Trudope was too late with his carbon tax.........

[ArcticCrusher]

15 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

Only a bonehead would not see this as very suspect considering the timing.

 

https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/oil-sands-greenhouse-gas-emissions-significantly-underestimated-study-1.1248163

 

3 minutes ago, revkevsdi said:

You and dumpy will be claiming Bloomberg are far right shills. 

 

Exhibit "A"   ^^^^^^^^^^

[ArcticCrusher]

Just now, irv said:

You working on coming up with your own thoughts on how a carbon tax is going to help stop forest fires, heat waves, droughts and floods or are you just ignoring my post because you have nothing?  

 

 

The climate is changing.  Oh noes.  Can't have that.  Pretty sure carbon taxing the dinosaurs would have stopped the ice ages from occurring and re-occurring over and over again.

[irv]

1 minute ago, ArcticCrusher said:

 

 

The climate is changing.  Oh noes.  Can't have that.  Pretty sure carbon taxing the dinosaurs would have stopped the ice ages from occurring and re-occurring over and over again.

I know, eh. I have always wondered why the cavemen never taxed those creatures. If we could only go back in time!! 

[revkevsdi]

2 minutes ago, irv said:

You working on coming up with your own thoughts on how a carbon tax is going to help stop forest fires, heat waves, droughts and floods or are you just ignoring my post because you have nothing?  

Why would I have to come up with my own research when the peer reviewed work of economists explains it?  

Far more dangerous than every kid getting a trophy is the thought that everyone is a scientist. 

You put more stock in a meme from a football player than a scientist.  

You cherry pick the work of debunked scientists paid by the fossil fuel industry instead of the consensus reached by the scientific community. 

That’s not free thinking, that’s stupid. 

Are you also a birther and anti vaxxer?

What are you thoughts on smoking? Do you still believe the scientists that the tobacco companies hired?

[ArcticCrusher]

9 minutes ago, irv said:

I know, eh. I have always wondered why the cavemen never taxed those creatures. If we could only go back in time!! 

These idiots have zero clue just how extreme the climate has been in the past.  But 97% of climate scientists say . . .

Fuck off already.

[ArcticCrusher]

9 minutes ago, revkevsdi said:

Why would I have to come up with my own research when the peer reviewed work of economists explains it?  

Far more dangerous than every kid getting a trophy is the thought that everyone is a scientist. 

You put more stock in a meme from a football player than a scientist.  

You cherry pick the work of debunked scientists paid by the fossil fuel industry instead of the consensus reached by the scientific community. 

That’s not free thinking, that’s stupid. 

Are you also a birther and anti vaxxer?

What are you thoughts on smoking? Do you still believe the scientists that the tobacco companies hired?

Peer reviewed.

Circle jerk.

[Momorider]

21 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

Peer reviewed.

Circle jerk.

 

[irv]

41 minutes ago, revkevsdi said:

Why would I have to come up with my own research when the peer reviewed work of economists explains it?  

Far more dangerous than every kid getting a trophy is the thought that everyone is a scientist. 

You put more stock in a meme from a football player than a scientist.  

You cherry pick the work of debunked scientists paid by the fossil fuel industry instead of the consensus reached by the scientific community. 

That’s not free thinking, that’s stupid. 

Are you also a birther and anti vaxxer?

What are you thoughts on smoking? Do you still believe the scientists that the tobacco companies hired?

So, like a good little lamb, you just believe everything the left/climate alarmists tell you. Tell me, Kev, have you ever done any critical thinking of your own, ever looked at the big picture, looked back at climate history or ever wonder why nothing much has changed since this latest Global movement/hoax got started?

Were you aware back in the seventies it was the opposite hysteria/hoax and that another ice age was coming? 

To veterans of the Climate Wars, the old 1970s global cooling canard – “How can we believe climate scientists about global warming today when back in the 1970s they told us an ice age was imminent?”

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2008/03/the-global-cooling-mole/

 

Edited April 24, 2019 by irv

[revkevsdi]

17 minutes ago, irv said:

So, like a good little lamb, you just believe everything the left/climate alarmists tell you. Tell me, Kev, have you ever done any critical thinking of your own, ever looked at the big picture, looked back at climate history or ever wonder why nothing much has changed since this latest Global movement/hoax got started?

Were you aware back in the seventies it was the opposite hysteria/hoax and that another ice age was coming? 

