No real surprise.

Until there is unbiased media there can be no real campaign finance reform.   

https://www.oann.com/newsroom/trump-calls-to-stop-funding-of-npr-after-editor-admits-bias-downplaying-of-hunter-laptop-and-russia-narrative-push/

Expert NPR senior business editor Uri Berliner wrote an eye-opening editorial that appeared in The Free Press, claiming that the election of Donald Trump in 2016 inspired NPR reporters to look for ways to “damage or topple” his administration. He also said that the narrative that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to win the White House “became the catnip that drove reporting” and that “we [NPR] hitched our wagon to Trump’s most visible antagonist, Representative Adam Schiff.”

“During a meeting, one of NPR’s best journalists said it was good we weren’t following the [Hunter] laptop story because it could help Trump,” he stated.

Edited April 11, 20241 yr by Highmark

It’s kind of ridiculous that they did this. After all, there has been zero evidence found on the laptop tying Joe Biden to any wrong doing. 

Edited April 11, 20241 yr by ActionfigureJoe

23 minutes ago, ActionfigureJoe said:

It’s kind of ridiculous that they did this. After all, there has been zero evidence found on the laptop tying Joe Biden to any wrong doing. 

 

2 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said:

 

Of course..... pretty much how 95% of the media operates... This was pretty much the deciding factor to the election and why I call it a rigged election..... It made all the difference.  Which wasn't much to swing the election.

 

The LAPTOP!

52 minutes ago, Mainecat said:

The LAPTOP!

Yup..... There is a reason why all the media and the trusted 51 Intel agents withheld the laptop as false.  

It was the deciding factor of the election And all it would have taken for a Trump victory.     Only a very small percentage would have had to change their votes to make the difference .    And many admitted they would have voted differently Had they known......

  .. This has really been a tiring day of presenting the facts....sheesh.   Time to call it a day I think.

  

 

14 minutes ago, ViperGTS/Z1 said:

Yup..... There is a reason why all the media and the trusted 51 Intel agents withheld the laptop as false.  

It was the deciding factor of the election And all it would have taken for a Trump victory.     Only a very small percentage would have had to change their votes to make the difference .    And many admitted they would have voted differently Had they known......

  .. This has really been a tiring day of presenting the facts....sheesh.   Time to call it a day I think.

  

 

Not one of the 3 letter agencies claimed the laptop was a hoax. You do know this? Correct? 

22 minutes ago, ActionfigureJoe said:

Not one of the 3 letter agencies claimed the laptop was a hoax. You do know this? Correct? 

They were all in on it ...... Every single one of them.  Never spoke up and verified it as real and may have even gotten social media sites to take down posts as misinformation.

 I don't trust any facet of our government anymore and never will.

    

 

The left promotes the left the right promotes the right.  That is normal politics and a normal election.  By your definition every election ever was always rigged.

19 hours ago, ActionfigureJoe said:

It’s kind of ridiculous that they did this. After all, there has been zero evidence found on the laptop tying Joe Biden to any wrong doing. 

It’s like the Trump dossier, big nothing burgers.

Neal

14 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said:

It’s like the Trump dossier, big nothing burgers.

Neal

We are electing and paying these people to investigate each other while the shills cheer from the sidelines. 

How did Yelina get off the bad oligarc list? I mean one day she is going to face economic sanctions and the next day she gives Hunter and company 3.5 million and the following weak she is off the list and having dinner with Joe Biden in Washington. Yea it is probably a nothing burger.

1 hour ago, Carlos Danger said:

How did Yelina get off the bad oligarc list? I mean one day she is going to face economic sanctions and the next day she gives Hunter and company 3.5 million and the following weak she is off the list and having dinner with Joe Biden in Washington. Yea it is probably a nothing burger.

So you support these constant investigations with no legislation being adopted. 

17 hours ago, ActionfigureJoe said:

So you support these constant investigations with no legislation being adopted. 

Do you support a two tier justice system?

2 hours ago, Carlos Danger said:

Do you support a two tier justice system?

I support the mother fuckers to do their job. George Washington was corrupt piece of shit who inspected which of his slaves had the best teeth for extraction to replace his own. There was no investigation over that. 

On 4/11/2024 at 8:07 PM, ActionfigureJoe said:

Not one of the 3 letter agencies claimed the laptop was a hoax. You do know this? Correct? 

