motonoggin Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 https://theintercept.com/2018/12/01/the-ignored-legacy-of-george-h-w-bush-war-crimes-racism-and-obstruction-of-justice/ THE TRIBUTES TOformer President George H.W. Bush, who died on Friday aged 94, have been pouring in from all sides of the political spectrum. He was a man “of the highest character,” said his eldest son and fellow former president, George W. Bush. “He loved America and served with character, class, and integrity,” tweeted former U.S. Attorney and #Resistance icon Preet Bharara. According to another former president, Barack Obama, Bush’s life was “a testament to the notion that public service is a noble, joyous calling. And he did tremendous good along the journey.” Apple boss Tim Cook said: “We have lost a great American.” In the age of Donald Trump, it isn’t difficult for hagiographers of the late Bush Sr. to paint a picture of him as a great patriot and pragmatist; a president who governed with “class” and “integrity.” It is true that the former president refused to vote for Trump in 2016, calling him a “blowhard,” and that he eschewed the white nationalist, “alt-right,” conspiratorial politics that has come to define the modern Republican Party. He helped end the Cold War without, as Obama said, “firing a shot.” He spent his life serving his country — from the military to Congress to the United Nations to the CIA to the White House. And, by all accounts, he was also a beloved grandfather and great-grandfather to his 17 grandkids and eight great-grandkids. Nevertheless, he was a public, not a private, figure — one of only 44 men to have ever served as president of the United States. We cannot, therefore, allow his actual record in office to be beautified in such a brazen way. “When a political leader dies, it is irresponsible in the extreme to demand that only praise be permitted but not criticisms,” as my colleague Glenn Greenwald has argued, because it leads to “false history and a propagandistic whitewashing of bad acts.” The inconvenient truth is that the presidency of George Herbert Walker Bush had far more in common with the recognizably belligerent, corrupt, and right-wing Republican figures who came after him — his son George W. and the current orange-faced incumbent — than much of the political and media classes might have you believe. Consider: He ran a racist election campaign. The name of Willie Horton should forever be associated with Bush’s 1988 presidential bid. Horton, who was serving a life sentence for murder in Massachusetts — where Bush’s Democratic opponent, Michael Dukakis, was governor — had fled a weekend furlough program and raped a Maryland woman. A notorious television ad called “Weekend Passes,” released by a political action committee with ties to the Bush campaign, made clear to viewers that Horton was black and his victim was white. As Bush campaign director Lee Atwater bragged, “By the time we’re finished, they’re going to wonder whether Willie Horton is Dukakis’s running mate.” Bush himself was quick to dismiss accusations of racism as “absolutely ridiculous,” yet it was clear at the time — even to right-wing Republican operatives such as Roger Stone, now a close ally of Trump — that the ad had crossed a line. “You and George Bush will wear that to your grave,” Stone complained to Atwater. “It’s a racist ad. … You’re going to regret it.” Stone was right about Atwater, who on his deathbed apologized for using Horton against Dukakis. But Bush never did. He made a dishonest case for war. Thirteen years before George W. Bush lied about weapons of mass destruction to justify his invasion and occupation of Iraq, his father made his own set of false claims to justify the aerial bombardment of that same country. The first Gulf War, as an investigation by journalist Joshua Keating concluded, “was sold on a mountain of war propaganda.” For a start, Bush told the American public that Iraq had invaded Kuwait “without provocation or warning.” What he omitted to mention was that the U.S. ambassador to Iraq, April Glaspie, had given an effective green light to Saddam Hussein, telling him in July 1990, a week before his invasion, “[W]e have no opinion on the Arab-Arab conflicts, like your border disagreement with Kuwait.” Then there is the fabrication of intelligence. Bush deployed U.S. troops to the Gulf in August 1990 and claimed that he was doing so in order “to assist the Saudi Arabian Government in the defense of its homeland.” As Scott Peterson wrote in the Christian Science Monitor in 2002, “Citing top-secret satellite images, Pentagon officials estimated … that up to 250,000 Iraqi troops and 1,500 tanks stood on the border, threatening the key U.S. oil supplier.” Yet when reporter Jean Heller of the St. Petersburg Times acquired her own commercial satellite images of the Saudi border, she found no signs of Iraqi forces; only an empty desert. “It was a pretty serious fib,” Heller toldPeterson, adding: “That [Iraqi buildup] was the whole justification for Bush sending troops in there, and it just didn’t exist.” He committed war crimes. Under Bush Sr., the U.S. dropped a whopping 88,500 tons of bombs on Iraq and Iraqi-occupied Kuwait, many of which resulted in horrific civilian casualties. In February 1991, for example, a U.S. airstrike on an air-raid shelter in the Amiriyah neighborhood of Baghdad killed at least 408 Iraqi civilians. According to Human Rights Watch, the Pentagon knew the Amiriyah facility had been used as a civil defense shelter during the Iran-Iraq war and yet had attacked without warning. It was, concluded HRW, “a serious violation of the laws of war.” More at the link. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 2 minutes ago, motonoggin said: https://theintercept.com/2018/12/01/the-ignored-legacy-of-george-h-w-bush-war-crimes-racism-and-obstruction-of-justice/ THE TRIBUTES TOformer President George H.W. Bush, who died on Friday aged 94, have been pouring in from all sides of the political spectrum. He was a man “of the highest character,” said his eldest son and fellow former president, George W. Bush. “He loved America and served with character, class, and integrity,” tweeted former U.S. Attorney and #Resistance icon Preet Bharara. According to another former president, Barack Obama, Bush’s life was “a testament to the notion that public service is a noble, joyous calling. And he did tremendous good along the journey.” Apple boss Tim Cook said: “We have lost a great American.” In the age of Donald Trump, it isn’t difficult for hagiographers of the late Bush Sr. to paint a picture of him as a great patriot and pragmatist; a president who governed with “class” and “integrity.” It is true that the former president refused to vote for Trump in 2016, calling him a “blowhard,” and that he eschewed the white nationalist, “alt-right,” conspiratorial politics that has come to define the modern Republican Party. He helped end the Cold War without, as Obama said, “firing a shot.” He spent his life serving his country — from the military to Congress to the United Nations to the CIA to the White House. And, by all accounts, he was also a beloved grandfather and great-grandfather to his 17 grandkids and eight great-grandkids. Nevertheless, he was a public, not a private, figure — one of only 44 men to have ever served as president of the United States. We cannot, therefore, allow his actual record in office to be beautified in such a brazen way. “When a political leader dies, it is irresponsible in the extreme to demand that only praise be permitted but not criticisms,” as my colleague Glenn Greenwald has argued, because it leads to “false history and a propagandistic whitewashing of bad acts.” The inconvenient truth is that the presidency of George Herbert Walker Bush had far more in common with the recognizably belligerent, corrupt, and right-wing Republican figures who came after him — his son George W. and the current orange-faced incumbent — than much of the political and media classes might have you believe. Consider: He ran a racist election campaign. The name of Willie Horton should forever be associated with Bush’s 1988 presidential bid. Horton, who was serving a life sentence for murder in Massachusetts — where Bush’s Democratic opponent, Michael Dukakis, was governor — had fled a weekend furlough program and raped a Maryland woman. A notorious television ad called “Weekend Passes,” released by a political action committee with ties to the Bush campaign, made clear to viewers that Horton was black and his victim was white. As Bush campaign director Lee Atwater bragged, “By the time we’re finished, they’re going to wonder whether Willie Horton is Dukakis’s running mate.” Bush himself was quick to dismiss accusations of racism as “absolutely ridiculous,” yet it was clear at the time — even to right-wing Republican operatives such as Roger Stone, now a close ally of Trump — that the ad had crossed a line. “You and George Bush will wear that to your grave,” Stone complained to Atwater. “It’s a racist ad. … You’re going to regret it.” Stone was right about Atwater, who on his deathbed apologized for using Horton against Dukakis. But Bush never did. He made a dishonest case for war. Thirteen years before George W. Bush lied about weapons of mass destruction to justify his invasion and occupation of Iraq, his father made his own set of false claims to justify the aerial bombardment of that same country. The first Gulf War, as an investigation by journalist Joshua Keating concluded, “was sold on a mountain of war propaganda.” For a start, Bush told the American public that Iraq had invaded Kuwait “without provocation or warning.” What he omitted to mention was that the U.S. ambassador to Iraq, April Glaspie, had given an effective green light to Saddam Hussein, telling him in July 1990, a week before his invasion, “[W]e have no opinion on the Arab-Arab conflicts, like your border disagreement with Kuwait.” Then there is the fabrication of intelligence. Bush deployed U.S. troops to the Gulf in August 1990 and claimed that he was doing so in order “to assist