To veterans of the Climate Wars, the old 1970s global cooling canard – “How can we believe climate scientists about global warming today when back in the 1970s they told us an ice age was imminent?”

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2008/03/the-global-cooling-mole/

 

Irv. You just owned yourself. 

You supplied an article from a well respected source, read the first paragraph and drew an incorrect conclusion. 

So

much for your critical thinking. 

You supplied the article as a means to prove that the scientific community were unanimous on a coming ice age. Yet you aren’t smart enough to read or understand the article. 

• 7 articles predicting cooling
• 44 predicting warming
• 20 that were neutral

In other words, during the 1970s, when some would have you believe scientists were predicting a coming ice age, they were doing no such thing. The dominant view, even then, was that increasing levels of greenhouse gases were likely to dominate any changes we might see in climate on human time scales.

We do not expect that this work will stop the mole from popping its head back up in the future. But we do hope that when it does, this analysis will provide a foundation for a more thoughtful discussion about what climate scientists were and were not saying back in the 1970s

That is from the article you linked.  

I can add to this that even Exxon knew climate change was real and spent 40 years fooling people like you. 

[revkevsdi]

54 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

Peer reviewed.

Circle jerk.

Your buddy Irv just kicked himself in the cunt. 

Nice work climate change deniers. 

[irv]

9 minutes ago, revkevsdi said:

Irv. You just owned yourself. 

You supplied an article from a well respected source, read the first paragraph and drew an incorrect conclusion. 

So

much for your critical thinking. 

You supplied the article as a means to prove that the scientific community were unanimous on a coming ice age. Yet you aren’t smart enough to read or understand the article. 

• 7 articles predicting cooling
• 44 predicting warming
• 20 that were neutral

In other words, during the 1970s, when some would have you believe scientists were predicting a coming ice age, they were doing no such thing. The dominant view, even then, was that increasing levels of greenhouse gases were likely to dominate any changes we might see in climate on human time scales.

We do not expect that this work will stop the mole from popping its head back up in the future. But we do hope that when it does, this analysis will provide a foundation for a more thoughtful discussion about what climate scientists were and were not saying back in the 1970s

That is from the article you linked.  

I can add to this that even Exxon knew climate change was real and spent 40 years fooling people like you. 

Whoosh! Right over your head! 97% of scientists believe Man Made Global Warming is real. 

[Highmark]

We'er all gonna die.  

[ArcticCrusher]

19 minutes ago, revkevsdi said:

Your buddy Irv just kicked himself in the cunt. 

Nice work climate change deniers. 

You're part of the stupid who believes you can stop climate from changing.

Get it straight.

[revkevsdi]

44 minutes ago, irv said:

Whoosh! Right over your head! 97% of scientists believe Man Made Global Warming is real. 

You just posted an article, drew the wrong conclusion and followed it up with a meme that supports your incorrect conclusion 

 

[revkevsdi]

36 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

You're part of the stupid who believes you can stop climate from changing.

Get it straight.

You are one of the dummies that think scientific studies peer reviewed by phd's are more suspect than ideology peer reviewed by morons like you Dumpy and Irv.  

Obviously your peers are as dumb as shit. 

[snopro31]

If it wasn’t so windy out today I’d go burn some garbage and a few tires in revs honor. 

[irv]

Yep, 97% of the "FUNDED" scientists believe Man Made Global Warming is real. 

Scientists questioning the accuracy of IPCC climate projections

These scientists have said that it is not possible to project global climate accurately enough to justify the ranges projected for temperature and sea-level rise over the 21st century. They may not conclude specifically that the current IPCC projections are either too high or too low, but that the projections are likely to be inaccurate due to inadequacies of current global climate modeling.

