Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted February 29 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted February 29 (edited) The US is still by far the most dominant military in the world. Conventionally nobody even comes close. Its the level of commitment to win and the long term goals of the mission that varies the most. If we take the gloves off and I'm not talking nuclear we would destroy anyone in months in all out conventional warfare. The problem becomes occupation. In order to hold the victory you need to occupy that nation for decades and decades. Simply not acceptable anymore. Edited February 29 by Highmark 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 20 minutes ago, Highmark said: The US is still by far the most dominant military in the world. In theory. Countries like Vietnam may beg to differ. In fact when was the last time the US dominated in a military war. Afghanistan?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 Faggots jacking off over war. Shocker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted February 29 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted February 29 23 minutes ago, Highmark said: The US is still by far the most dominant military in the world. Conventionally nobody even comes close. Its the level of commitment to win and the long term goals of the mission that varies the most. If we take the gloves off and I'm not talking nuclear we would destroy anyone in months in all out conventional warfare. The problem becomes occupation. In order to hold the victory you need to occupy that nation for decades and decades. Simply not acceptable anymore. 2 minutes ago, HSR said: In theory. Countries like Vietnam may beg to differ. In fact when was the last time the US dominated in a military war. Afghanistan?? Again its the level of commitment and what the mission goal after surrender would be. If the US went at any war/conflict like we did in WW2 it wouldn't even be a contest. We didn't even commit in Vietnam like we did in WW2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 1 minute ago, Highmark said: Again its the level of commitment and what the mission goal after surrender would be. If the US went at any war/conflict like we did in WW2 it wouldn't even be a contest. We didn't even commit in Vietnam like we did in WW2. So like I said,,,in theory Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted February 29 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted February 29 1 minute ago, HSR said: So like I said,,,in theory Let's hope we never have to actually declare war again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 3 minutes ago, Highmark said: Let's hope we never have to actually declare war again. That's fucking hilarious!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 1 hour ago, Highmark said: Cut off a countries electricity for 6 months and half the population would be dead. China likely could survive an EMP attack better than the US. The effects of an EMP attack remains largely speculative theory. Dig into it a little and you’ll find that out. IMO it’s way over blown. China would likely fair worse due to their excessive dependence on the global network for goods and services. We have everything right here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member steve from amherst Posted February 29 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted February 29 2 hours ago, Highmark said: Again its the level of commitment and what the mission goal after surrender would be. If the US went at any war/conflict like we did in WW2 it wouldn't even be a contest. We didn't even commit in Vietnam like we did in WW2. People felt they had something to lose in WW2 , they didnt feel that in southeast asia . Everyone was involved in the war effort in ww2, People had to be threatened with prison for Vietnam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted February 29 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted February 29 (edited) 1 hour ago, steve from amherst said: People felt they had something to lose in WW2 , they didnt feel that in southeast asia . Everyone was involved in the war effort in ww2, People had to be threatened with prison for Vietnam Yep. All I'm saying if America and our military reacted again like we did in WW2 god help whomever we are going up against. It most likely would take a direct military attack on our homeland to get that response. Imagine the insurgency that the US people could put up. Probably around half million people with the capability and equipment to shoot out to 300+ yards accurately. Edited February 29 by Highmark 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member steve from amherst Posted February 29 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted February 29 4 hours ago, Highmark said: It most likely would take a direct military attack on our homeland to get that response. May be the only thing that would bring this country together again too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 Rusha can't beat murica, too advanced. Murica has been at war for the last 60 years and hasn't won anything. Fucking idiots. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 1 hour ago, Anler said: Murica has been at war for the last 60 years and hasn't won anything. Fucking idiots. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 1 hour ago, Anler said: Rusha can't beat murica, too advanced. Murica has been at war for the last 60 years and hasn't won anything. Fucking idiots. Won the Cold War. Decisively. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member EvilBird Posted March 1 Gold Member Share Posted March 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 11 hours ago, akvanden said: Won the Cold War. Decisively. Losing Ukraine, decisively. Listen to smart people and stop acting like you know stuff. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hayward Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 The U.S. and it's military can't even control it's southern border..... MURCA!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 25 minutes ago, Anler said: Losing Ukraine, decisively. Losing decisively in a war with not one US/NATO soldier on the ground or in the air? Fascinating, tell us more on the goals of arming Ukrainians to protect their country. 28 minutes ago, Anler said: Listen to smart people and stop acting like you know stuff. Since you have time to watch, please provide the highlights for discussion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 6 hours ago, akvanden said: Losing decisively in a war with not one US/NATO soldier on the ground or in the air? Fascinating, tell us more on the goals of arming Ukrainians to protect their country. Since you have time to watch, please provide the highlights for discussion. LOL If you think we dont have any soldiers in Ukraine you are dumber than I thought Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 12 minutes ago, Anler said: LOL If you think we dont have any soldiers in Ukraine you are dumber than I thought Technically no. CIA operatives for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 1 minute ago, ActionfigureJoe said: Technically no. CIA operatives for sure. wrong as usual Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 3 minutes ago, Anler said: wrong as usual CIA is ex military. All covert actions are CIA contractors. Gives the government deniability and zero exposure. Same reason Russia uses the Wagner Group. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 24 minutes ago, Anler said: LOL If you think we dont have any soldiers in Ukraine you are dumber than I thought We don't have any fighting on the front lines, or in the air. Feel free to prove me wrong. Also, was there something from the video you wanted to discuss? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 11 minutes ago, akvanden said: We don't have any fighting on the front lines, or in the air. Feel free to prove me wrong. Also, was there something from the video you wanted to discuss? Careful. He has TikTok sources. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 7 hours ago, ActionfigureJoe said: CIA is ex military. All covert actions are CIA contractors. Gives the government deniability and zero exposure. Same reason Russia uses the Wagner Group. CIA has been in Ukraine for decades. Europe is now discussing sending troops to Ukraine. Now why would that be necessary? lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.