the Saudi Arabian Government in the defense of its homeland.” As Scott Peterson wrote in the Christian Science Monitor in 2002, “Citing top-secret satellite images, Pentagon officials estimated … that up to 250,000 Iraqi troops and 1,500 tanks stood on the border, threatening the key U.S. oil supplier.” Yet when reporter Jean Heller of the St. Petersburg Times acquired her own commercial satellite images of the Saudi border, she found no signs of Iraqi forces; only an empty desert. “It was a pretty serious fib,” Heller toldPeterson, adding: “That [Iraqi buildup] was the whole justification for Bush sending troops in there, and it just didn’t exist.” He committed war crimes. Under Bush Sr., the U.S. dropped a whopping 88,500 tons of bombs on Iraq and Iraqi-occupied Kuwait, many of which resulted in horrific civilian casualties. In February 1991, for example, a U.S. airstrike on an air-raid shelter in the Amiriyah neighborhood of Baghdad killed at least 408 Iraqi civilians. According to Human Rights Watch, the Pentagon knew the Amiriyah facility had been used as a civil defense shelter during the Iran-Iraq war and yet had attacked without warning. It was, concluded HRW, “a serious violation of the laws of war.” More at the link. America needs its heroes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted December 2, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 2, 2018 2 minutes ago, ActionfigureJoe said: America needs its heroes. You need a running vehicle and closed garage door. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 5 minutes ago, Jimmy Snacks said: You need a running vehicle and closed garage door. Good morning, cervix Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted December 2, 2018 Author Share Posted December 2, 2018 He refused to cooperate with a special counsel. The Iran-Contra affair, in which the United States traded missiles for Americans hostages in Iran, and used the proceeds of those arms sales to fund Contra rebels in Nicaragua, did much to undermine the presidency of Ronald Reagan. Yet his vice president’s involvement in that controversial affair has garnered far less attention. “The criminal investigation of Bush was regrettably incomplete,” wrote Special Counsel Lawrence Walsh, a former deputy attorney general in the Eisenhower administration, in his final report on the Iran-Contra affair in August 1993. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted December 2, 2018 Author Share Posted December 2, 2018 Why? Because Bush, who was “fully aware of the Iran arms sale,” according to the special counsel, failed to hand over a diary “containing contemporaneous notes relevant to Iran/contra” and refused to be interviewed in the later stages of the investigation. In the final days of his presidency, Bush even issued pardonsto six defendants in the Iran-Contra affair, including former Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger — on the eve of Weinberger’s trial for perjury and obstruction of justice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted December 2, 2018 Author Share Posted December 2, 2018 He escalated the racist war on drugs. In September 1989, in a televised addressto the nation from the Oval Office, Bush held up a bag of crack cocaine, which he said had been “seized a few days ago in a park across the street from the White House . … It could easily have been heroin or PCP.” Yet a Washington Post investigationlater that month revealed that federal agents had “lured” the drug dealer to Lafayette Park so that they could make an “undercover crack buy in a park better known for its location across Pennsylvania Avenue from the White House than for illegal drug activity” (the dealer didn’t know where the White House was and even asked the agents for directions). Bush cynically used this prop — the bag of crack — to call for a $1.5 billion increase in spending on the drug war, declaiming: “We need more prisons, more jails, more courts, more prosecutors.” The result? “Millions of Americans were incarcerated, hundreds of billions of dollars wasted, and hundreds of thousands of human beings allowed to die of AIDS — all in the name of a ‘war on drugs’ that did nothing to reduce drug abuse,” pointed out Ethan Nadelmann, founder of the Drug Policy Alliance, in 2014. Bush, he argued, “put ideology and politics above science and health.” Today, even leading Republicans, such as Chris Christie and Rand Paul, agree that the war on drugs, ramped up by Bush during his four years in the White House, has been a dismal and racist failure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted December 2, 2018 Author Share Posted December 2, 2018 Facts matter. The 41st president of the United States was not the last Republican moderate or a throwback to an imagined age of conservative decency and civility; he engaged in race baiting, obstruction of justice, and war crimes. He had much more in common with the two Republican presidents who came after him than his current crop of fans would like us to believe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mileage Psycho Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 3 minutes ago, motonoggin said: Why? Because Bush, who was “fully aware of the Iran arms sale,” according to the special counsel, failed to hand over a diary “containing contemporaneous notes relevant to Iran/contra” and refused to be interviewed in the later stages of the investigation. In the final days of his presidency, Bush even issued pardonsto six defendants in the Iran-Contra affair, including former Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger — on the eve of Weinberger’s trial for perjury and obstruction of justice. The idea and process to sell weapons to Iran fund a proxy war in C.A. saved taxpayers money, ingenious really. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted December 2, 2018 Author Share Posted December 2, 2018 2 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said: The idea and process to sell weapons to Iran fund a proxy war in C.A. saved taxpayers money, ingenious really. Yeah, ingenious and treason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mileage Psycho Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 2 minutes ago, motonoggin said: Yeah, ingenious and treason. Ingenious nonetheless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said: Ingenious nonetheless. You're a fucking moron...seriously Tell us more about tariffs being inflationary Edited December 2, 2018 by f7ben Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 12 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said: Ingenious nonetheless. You’re a clown 9 minutes ago, f7ben said: You're a fucking moron...seriously Tell us more about tariffs being inflationary It’s absolutely amazing to me how these people are so blind to the dirtyness of these politicians. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 7 minutes ago, jtssrx said: You’re a clown It’s absolutely amazing to me how these people are so blind to the dirtyness of these politicians. Trump says he's a great american. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 6 minutes ago, ActionfigureJoe said: Trump says he's a great american. And Trump is a piece of trash...what's your point Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 Selling weapons to our sworn enemy Iran thru... ISRAEL! The other sworn enemy of Iran! And many here think it was good for the time! You can't make this shit up! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 2 minutes ago, Anler said: Selling weapons to our sworn enemy Iran thru... ISRAEL! The other sworn enemy of Iran! And many here think it was good for the time! You can't make this shit up! IT WAS INGENIOUS!!!111 DERP DERP DAGO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 Just now, f7ben said: IT WAS INGENIOUS!!!111 DERP DERP DAGO It saved us money! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 2 hours ago, motonoggin said: Facts matter. The 41st president of the United States was not the last Republican moderate or a throwback to an imagined age of conservative decency and civility; he engaged in race baiting, obstruction of justice, and war crimes. He had much more in common with the two Republican presidents who came after him than his current crop of fans would like us to believe. butt hurt noted Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted December 2, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 2, 2018 (edited) 2 hours ago, jtssrx said: You’re a clown It’s absolutely amazing to me how these people are so blind to the dirtyness of these politicians. I might be a moron but I refuse to be lectured to by a flat earth fucktard!!!!!!😂 Edited December 2, 2018 by Jimmy Snacks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted December 2, 2018 Author Share Posted December 2, 2018 (edited) Shit bootlickers say: Edited December 2, 2018 by motonoggin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 That is every bootlicking retard here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 I hate the Bushes. This old bastard is the one that got us into 28 years of lost national wealth in the stinking, dusty, dirty deserts of the Middle Fukken East. I evan hate the old bitch Barbara, 'cause she was the matriarch of that evil clan. Without her smelly gash, we would not have had that most rotten son of hers GWB. They have done grievous harm to America, and they got away with it. They picked on THIRD-RATE military countries, but they NEVER took on RUSSIA or CHINA!! Why didn't the fukken Bushes take on the BIG BOYS? Fukken Boston Brahmin, fronting as Texas oil men. Sons of bitches of humanity. Go ahead praise the fukker, just like they did for McCain. What a fukken shame God didn't take these fukkers out years ago. Rotten people live forever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 550s best post ever Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted December 2, 2018 Share Posted December 2, 2018 18 minutes ago, f7ben said: 550s best post ever Ingenious! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.