• David Bellamy, botanist.^{[19][20][21][22]}
• Lennart Bengtsson, meteorologist, Reading University.^[23][24]
• Piers Corbyn, owner of the business WeatherAction which makes weather forecasts.^[25][26]
• Susan Crockford, Zoologist, adjunct professor in Anthropology at the University of Victoria. ^[27][28][29]
• Judith Curry, professor and former chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology.^{[30][31][32][33]}
• Joseph D'Aleo, past Chairman American Meteorological Society's Committee on Weather Analysis and Forecasting, former Professor of Meteorology, Lyndon State College.^{[34][35][36][37]}
• Freeman Dyson, professor emeritus of the School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study; Fellow of the Royal Society.^[38][39]
• Ivar Giaever, Norwegian–American physicist and Nobel laureate in physics (1973).^[40]
• Steven E. Koonin, theoretical physicist and director of the Center for Urban Science and Progress at New York University.^[41][42]
• Richard Lindzen, Alfred P. Sloan emeritus professor of atmospheric science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and member of the National Academy of Sciences.^{[39][43][44][45]}
• Craig Loehle, ecologist and chief scientist at the National Council for Air and Stream Improvement.^{[46][47][48][49][50][51][52]}
• Ross McKitrick, professor of economics and CBE chair in sustainable commerce, University of Guelph.^[53][54]
• Patrick Moore, former president of Greenpeace Canada.^[55][56][57]
• Nils-Axel Mörner, retired head of the Paleogeophysics and Geodynamics Department at Stockholm University, former chairman of the INQUA Commission on Sea Level Changes and Coastal Evolution (1999–2003).^[58][59]
• Garth Paltridge, retired chief research scientist, CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research and retired director of the Institute of the Antarctic Cooperative Research Centre, visiting fellow Australian National University.^[60][61]
• Roger A. Pielke, Jr., professor of environmental studies at the Center for Science and Technology Policy Research at the University of Colorado at Boulder.^[62][63]
• Denis Rancourt, former professor of physics at University of Ottawa, research scientist in condensed matter physics, and in environmental and soil science.^{[64][65][66][67]}
• Harrison Schmitt, geologist, Apollo 17 astronaut, former US senator.^[68][69]
• Peter Stilbs, professor of physical chemistry at Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.^[70][71]
• Philip Stott, professor emeritus of biogeography at the University of London.^[72][73]
• Hendrik Tennekes, retired director of research, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute.^[74][75]
• Anastasios Tsonis, distinguished professor of atmospheric science at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.^[76][77]
• Fritz Vahrenholt, German politician and energy executive with a doctorate in chemistry.^[78][79]

Scientists arguing that global warming is primarily caused by natural processes

 

Graph showing the ability with which a global climate model is able to reconstruct the historical temperature record, and the degree to which those temperature changes can be decomposed into various forcing factors. It shows the effects of five forcing factors: greenhouse gases, man-made sulfate emissions, solar variability, ozone changes, and volcanic emissions.^[80]

These scientists have said that the observed warming is more likely to be attributable to natural causes than to human activities. Their views on climate change are usually described in more detail in their biographical articles.

• Khabibullo Abdusamatov, astrophysicist at Pulkovo Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences.^[81][82]
• Sallie Baliunas, retired astrophysicist, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.^[83][84][85]
• Timothy Ball, historical climatologist, and retired professor of geography at the University of Winnipeg.^[86][87][88]
• Ian Clark, hydrogeologist, professor, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa.^[89][90]
• Vincent Courtillot, geophysicist, member of the French Academy of Sciences.^[91]
• Doug Edmeades, soil scientist, officer of the New Zealand Order of Merit.^[92]
• David Douglass, solid-state physicist, professor, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester.^[93][94]
• Don Easterbrook, emeritus professor of geology, Western Washington University.^[95][96]
• William Happer, physicist specializing in optics and spectroscopy; emeritus professor, Princeton University.^[39][97]
• Victor Manuel Velasco Herrera, Theoretical Physicist and Researcher, Institute of Geophysics of the National Autonomous University of Mexico.^[98]
• Ole Humlum, professor of geology at the University of Oslo.^[99][100]
• Wibjörn Karlén, professor emeritus of geography and geology at the University of Stockholm.^[101][102]
• William Kininmonth, meteorologist, former Australian delegate to World Meteorological Organization Commission for Climatology.^[103][104]
• David Legates, associate professor of geography and director of the Center for Climatic Research, University of Delaware.^[105][106]
• Anthony Lupo, professor of atmospheric science at the University of Missouri.^[107][108]
• Jennifer Marohasy, an Australian biologist, former director of the Australian Environment Foundation.^[109][110]
• Tad Murty, oceanographer; adjunct professor, Departments of Civil Engineering and Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa.^[111][112]
• Tim Patterson, paleoclimatologist and professor of geology at Carleton University in Canada.^[113][114]
• Ian Plimer, professor emeritus of mining geology, the University of Adelaide.^[115][116]
• Arthur B. Robinson, American politician, biochemist and former faculty member at the University of California, San Diego.^[117][118]
• Murry Salby, atmospheric scientist, former professor at Macquarie University and University of Colorado.^[119][120]
• Nicola Scafetta, research scientist in the physics department at Duke University.^{[121][122][123]}
• Tom Segalstad, geologist; associate professor at University of Oslo.^[124][125]
• Nir Shaviv, professor of physics focusing on astrophysics and climate science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.^[126][127]
• Fred Singer, professor emeritus of environmental sciences at the University of Virginia.^{[128][129][130][131]}
• Willie Soon, astrophysicist, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.^[132][133]
• Roy Spencer, meteorologist; principal research scientist, University of Alabama in Huntsville.^[134][135]
• Henrik Svensmark, physicist, Danish National Space Center.^[136][137]
• George H. Taylor, retired director of the Oregon Climate Service at Oregon State University.^[138][139]
• Jan Veizer, environmental geochemist, professor emeritus from University of Ottawa.^[140][141]