Come on dude they or people tied to thme was saying "it looks like Russian disinformation" when the absolutely knew it wasn't.  One former CIA director admitted this was done to help Biden.   He was the one who wrote the letter they all signed.

Edited April 14, 20241 yr by Highmark

18 minutes ago, Highmark said:

Come on dude they or people tied to thme was saying "it looks like Russian disinformation" when the absolutely knew it wasn't.  One former CIA director admitted this was done to help Biden.   He was the one who wrote the letter they all signed.

Not one 3 letter agency claimed the laptop was Russian disinformation. Mainly because none saw it as having any importance. 

On 4/14/2024 at 10:50 AM, ActionfigureJoe said:

Not one 3 letter agency claimed the laptop was Russian disinformation. Mainly because none saw it as having any importance. 

Not really accurate and to claim it didn't have any impact on the election is absolutely laughable.

CIA approved the letter so they were complicit.   Likely any former Intell officer had to have theirs sign off as well.  

https://nypost.com/2023/05/09/cia-fast-tracked-letter-that-falsely-suggested-hunter-biden-laptop-was-russia-op/

The CIA conspired with former acting director Mike Morell and the Biden campaign to produce a letter falsely claiming that emails from Hunter Biden’s laptop were Russian disinformation — and solicited signatures from at least one former intelligence official, a staff report from the House Judiciary Committee is expected to reveal Wednesday.

Morell told the CIA’s Prepublication Classification Review Board (PCRB) that he needed the letter approved as an unusual “rush job” that day, October 19, 2020, in an effort to provide then-candidate Joe Biden ammunition in the final presidential debate to discredit The Post’s report on the Biden emails which had been published five days earlier.

That day, a CIA employee working for the PCRB solicited a signature for Morell’s letter from former CIA analyst David Cariens, according to a written statement by Cariens to the Subcommittees on the Weaponization of the Federal Government, and Intelligence.

Cariens explained that he had been speaking with the PCRB about the prepublication review of his own memoir and during that phone call the CIA employee “asked” him if he would sign the draft letter.

Edited April 16, 20241 yr by Highmark

Didn’t the laptop show that Joe was taking pay to play money? And it was confirmed?

So the Dems and deep state were desperate to bury the laptop story because it didn’t matter?

1 hour ago, Rod said:

Didn’t the laptop show that Joe was taking pay to play money? And it was confirmed?

Nope. And despite what weird stuff is dug up online, no three letter agency commented on the laptop. 

20 minutes ago, ActionfigureJoe said:

Nope. And despite what weird stuff is dug up online, no three letter agency commented on the laptop. 

You’re being a retard and splitting hairs 

1 hour ago, Rod said:

Didn’t the laptop show that Joe was taking pay to play money? And it was confirmed?

Do you actually believe that Joe was the first and last politician to take play to pay money? Not saying he did or didn't(who cares). You think Trump never did any of this or the previous 20+ presidents before them?  .  Why do you think they have never passed laws prohibiting campaign contributions and WHO made them?  Christ man wake up. They all have been doing this shit for years. ALL. every party.. How do think they get moneys for commercials/campaigns?  When they get in they have to reward the scum who payed to play. Pass or push agendas that were paid in full before election.  

1 minute ago, jonlafon1 said:

Do you actually believe that Joe was the first and last politician to take play to pay money? Not saying he did or didn't(who cares). You think Trump never did any of this or the previous 20+ presidents before them?  .  Why do you think they have never passed laws prohibiting campaign contributions and WHO made them?  Christ man wake up. They all have been doing this shit for years. ALL. every party.. How do think they get moneys for commercials/campaigns?  When they get in they have to reward the scum who payed to play. Pass or push agendas that were paid in full before election.  

No guarantee Joe did it and it was illegal but zero democrat voters here care. There’s a reason these people become billionaires on a 150k salary 

19 minutes ago, Rod said:

No guarantee Joe did it and it was illegal but zero democrat voters here care. There’s a reason these people become billionaires on a 150k salary 

I typically vote Dem. I don't agree with all the Dem policy and do agree with some conservative policy. But I do think that at some point Joe has taken favors/money. Just like most all the other presidents/politicians of years past.  THEY ALL do it.  It will not stop because they dont want to loose the cash cow 

Edited April 16, 20241 yr by jonlafon1