Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

paybacks a bitch cuntface


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, snoughnut said:

Not supporting anything you dummy, just stating a fact. Putin had no business starting that war. 

Not arguing, but Ukraine and Russia will be fighting wars well into the next century if there is still a world by then.

Only thing that will change it is a new type of leader for Russia. Ukraine just holds too much of what Russia wants (needs) to just leave it alone, and their ideology says to go get it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
27 minutes ago, Snake said:

Not arguing, but Ukraine and Russia will be fighting wars well into the next century if there is still a world by then.

Only thing that will change it is a new type of leader for Russia. Ukraine just holds too much of what Russia wants (needs) to just leave it alone, and their ideology says to go get it.

That pretty much sums it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, snoughnut said:

Not supporting anything you dummy, just stating a fact. Putin had no business starting that war. 

You're dumb ...sbyl

 

1 hour ago, Snake said:

Not arguing, but Ukraine and Russia will be fighting wars well into the next century if there is still a world by then.

Only thing that will change it is a new type of leader for Russia. Ukraine just holds too much of what Russia wants (needs) to just leave it alone, and their ideology says to go get it.

Ukraine was shelling it's own people - that were in former Russian territory.

They were also running Fauxi biolabs there.

NATO broke it's promise also & was going to expand there. 

This war would have never happened under the Donald.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Snake said:

Rather than ask us, why not ask all the tin pot dictators in the world what made them mind their Ps and Qs while he was in office....

Peace through strength seems to be the opposite of the “mind our own fucking business” “democrats are war mongers” crew around here.

 

Is that it though? Trump is even more ‘pro war’ than Biden?


 

6 minutes ago, EvilBird said:

I don't know maybe the history of the region? 

Or maybe the History of how NATO and USA played a huge role? 

I’m well aware of the history to know there’s not only one view to be taken from it, aka whatever your view is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ford_428cj said:

Victoria Nuland admitted under testimony that the US had at least 20 biolabs there. Keep laughing tho like a fool. 

Where can I find that transcript?
 

 

1 hour ago, ford_428cj said:

Would have worked with Putin to ensure NATO wouldn't expand to Uke. 

Is this something he said? Because he bragged about arming Ukraine other than only sending non lethal aid that the Obama admin sent. Wasn't one of Putins reasons to go into Ukraine to demilitarize? Well then of course the Nazi issue. Maybe Trump could have helped him with the Nazis too. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Rod said:

I believe there’s actually video of her saying they had bio labs there and were very concerned that Putin could seize them

Correct, but seemingly missing that they're US labs.

 

In congressional testimony this week, Ms. Nuland, the under secretary of state for political affairs, was asked by Senator Marco Rubio, Republican of Florida, whether Ukraine has chemical or biological weapons.

“Ukraine has biological research facilities which, in fact, we are now quite concerned Russian troops, Russian forces, may be seeking to gain control of,” she responded. “So we are working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of Russian forces should they approach.”

If there were a biological or chemical weapon attack inside Ukraine, Mr. Rubio asked, would there be any doubt that Russia was behind it?

“There is no doubt in my mind, Senator, and it is classic Russian technique to blame the other guy what they’re planning to do themselves,” Ms. Nuland responded.

The State Department said Ms. Nuland was referring to Ukrainian diagnostic and biodefense laboratories during her testimony, which are different from biological weapons facilities. Rather, these biodefense laboratories counter biological threats throughout the country, the department said.

Mr. Rubio made the same clarification in another congressional hearing on Thursday, noting that “there’s a difference between a bioweapons facility and one that’s doing research.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ford_428cj said:

You're dumb ...sbyl

 

Ukraine was shelling it's own people - that were in former Russian territory.

They were also running Fauxi biolabs there.

NATO broke it's promise also & was going to expand there. 

This war would have never happened under the Donald.

I told you to go play in traffic, run along now child.

2B0A1196-E125-4C58-B904-4D3B2EC19C96.gif.affb8898c5c3b99a6f19b1db74e4744b.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, akvanden said:

Correct, but seemingly missing that they're US labs.

 

In congressional testimony this week, Ms. Nuland, the under secretary of state for political affairs, was asked by Senator Marco Rubio, Republican of Florida, whether Ukraine has chemical or biological weapons.

“Ukraine has biological research facilities which, in fact, we are now quite concerned Russian troops, Russian forces, may be seeking to gain control of,” she responded. “So we are working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of Russian forces should they approach.”

If there were a biological or chemical weapon attack inside Ukraine, Mr. Rubio asked, would there be any doubt that Russia was behind it?

“There is no doubt in my mind, Senator, and it is classic Russian technique to blame the other guy what they’re planning to do themselves,” Ms. Nuland responded.

The State Department said Ms. Nuland was referring to Ukrainian diagnostic and biodefense laboratories during her testimony, which are different from biological weapons facilities. Rather, these biodefense laboratories counter biological threats throughout the country, the department said.

Mr. Rubio made the same clarification in another congressional hearing on Thursday, noting that “there’s a difference between a bioweapons facility and one that’s doing research.”

Fuck you're dumb.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Snake said:

Wow.... that's some sweet capitulation bro!

You must be confusing things with Ford’s “admitted under testimony that the US had at least 20 biolabs” commentary, which we don’t. 

 

 No worries, happy new years ;)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...