Scientists arguing that the cause of global warming is unknown

These scientists have said that no principal cause can be ascribed to the observed rising temperatures, whether man-made or natural.

• Syun-Ichi Akasofu, retired professor of geophysics and founding director of the International Arctic Research Center of the University of Alaska Fairbanks.^[142][143]
• Claude Allègre, French politician; geochemist, emeritus professor at Institute of Geophysics (Paris).^[144][145]
• Robert Balling, a professor of geography at Arizona State University.^[146][147]
• Pål Brekke, solar astrophysicist, senior advisor Norwegian Space Centre.^[148][149]
• John Christy, professor of atmospheric science and director of the Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, contributor to several IPCC reports.^{[150][151][152]}
• Petr Chylek, space and remote sensing sciences researcher, Los Alamos National Laboratory.^[153][154]
• David Deming, geology professor at the University of Oklahoma.^[155][156]
• Stanley B. Goldenberg a meteorologist with NOAA/AOML's Hurricane Research Division.^[157][158]
• Keith E. Idso, botanist, former adjunct professor of biology at Maricopa County Community College District and the vice president of the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change.^[159][160]
• Kary Mullis, 1993 Nobel laureate in chemistry, inventor of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method.^{[161][162][163]}
• Antonino Zichichi, emeritus professor of nuclear physics at the University of Bologna and president of the World Federation of Scientists.^[164][165]

Scientists arguing that global warming will have few negative consequences

These scientists have said that projected rising temperatures will be of little impact or a net positive for society or the environment.

• Indur M. Goklany, electrical engineer, science and technology policy analyst for the United States Department of the Interior.^{[166][167][168]}
• Craig D. Idso, geographer, faculty researcher, Office of Climatology, Arizona State University and founder of the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change.^[169][170]
• Sherwood B. Idso, former research physicist, USDA Water Conservation Laboratory, and adjunct professor, Arizona State University.^[171][172]
• Patrick Michaels, senior fellow at the Cato Institute and retired research professor of environmental science at the University of Virginia.^[173][174]

Deceased scientists

These scientists published material indicating their opposition to the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming prior to their deaths.

• August H. "Augie" Auer Jr. (1940–2007), retired New Zealand MetService meteorologist and past professor of atmospheric science at the University of Wyoming.^[175][176]
• Reid Bryson (1920–2008), emeritus professor of atmospheric and oceanic sciences, University of Wisconsin–Madison.^[177][178]
• Robert M. Carter (1942–2016), former head of the School of Earth Sciences at James Cook University.^[179][180]
• Chris de Freitas (1948–2017), associate professor, School of Geography, Geology and Environmental Science, University of Auckland.^[181][182]
• Vincent R. Gray (1922–2018), New Zealand physical chemist with expertise in coal ashes.^[183][184]
• William M. Gray (1929–2016), professor emeritus and head of the Tropical Meteorology Project, Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University.^[185][186]
• Yuri Izrael (1930–2014), former chairman, Committee for Hydrometeorology (USSR); former director, Institute of Global Climate and Ecology (Russian Academy of Science); vice-chairman of IPCC, 2001–2007.^{[187][188][189]}
• Robert Jastrow (1925–2008), American astronomer, physicist, cosmologist and leading NASA scientist who, together with Fred Seitz and William Nierenberg, established the George C. Marshall Institute.^{[190][191][192]}
• Harold ("Hal") Warren Lewis (1923–2011), emeritus professor of physics and former department chairman at the University of California, Santa Barbara.^[193][194]
• Frederick Seitz (1911–2008), solid-state physicist, former president of the National Academy of Sciences and co-founder of the George C. Marshall Institute in 1984.^{[195][196][197]}

[ArcticCrusher]

1 hour ago, revkevsdi said:

You are one of the dummies that think scientific studies peer reviewed by phd's are more suspect than ideology peer reviewed by morons like you Dumpy and Irv.  

