Snoslinger Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 Lawmakers ask whether looming debt left Jared Kusher vulnerable to Russian influence Congressional investigators are seeking to determine whether President Trump’s son-in-law was vulnerable to Russian influence during and after the campaign because of financial stress facing his family firm’s signature real estate holding – a Manhattan skyscraper purchased at the height of the real estate boom. And they are focused, officials told ABC News, on a December meeting Jared Kushner held with executives from a Russian bank. “It's very peculiar that of all the people he could be talking to in a transition period where you've got lots of balls in the air, that you end up talking to a Russian banker who is under sanction and who is related to Putin and has a KGB background,” said Rep. Jackie Speier, a California Democrat who sits on the House Intelligence Committee. “I think the question has to be asked, was this about you trying to get financing for your troubled real estate that you have in New York City?” The timing of Kushner’s December meeting with executives from VneshEconomBank, or VEB, at the suggestion of the Russian ambassador, has also raised concerns from government watchdog groups across the political spectrum. http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/lawmakers-looming-debt-leave-jared-kushner-vulnerable-russian/story?id=47780422 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted June 2, 2017 Author Share Posted June 2, 2017 meh, new US admin officials always meet secretly with crooked, russian bankers they owe money to, when the air around them reeks of collusion with the russians right highmark? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 Dude, you're gonna be better off with articles NOT quoting nit-job Reps from California. Not much better off...well, not better off at all. But this is all very interesting! Or, to quote this dip shit, "Peculiar" that he was talking to somebody. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 Just now, Snake said: .....Now a "person of interest" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oleroule Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 the inside of a liberal's mind Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted June 2, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 2, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, Snoslinger said: meh, new US admin officials always meet secretly with crooked, russian bankers they owe money to, when the air around them reeks of collusion with the russians right highmark? So he met in December AFTER the election. Our bet is on election collusion. You don't actually believe that this Russian wasn't under electronic surveillance do you? I'd bet the guy couldn't fart without the CIA, NSA or FBI being able to smell it. Post up some evidence that their was actual contact BEFORE the election. Got to love these "officials." How official is someone releasing investigation details. "And they are focused, officials told ABC News, on a December meeting Jared Kushner held with executives" If and that's a big IF the "Russians" messed with the DNC in hopes of getting in good with the Trump Admin without the Trump team knowing that is not collusion. I think that's the most you might get. Edited June 2, 2017 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 14 minutes ago, oleroule said: the inside of a liberal's mind Those are the dots Snot connected Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted June 2, 2017 Author Share Posted June 2, 2017 38 minutes ago, Highmark said: So he met in December AFTER the election. Our bet is on election collusion. You don't actually believe that this Russian wasn't under electronic surveillance do you? I'd bet the guy couldn't fart without the CIA, NSA or FBI being able to smell it. Post up some evidence that their was actual contact BEFORE the election. Got to love these "officials." How official is someone releasing investigation details. "And they are focused, officials told ABC News, on a December meeting Jared Kushner held with executives" If and that's a big IF the "Russians" messed with the DNC in hopes of getting in good with the Trump Admin without the Trump team knowing that is not collusion. I think that's the most you might get. yep, hence the term "new" admin officials from me. the term "transition team" in the OP, etc. it's no wonder you can't see anything wrong in all this. you don't comprehend a damn thing you see or read. this is a "by-product" of the collusion thingy, and not part of the bet. so relax. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 2 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: yep, hence the term "new" admin officials from me. the term "transition team" in the OP, etc. it's no wonder you can't see anything wrong in all this. you don't comprehend a damn thing you see or read. this is a "by-product" of the collusion thingy, and not part of the bet. so relax. So if no collusion, this is fake news, right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted June 2, 2017 Author Share Posted June 2, 2017 Just now, Snake said: So if no collusion, this is fake news, right? not necessarily..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted June 2, 2017 Author Share Posted June 2, 2017 (edited) do you see nothing wrong with this situation snakey? you always have a lot of comments, but not much relevance to the topic. Edited June 2, 2017 by Snoslinger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted June 2, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 2, 2017 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: yep, hence the term "new" admin officials from me. the term "transition team" in the OP, etc. it's no wonder you can't see anything wrong in all this. you don't comprehend a damn thing you see or read. this is a "by-product" of the collusion thingy, and not part of the bet. so relax. I have no problem finding out what the transition team was saying in certain cases after the election. I have no problem with investigating the Logan Act. Apparently it should be done with EVERY administration. Reality is we were likely monitoring every Russian tied to this and I stand by my theory anything the IC has would already been leaked. Oh and by the way you are the one who added "collusion" when calling me out in this thread. Edited June 2, 2017 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted June 2, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 2, 2017 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: not necessarily..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 2 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: not necessarily..... You said it was a byproduct. A byproduct is a secondary event resulting from a primary result. If no collusion, there can be no byproduct. Ergo...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted June 2, 2017 Author Share Posted June 2, 2017 4 minutes ago, Snake said: You said it was a byproduct. A byproduct is a secondary event resulting from a primary result. If no collusion, there can be no byproduct. Ergo...... it's a by-product of my, and other theories. is that better? now how about answering my question... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franks pond Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted June 2, 2017 Author Share Posted June 2, 2017 and here we go again. let's ignore the scenario, and deflect with irrelevant BS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted June 2, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 2, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: and here we go again. let's ignore the scenario, and deflect with irrelevant BS. In other words.......I have nothing and have been owned again.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted June 2, 2017 Author Share Posted June 2, 2017 1 minute ago, Highmark said: In other words.......I have nothing and have been owned again.. you're right highmark. all of these things are mere coincidence. former transition teams have done the same things. it's all normal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 4 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: and here we go again. let's ignore the scenario, and deflect with irrelevant BS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 6 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: it's a by-product of my, and other theories. is that better? now how about answering my question... I don't agree with the premise of your theory. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted June 2, 2017 Author Share Posted June 2, 2017 1 minute ago, Snake said: fuck dude, give me a minute. you just posted it AND I responded Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted June 2, 2017 Author Share Posted June 2, 2017 1 minute ago, Snake said: I don't agree with the premise of your theory. then what do you think is/was going on? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 I'm siren THIS one will go somewhere! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.