Rod Posted June 10, 2018 Share Posted June 10, 2018 Wtf liberals can go fuck themselves. MADD can suck ten bags of dicks too https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.4699759 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted June 10, 2018 Share Posted June 10, 2018 If you have done nothing wrong you have nothing to hide! Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot Posted June 10, 2018 Share Posted June 10, 2018 2 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: If you have done nothing wrong you have nothing to hide! Neal The article states that she hadn't done anything wrong, (hence why the judge threw the case out)... Yet was still arrested. That's the problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted June 10, 2018 Share Posted June 10, 2018 Just now, Whiskey Tango Foxtrot said: The article states that she hadn't done anything wrong, (hence why the judge threw the case out)... Yet was still arrested. That's the problem. She was drinking and driving, that's against the law... Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted June 10, 2018 Author Share Posted June 10, 2018 (edited) 2 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: She was drinking and driving, that's against the law... Neal Not the point—- and it was the morning after. The cop had zero reason to believe she was intoxicated by her actions and couldn’t smell alcohol either. But tested her for fun. Liberals are trying to cram legislation trough that makes warrantless, baseless searches legal so they can get away with it. Edited June 10, 2018 by Rod Johnson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot Posted June 10, 2018 Share Posted June 10, 2018 She was on her way home, the morning after consuming at a friend's house. Officer admitted no irregularities in her driving or smell in the vehicle. You didn't read the article, did you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted June 10, 2018 Share Posted June 10, 2018 10 minutes ago, Rod Johnson said: Not the point—- and it was the morning after. The cop had zero reason to believe she was intoxicated by her actions and couldn’t smell alcohol either. But tested her for fun. Liberals are trying to cram legislation trough that makes warrantless, baseless searches legal so they can get away with it. She was doing something wrong, the issue is how does your silly government go about finding out. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted June 10, 2018 Share Posted June 10, 2018 9 minutes ago, Whiskey Tango Foxtrot said: She was on her way home, the morning after consuming at a friend's house. Officer admitted no irregularities in her driving or smell in the vehicle. You didn't read the article, did you? Yes, I did read it. The article never mentioned the BAC. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted June 10, 2018 Author Share Posted June 10, 2018 5 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: She was doing something wrong, the issue is how does your silly government go about finding out. Neal Technically illegal, not necessarily wrong. And they had no way of proving it without an illegal search. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted June 10, 2018 Share Posted June 10, 2018 Just now, Rod Johnson said: Technically illegal, not necessarily wrong. And they had no way of proving it without an illegal search. Wrong in the legal sense, not moral. Keep up. Illegal search is irrelevant if she did no wrong!!!!!1111 Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin_dry Posted June 10, 2018 Share Posted June 10, 2018 No doubt there’s more to this story. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted June 10, 2018 Author Share Posted June 10, 2018 Just now, NaturallyAspirated said: Wrong in the legal sense, not moral. Keep up. Illegal search is irrelevant if she did no wrong!!!!!1111 Neal Illegal and wrong are not synonymous illegal search isn’t irrelevant at this point that’s why the judge through it out—- unless the liberals get their fascist legislation through 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin_dry Posted June 10, 2018 Share Posted June 10, 2018 If a person has does nothing wrong than there’s nothing to worry about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin_dry Posted June 10, 2018 Share Posted June 10, 2018 4 minutes ago, Rod Johnson said: Illegal and wrong are not synonymous illegal search isn’t irrelevant at this point that’s why the judge through it out—- unless the liberals get their fascist legislation through She might’ve been black. In your world that makes her subhuman and not subject to the rights you enjoy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted June 10, 2018 Author Share Posted June 10, 2018 23 minutes ago, spin_dry said: She might’ve been black. In your world that makes her subhuman and not subject to the rights you enjoy. Wrong equality under the law and otherwise something you alt leftists don’t believe in Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted June 10, 2018 Share Posted June 10, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, Rod Johnson said: Wtf liberals can go fuck themselves. MADD can suck ten bags of dicks too https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.4699759 Harper wanted Random searching of homes allowed - you cheered as you are scared of the Muslim Man ONEWAY Edited June 10, 2018 by 1trailmaker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtnloverxtreme2 Posted June 10, 2018 Share Posted June 10, 2018 1 hour ago, NaturallyAspirated said: If you have done nothing wrong you have nothing to hide! Neal ok neal. how about this, you get a speeding ticket or some such thing and have a tiff with a cop. he would, with all the backing of the NSDAP be able to pull you over for shits and giggles from then on. suspicion of a lawbreaker, (weaving etc) ok. but not just because i gave a cop a dirty look or he doesn't like my bike/car/truck/face. and i have better things to do than talk to fat heads 'just because. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted June 10, 2018 Share Posted June 10, 2018 2 hours ago, Rod Johnson said: Illegal and wrong are not synonymous illegal search isn’t irrelevant at this point that’s why the judge through it out—- unless the liberals get their fascist legislation through Indeed, which is why you must use logic and reasoning. If you fail to do so, and be pedantic, you look stupid. It is irrelevant to the quote I memed, that originated from the conservatives during the 9/11 aftermath. Are you able to keep up, you seem to be struggling. I can continue to provide the descriptive training wheels if you require. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted June 10, 2018 Share Posted June 10, 2018 33 minutes ago, mtnloverxtreme2 said: ok neal. how about this, you get a speeding ticket or some such thing and have a tiff with a cop. he would, with all the backing of the NSDAP be able to pull you over for shits and giggles from then on. suspicion of a lawbreaker, (weaving etc) ok. but not just because i gave a cop a dirty look or he doesn't like my bike/car/truck/face. and i have better things to do than talk to fat heads 'just because. You do realize I was mocking the conservative meme that came about after the 9/11 attack, right? Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtnloverxtreme2 Posted June 10, 2018 Share Posted June 10, 2018 5 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: You do realize I was mocking the conservative meme that came about after the 9/11 attack, right? Neal hahaha. ok then. thought you may have gone soft in the head for a minute Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted June 10, 2018 Author Share Posted June 10, 2018 1 hour ago, NaturallyAspirated said: Indeed, which is why you must use logic and reasoning. If you fail to do so, and be pedantic, you look stupid. It is irrelevant to the quote I memed, that originated from the conservatives during the 9/11 aftermath. Are you able to keep up, you seem to be struggling. I can continue to provide the descriptive training wheels if you require. Neal We learned from the mistakes of the era. You obviously haven’t 🍻 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted June 10, 2018 Author Share Posted June 10, 2018 2 hours ago, 1trailmaker said: Harper wanted Random searching of homes allowed - you cheered as you are scared of the Muslim Man ONEWAY And you can’t criticize you’re boyfriend even though he wants to have warrantless baseless searches of your person for THC residue oops Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted June 10, 2018 Share Posted June 10, 2018 (edited) 39 minutes ago, Rod Johnson said: And you can’t criticize you’re boyfriend even though he wants to have warrantless baseless searches of your person for THC residue oops I have never really supported RIDE checks and most likely never will - but they will not be going away anytime soon. I am against random checks Also against the sale of Hydro And many other things How about you ONEWAY I watched you for a decade defending Harper's every move and now against Trudeau's every move. SAD Edited June 10, 2018 by 1trailmaker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted June 10, 2018 Author Share Posted June 10, 2018 27 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said: I have never really supported RIDE checks and most likely never will - but they will not be going away anytime soon. I am against random checks Also against the sale of Hydro And many other things How about you ONEWAY I watched you for a decade defending Harper's every move and now against Trudeau's every move. SAD I would easily vote liberal if Harper was their leader Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted June 10, 2018 Share Posted June 10, 2018 13 minutes ago, Rod Johnson said: I would easily vote liberal if Harper was their leader Forget Harper, his numbers were not that good - move on Andrew is your new guy, you will vote for him and the next leader that replaces him and the next and so on who are you kidding Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.