Obviously your peers are as dumb as shit. 

The carbon tax should have prevented this.

Moron.

Phd.

Peer review.

 

https://globalnews.ca/video/5198539/justin-trudeau-tours-gatineau-flood-evacuation-centre

[ArcticCrusher]

57 minutes ago, irv said:

Yep, 97% of the "FUNDED" scientists believe Man Made Global Warming is real. 

Scientists questioning the accuracy of IPCC climate projections

These scientists have said that it is not possible to project global climate accurately enough to justify the ranges projected for temperature and sea-level rise over the 21st century. They may not conclude specifically that the current IPCC projections are either too high or too low, but that the projections are likely to be inaccurate due to inadequacies of current global climate modeling.

• David Bellamy, botanist.^{[19][20][21][22]}
• Lennart Bengtsson, meteorologist, Reading University.^[23][24]
• Piers Corbyn, owner of the business WeatherAction which makes weather forecasts.^[25][26]
• Susan Crockford, Zoologist, adjunct professor in Anthropology at the University of Victoria. ^[27][28][29]
• Judith Curry, professor and former chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology.^{[30][31][32][33]}
• Joseph D'Aleo, past Chairman American Meteorological Society's Committee on Weather Analysis and Forecasting, former Professor of Meteorology, Lyndon State College.^{[34][35][36][37]}
• Freeman Dyson, professor emeritus of the School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study; Fellow of the Royal Society.^[38][39]
• Ivar Giaever, Norwegian–American physicist and Nobel laureate in physics (1973).^[40]
• Steven E. Koonin, theoretical physicist and director of the Center for Urban Science and Progress at New York University.^[41][42]
• Richard Lindzen, Alfred P. Sloan emeritus professor of atmospheric science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and member of the National Academy of Sciences.^{[39][43][44][45]}
• Craig Loehle, ecologist and chief scientist at the National Council for Air and Stream Improvement.^{[46][47][48][49][50][51][52]}
• Ross McKitrick, professor of economics and CBE chair in sustainable commerce, University of Guelph.^[53][54]
• Patrick Moore, former president of Greenpeace Canada.^[55][56][57]
• Nils-Axel Mörner, retired head of the Paleogeophysics and Geodynamics Department at Stockholm University, former chairman of the INQUA Commission on Sea Level Changes and Coastal Evolution (1999–2003).^[58][59]
• Garth Paltridge, retired chief research scientist, CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research and retired director of the Institute of the Antarctic Cooperative Research Centre, visiting fellow Australian National University.^[60][61]
• Roger A. Pielke, Jr., professor of environmental studies at the Center for Science and Technology Policy Research at the University of Colorado at Boulder.^[62][63]
• Denis Rancourt, former professor of physics at University of Ottawa, research scientist in condensed matter physics, and in environmental and soil science.^{[64][65][66][67]}
• Harrison Schmitt, geologist, Apollo 17 astronaut, former US senator.^[68][69]
• Peter Stilbs, professor of physical chemistry at Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.^[70][71]
• Philip Stott, professor emeritus of biogeography at the University of London.^[72][73]
• Hendrik Tennekes, retired director of research, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute.^[74][75]
• Anastasios Tsonis, distinguished professor of atmospheric science at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.^[76][77]
• Fritz Vahrenholt, German politician and energy executive with a doctorate in chemistry.^[78][79]

Scientists arguing that global warming is primarily caused by natural processes

 

Graph showing the ability with which a global climate model is able to reconstruct the historical temperature record, and the degree to which those temperature changes can be decomposed into various forcing factors. It shows the effects of five forcing factors: greenhouse gases, man-made sulfate emissions, solar variability, ozone changes, and volcanic emissions.^[80]

These scientists have said that the observed warming is more likely to be attributable to natural causes than to human activities. Their views on climate change are usually described in more detail in their biographical articles.

