Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted October 19, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted October 19, 2017 (edited) Holder knew of the investigation into Russia bribery or it was buried by Mueller and Comey.. Tic Toc Tic Toc. Holder, Mueller, Comey & Rosenstein Eric Holder was the Attorney General when the FBI began uncovering the Russian corruption scheme in 2009. Since the FBI reports to him, he surely knew what the bureau had uncovered. What’s more, Holder was a member of the “Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States” which approved the uranium sale to the Russians in 2010. Since the vote was unanimous, it appears Holder knowingly and deliberately countenanced a deal that was based on illegal activities and which gave Moscow control of more than 20 percent of America’s uranium assets. It gets worse. Robert Mueller was the FBI Director during the time of the Russian uranium probe, and so was his successor James Comey who took over in 2013 as the FBI was still developing the case. Rod Rosenstein, then-U.S. Attorney, was supervising the case. There is no indication that any of these men ever told Congress of all the incriminating evidence they had discovered and the connection to Clinton. The entire matter was kept secret from the American public. It may be no coincidence that Mueller (now special counsel) and Rosenstein (now Deputy Attorney General) are the two top people currently investigating whether the Trump campaign conspired with the Russians to influence the 2016 presidential election. Mueller reports to Rosenstein, while Comey is a key witness in the case. It is not unreasonable to conclude that Mueller, Rosenstein and Comey may have covered up potential crimes involving Clinton and Russia, but are now determined to find some evidence that Trump “colluded” with Russia. If this is true, Mueller and Rosenstein should immediately recuse themselves from the case. How can Americans have confidence in the outcome of the Trump-Russia matter if the integrity and impartiality of the lead investigators has been compromised by their suspected cover-up of the Clinton-Russia case? And, if the evidence is as compelling as reported, a second special prosecutor should be appointed to determine whether Hillary Clinton and others should be indicted for crimes of corruption. http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/10/18/gregg-jarrett-clinton-cover-up-brought-to-by-same-guys-who-are-investigating-trump.html Edited October 19, 2017 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEFF Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 Oh you've got to be kidding me! No way our government is that inept! Or is it??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 Next step, try to get mueller off the trump case. Sooooo predictable and soooooo gullible Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted October 19, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted October 19, 2017 (edited) The Dump Team said they never talked with or had any interaction with Russia....why worry about it? Nothing to hid, eh.... Edited October 19, 2017 by SnowRider Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oleroule Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 you would think the the gallows would be busy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XC.Morrison Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 Ya know, this Rusher thing with Clinton and Russia, it's a made up story. It's an excuse by the Republicans for why Mueller shouldn't be investigating the Rusher thing with Trump and Russia. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 16 minutes ago, XC.Morrison said: Ya know, this Rusher thing with Clinton and Russia, it's a made up story. It's an excuse by the Republicans for why Mueller shouldn't be investigating the Rusher thing with Trump and Russia. Didn't the Russian Trump investigation start with that fake dossier where her was supposed to be peeing on hookers? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEFF Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 21 minutes ago, XC.Morrison said: Ya know, this Rusher thing with Clinton and Russia, it's a made up story. It's an excuse by the Republicans for why Mueller shouldn't be investigating the Rusher thing with Trump and Russia. So it didn't start in 2009? Maybe you should go tell them that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 1 hour ago, Snoslinger said: You must be getting nervous... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 1 hour ago, SnowRider said: The Dump Team said they never talked with or had any interaction with Russia....why worry about it? Nothing to hid, eh.... Good little liberal...you can run but you cant hide. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEFF Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 A top Senate Republican is calling for the Justice Department to lift an apparent “gag order” on an FBI informant who reportedly helped the U.S. uncover a corruption and bribery scheme by Russian nuclear officials but allegedly was “threatened” by the Obama administration to stay quiet. Senate Judiciary Committee Chuck Grassley is focusing on the informant amid scrutiny of the 2010 approval of a controversial uranium deal with a Russian company. He’s raising questions about potential “conflicts of interest” for Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration, and especially wants to know whether the committee that approved the deal was aware of the FBI probe involving a subsidiary of the same Russian firm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 14 minutes ago, JEFF said: A top Senate Republican is calling for the Justice Department to lift an apparent “gag order” on an FBI informant who reportedly helped the U.S. uncover a corruption and bribery scheme by Russian nuclear officials but allegedly was “threatened” by the Obama administration to stay quiet. Senate Judiciary Committee Chuck Grassley is focusing on the informant amid scrutiny of the 2010 approval of a controversial uranium deal with a Russian company. He’s raising questions about potential “conflicts of interest” for Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration, and especially wants to know whether the committee that approved the deal was aware of the FBI probe involving a subsidiary of the same Russian firm. thanks jeff, the other 10 posts weren't enough Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEFF Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 24 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: thanks jeff, the other 10 posts weren't enough You're welcome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtralettucetomatoe580 Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 This all seems very convenient and circumstantial... Smart tactic, but I don’t buy it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 Is there anyone that still thinks the clinton foundation wasn't just for laundering bribes? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 1 hour ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said: This all seems very convenient and circumstantial... Smart tactic, but I don’t buy it. exactly. the fbi was looking at transactions between various businesses (not gov) and arrested some key players. the fbi being involved is no big secret. but a rww somewhere found something, spun it, and sold it to the rw morons to run with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XC.Morrison Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 2 hours ago, Carlos Danger said: Didn't the Russian Trump investigation start with that fake dossier where her was supposed to be peeing on hookers? I believe it was more the two hookers peed on him or maybe just on each other. I believe the main goal was to soak the bed in urine because the Obamas had stayed in the Presidential suite of the Moscow Ritz previously and he considered this to be good way to disrespect the Obamas. Many parts of the dossier have been borne out as true. Putin has a tape of the whole pee pee incident and he's holding it over Trumps head for leverage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 4 minutes ago, Rod Johnson said: Is there anyone that still thinks the clinton foundation wasn't just for laundering bribes? the foundation you swore was going to dry up, but were scared to make the bet on it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: exactly. the fbi was looking at transactions between various businesses (not gov) and arrested some key players. the fbi being involved is no big secret. but a rww somewhere found something, spun it, and sold it to the rw morons to run with. That's :lol: gotta be it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: the foundation you swore was going to dry up, but were scared to make the bet on it? Well they also use it as a tax shelter and you wanted to bet it would fold entirely. I said donations would dry up significantly. Why you so mad bro Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 Just now, Snake said: That's gotta be it. along with all the other uranium one facts... doesn't it get old snakey? I think I would have been at least a little skeptical after the 20th time nothing became of a Clinton scandal. not you though, you dive into each one like pigs in shit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 1 minute ago, Rod Johnson said: Well they also use it as a tax shelter and you wanted to bet it would fold entirely. I said donations would dry up significantly. Why you so mad bro no, that is not what you said. who's mad? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 Sitting here lol'ing watching snot doing his ole laughing while crying and clutching on to collusion theories as tightly as he can Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted October 19, 2017 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted October 19, 2017 5 minutes ago, XC.Morrison said: I believe it was more the two hookers peed on him or maybe just on each other. I believe the main goal was to soak the bed in urine because the Obamas had stayed in the Presidential suite of the Moscow Ritz previously and he considered this to be good way to disrespect the Obamas. Many parts of the dossier have been borne out as true. Putin has a tape of the whole pee pee incident and he's holding it over Trumps head for leverage. Care to list those out for us? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.