundation Taxes and Growth Model, October 2015. Bahahahahahahahaha!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted September 23, 2016 Share Posted September 23, 2016 19 minutes ago, Highmark said: Fuck dude you are an idiot. That link is nothing but negative on Clinton's tax plan. They show the plan taking in $550 billion from the wealthy but it only netting $181 billion ($18 billion a year) due to lost economic activity. Who the fuck do you think that hurts? Yeah you're the smartest guy on here. HM Drops mic and walks off stage. Economic Impact According to the Tax Foundation’s Taxes and Growth Model, Hillary Clinton’s tax plan would reduce the economy’s size by 1 percent in the long run. The plan would lead to 0.8 percent lower wages, a 2.8 percent smaller capital stock, and 311,000 fewer full-time equivalent jobs. The smaller economy results from somewhat higher marginal tax rates on capital and labor income. Table 3. Economic Impact of Hillary Clinton’s Tax Proposals GDP -1.0% Capital Investment -2.8% Wage Rate -0.8% Full-time Equivalent Jobs (in thousands) -311 Source: Tax Foundation Taxes and Growth Model, October 2015. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted September 23, 2016 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 23, 2016 22 minutes ago, Highmark said: Fuck dude you are an idiot. That link is nothing but negative on Clinton's tax plan. They show the plan taking in $550 billion from the wealthy but it only netting $181 billion ($18 billion a year) due to lost economic activity. Who the fuck do you think that hurts? Yeah you're the smartest guy on here. HM Drops mic and walks off stage. Economic Impact According to the Tax Foundation’s Taxes and Growth Model, Hillary Clinton’s tax plan would reduce the economy’s size by 1 percent in the long run. The plan would lead to 0.8 percent lower wages, a 2.8 percent smaller capital stock, and 311,000 fewer full-time equivalent jobs. The smaller economy results from somewhat higher marginal tax rates on capital and labor income. Table 3. Economic Impact of Hillary Clinton’s Tax Proposals GDP -1.0% Capital Investment -2.8% Wage Rate -0.8% Full-time Equivalent Jobs (in thousands) -311 Source: Tax Foundation Taxes and Growth Model, October 2015. No. The link is from before - when she proposed 498b in new revenue. Now it's 550b - being responsible and getting close to a balanced budget proposal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted September 23, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 23, 2016 (edited) 19 minutes ago, SnowRider said: No. The link is from before - when she proposed 498b in new revenue. Now it's 550b - being responsible and getting close to a balanced budget proposal. So that extra $5.2 billion in revenue is somehow going to reverse all the negative effects. It will only increase them, take your ownage like a man sno. Edited September 23, 2016 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted September 23, 2016 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 23, 2016 53 minutes ago, Highmark said: So that extra $5.2 billion in revenue is somehow going to reverse all the negative effects. It will only increase them, take your ownage like a man sno. 52B Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted September 23, 2016 Share Posted September 23, 2016 3 minutes ago, SnowRider said: 52B 1/8th of what they gave Iran Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oleroule Posted September 23, 2016 Share Posted September 23, 2016 (edited) 8 minutes ago, SnowRider said: 52B why cheer? it's not the government's money...it's ours. Edited September 23, 2016 by oleroule Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted September 23, 2016 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 23, 2016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
01mxz800 Posted September 23, 2016 Share Posted September 23, 2016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted September 23, 2016 Share Posted September 23, 2016 3 minutes ago, 01mxz800 said: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted September 23, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 23, 2016 (edited) 4 hours ago, SnowRider said: 52B Per decade you stupid fuck. The $498 to 550 billion was over 10 years. No wonder you like it so much you thought it was per year. Whats 52÷10? Edited September 23, 2016 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtnloverxtreme2 Posted September 23, 2016 Share Posted September 23, 2016 (edited) http://listverse.com/2016/09/23/10-dark-secrets-of-hillary-clinton/ a little bit of fluff about the transtesticle murderous cunt. sweet jesu s! when the fuck is she going to die? Edited September 23, 2016 by mtnloverxtreme2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted September 26, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 26, 2016 And sno is going around calling people dumb and saying he is the smartest guy on the forum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted September 26, 2016 Share Posted September 26, 2016 Absolutely zero 'left-wing' about that asshat. He's a neoliberal cunt just like the rest of you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted September 26, 2016 Share Posted September 26, 2016 3 hours ago, motonoggin said: Absolutely zero 'left-wing' about that asshat. He's a neoliberal cunt just like the rest of you NeoStoner what a clown you are Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted September 26, 2016 Share Posted September 26, 2016 Just now, Momorider said: NeoStoner what a clown you are Says another neoliberal cunt in defense of other neoliberal cunts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted September 26, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 26, 2016 3 hours ago, motonoggin said: Absolutely zero 'left-wing' about that asshat. He's a neoliberal cunt just like the rest of you Are you a full on socialist or how would you describe yourself? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted September 26, 2016 Share Posted September 26, 2016 7 minutes ago, motonoggin said: Says another neoliberal cunt in defense of other neoliberal cunts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.