• Khabibullo Abdusamatov, astrophysicist at Pulkovo Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences.^[81][82]
• Sallie Baliunas, retired astrophysicist, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.^[83][84][85]
• Timothy Ball, historical climatologist, and retired professor of geography at the University of Winnipeg.^[86][87][88]
• Ian Clark, hydrogeologist, professor, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa.^[89][90]
• Vincent Courtillot, geophysicist, member of the French Academy of Sciences.^[91]
• Doug Edmeades, soil scientist, officer of the New Zealand Order of Merit.^[92]
• David Douglass, solid-state physicist, professor, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester.^[93][94]
• Don Easterbrook, emeritus professor of geology, Western Washington University.^[95][96]
• William Happer, physicist specializing in optics and spectroscopy; emeritus professor, Princeton University.^[39][97]
• Victor Manuel Velasco Herrera, Theoretical Physicist and Researcher, Institute of Geophysics of the National Autonomous University of Mexico.^[98]
• Ole Humlum, professor of geology at the University of Oslo.^[99][100]
• Wibjörn Karlén, professor emeritus of geography and geology at the University of Stockholm.^[101][102]
• William Kininmonth, meteorologist, former Australian delegate to World Meteorological Organization Commission for Climatology.^[103][104]
• David Legates, associate professor of geography and director of the Center for Climatic Research, University of Delaware.^[105][106]
• Anthony Lupo, professor of atmospheric science at the University of Missouri.^[107][108]
• Jennifer Marohasy, an Australian biologist, former director of the Australian Environment Foundation.^[109][110]
• Tad Murty, oceanographer; adjunct professor, Departments of Civil Engineering and Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa.^[111][112]
• Tim Patterson, paleoclimatologist and professor of geology at Carleton University in Canada.^[113][114]
• Ian Plimer, professor emeritus of mining geology, the University of Adelaide.^[115][116]
• Arthur B. Robinson, American politician, biochemist and former faculty member at the University of California, San Diego.^[117][118]
• Murry Salby, atmospheric scientist, former professor at Macquarie University and University of Colorado.^[119][120]
• Nicola Scafetta, research scientist in the physics department at Duke University.^{[121][122][123]}
• Tom Segalstad, geologist; associate professor at University of Oslo.^[124][125]
• Nir Shaviv, professor of physics focusing on astrophysics and climate science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.^[126][127]
• Fred Singer, professor emeritus of environmental sciences at the University of Virginia.^{[128][129][130][131]}
• Willie Soon, astrophysicist, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.^[132][133]
• Roy Spencer, meteorologist; principal research scientist, University of Alabama in Huntsville.^[134][135]
• Henrik Svensmark, physicist, Danish National Space Center.^[136][137]
• George H. Taylor, retired director of the Oregon Climate Service at Oregon State University.^[138][139]
• Jan Veizer, environmental geochemist, professor emeritus from University of Ottawa.^[140][141]

Scientists arguing that the cause of global warming is unknown

These scientists have said that no principal cause can be ascribed to the observed rising temperatures, whether man-made or natural.

• Syun-Ichi Akasofu, retired professor of geophysics and founding director of the International Arctic Research Center of the University of Alaska Fairbanks.^[142][143]
• Claude Allègre, French politician; geochemist, emeritus professor at Institute of Geophysics (Paris).^[144][145]
• Robert Balling, a professor of geography at Arizona State University.^[146][147]
• Pål Brekke, solar astrophysicist, senior advisor Norwegian Space Centre.^[148][149]
• John Christy, professor of atmospheric science and director of the Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, contributor to several IPCC reports.^{[150][151][152]}
• Petr Chylek, space and remote sensing sciences researcher, Los Alamos National Laboratory.^[153][154]
• David Deming, geology professor at the University of Oklahoma.^[155][156]
• Stanley B. Goldenberg a meteorologist with NOAA/AOML's Hurricane Research Division.^[157][158]
• Keith E. Idso, botanist, former adjunct professor of biology at Maricopa County Community College District and the vice president of the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change.^[159][160]
• Kary Mullis, 1993 Nobel laureate in chemistry, inventor of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method.^{[161][162][163]}
• Antonino Zichichi, emeritus professor of nuclear physics at the University of Bologna and president of the World Federation of Scientists.^[164][165]

Scientists arguing that global warming will have few negative consequences

These scientists have said that projected rising temperatures will be of little impact or a net positive for society or the environment.

• Indur M. Goklany, electrical engineer, science and technology policy analyst for the United States Department of the Interior.^{[166][167][168]}
• Craig D. Idso, geographer, faculty researcher, Office of Climatology, Arizona State University and founder of the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change.^[169][170]
• Sherwood B. Idso, former research physicist, USDA Water Conservation Laboratory, and adjunct professor, Arizona State University.^[171][172]
• Patrick Michaels, senior fellow at the Cato Institute and retired research professor of environmental science at the University of Virginia.^[173][174]

Deceased scientists

These scientists published material indicating their opposition to the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming prior to their deaths.

• August H. "Augie" Auer Jr. (1940–2007), retired New Zealand MetService meteorologist and past professor of atmospheric science at the University of Wyoming.^[175][176]
• Reid Bryson (1920–2008), emeritus professor of atmospheric and oceanic sciences, University of Wisconsin–Madison.^[177][178]
• Robert M. Carter (1942–2016), former head of the School of Earth Sciences at James Cook University.^[179][180]
• Chris de Freitas (1948–2017), associate professor, School of Geography, Geology and Environmental Science, University of Auckland.^[181][182]
• Vincent R. Gray (1922–2018), New Zealand physical chemist with expertise in coal ashes.^[183][184]
• William M. Gray (1929–2016), professor emeritus and head of the Tropical Meteorology Project, Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University.^[185][186]
• Yuri Izrael (1930–2014), former chairman, Committee for Hydrometeorology (USSR); former director, Institute of Global Climate and Ecology (Russian Academy of Science); vice-chairman of IPCC, 2001–2007.^{[187][188][189]}
• Robert Jastrow (1925–2008), American astronomer, physicist, cosmologist and leading NASA scientist who, together with Fred Seitz and William Nierenberg, established the George C. Marshall Institute.^{[190][191][192]}
• Harold ("Hal") Warren Lewis (1923–2011), emeritus professor of physics and former department chairman at the University of California, Santa Barbara.^[193][194]
• Frederick Seitz (1911–2008), solid-state physicist, former president of the National Academy of Sciences and co-founder of the George C. Marshall Institute in 1984.^{[195][196][197]}

They have no clue what caused severe climate in the past, the 97% are experts on what is causing it going forward.

Where's my grant cheque?

[Rod]

3 hours ago, revkevsdi said:

Your buddy Irv just kicked himself in the cunt. 

Nice work climate change deniers. 

Do you still believe that nations will be wiped off the face of the earth because of climate change by the year 2000?

[Rod]

39 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

They have no clue what caused severe climate in the past, the 97% are experts on what is causing it going forward.

Where's my grant cheque?

Kevvyboomboom would be best advised to close the north99 tab for a fuckin week or so

[snopro31]

Climate change will cause more flooding in Queerbec. 

Trudeau is going to save Queerbec by increasing transfer payments!!!

[irv]

1 minute ago, snopro31 said:

Climate change will cause more flooding in Queerbec. 

Trudeau is going to save Queerbec by increasing transfer payments!!!

I wonder if Kev is going to start paying more? I would assume, since we can buy our way out of Climate Change, the more money they get sooner, the better off we will be. 

50 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

They have no clue what caused severe climate in the past, the 97% are experts on what is causing it going forward.

Where's my grant cheque?

I think they want to ignore the science of what happened in the past so that is why they want the Medieval warming period removed from the history books.

Every bit of their fear mongering is based on computer data models and moving data points to fit their narrative all the while silencing decade upon decade of previous scientists work. 

Huge scam that naive, ignorant people buy into as they feel like they are doing their part to save the planet. 

[snopro31]

17 minutes ago, irv said:

I wonder if Kev is going to start paying more? I would assume, since we can buy our way out of Climate Change, the more money they get sooner, the better off we will be. 

I think they want to ignore the science of what happened in the past so that is why they want the Medieval warming period removed from the history books.

Every bit of their fear mongering is based on computer data models and moving data points to fit their narrative all the while silencing decade upon decade of previous scientists work. 

Huge scam that naive, ignorant people buy into as they feel like they are doing their part to save the planet. 

Its amazing how the people that believe in climate change and that the carbon tax aren't giving extra money.  The only way to save the earth is to pay a tax.....but they arent paying more then the allotted Trudeau amount. 

This shocks me that they don't care about their beliefs.

[Roosting]

Climate Change Barbie Hands. What a fucking idiot