Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Dems spending more money. This time on SNAP benefits.


Recommended Posts

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/watchdog-finds-biden-s-usda-improperly-increased-snap-by-billions/ar-AA15KJym

In 1975, the USDA set food stamp benefit levels at the cost of the Thrifty Food Plan and adjusted those benefit levels each year for inflation. Three times since 1975, USDA researchers reevaluated the underlying assumptions of the Thrifty Food Plan, but always stayed within the bounds of the law—never raising the TFP above the inflation-adjusted amount of the 1975 plan.

This changed in 2021 when the Biden administration’s USDA ignored the historical precedent of reevaluating the Thrifty Food Plan by expanding it beyond the original plan’s cost constraints. The USDA defended their decision by arguing that the 2018 Farm Bill, which included a requirement to reevaluate the Thrifty Food Plan every five years, did not legally require the cost constraint principle, even though Republican lawmakers believed it did. The USDA conducted the reevaluation without the cost constraints, resulting in an unprecedented 21% increase in SNAP benefits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How big of a piece of fucking shit do you have to be to support Trump , the worst peace time spender in history…..and then cry about snap benefits. 
 

Racer you are the dumbest most disgusting piece of fucking shit on this planet. Dumb cocksucking asshole retard. Kill yourself 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, f7ben said:

How big of a piece of fucking shit do you have to be to support Trump , the worst peace time spender in history…..and then cry about snap benefits. 
 

Racer you are the dumbest most disgusting piece of fucking shit on this planet. Dumb cocksucking asshole retard. Kill yourself 

Go sell a sled without a toolkit to someone.

200 Billion here, 400 Billion for loan forgiveness.  You only cared when trump was involved.  Because you don't like him.

Edited by racer254
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, racer254 said:

Go sell a sled without a toolkit to someone.

200 Billion here, 400 Billion for loan forgiveness.  You only cared when trump was involved.  Because you don't like him.

Fuck you dumbass gutter trash retard. Die in a fucking fire 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An extra 20 billion per year to feed kids and this shameless piece of fucking dogshit cries about it. Literally the most disgusting filth on earth. I’d rather have a child rapist at my dinner table than racer 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

here in ny there is no excuse for hungry kids. none. they will give you what you need, but you have some responsibility to show up for meetings, fill out forms and whatever else they ask. plus mommy smokes 2 packs a day , drinking , lottery tickets. ebt card not used for that but these people get cash too and you can imagine what that goes to

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, f7ben said:

An extra 20 billion per year to feed kids and this shameless piece of fucking dogshit cries about it. Literally the most disgusting filth on earth. I’d rather have a child rapist at my dinner table than racer 

Don't forget the extra 36 billion to bail out the pensions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, sleepybrew said:

here in ny there is no excuse for hungry kids. none. they will give you what you need, but you have some responsibility to show up for meetings, fill out forms and whatever else they ask. plus mommy smokes 2 packs a day , drinking , lottery tickets. ebt card not used for that but these people get cash too and you can imagine what that goes to

We all realize this.  But "FEED THE HUNGRY CHILDREN" really touches the liberals and politicians have figured out laundering money in the name of kids makes it so it is hard to argue against it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, racer254 said:

We all realize this.  But "FEED THE HUNGRY CHILDREN" really touches the liberals and politicians have figured out laundering money in the name of kids makes it so it is hard to argue against it.

right. the money has always been there in ny. but i drive home, all the moms waiting for the bus in pjs, smoking . 2 packs a day, 10.00 each 140.00 a week. that will feed a kid. add in lottery tickets, booze, weed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, sleepybrew said:

right. the money has always been there in ny. but i drive home, all the moms waiting for the bus in pjs, smoking . 2 packs a day, 10.00 each 140.00 a week. that will feed a kid. add in lottery tickets, booze, weed

And where are the fathers?  There is so much money being given out, eventually we will pay for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
Just now, racer254 said:

And where are the fathers?  There is so much money being given out, eventually we will pay for it.

WGAF where the fathers are…it’s the not the kids fault if they are out of the picture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jimmy Snacks said:

WGAF where the fathers are…it’s the not the kids fault if they are out of the picture.

ny state cares about the dad. you apply for benefits, they ask what about dad. deadbeat dads in ny eventually get caught. they will come after you hard if you don't pay child support like you are required. the way it should be. why should we pay for someone else's kids?

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
8 minutes ago, sleepybrew said:

ny state cares about the dad. you apply for benefits, they ask what about dad. deadbeat dads in ny eventually get caught. they will come after you hard if you don't pay child support like you are required. the way it should be. why should we pay for someone else's kids?

I’m not sticking up for deadbeat dads but FFS should the kid suffer in the interim?  They lock up deadbeat dads here but how does that help the kid? 

Edited by Jimmy Snacks
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jimmy Snacks said:

I’m not sticking up for deadbeat dads but FFS should the kid suffer in the interim? 

my point is you keep giving money to mom, she blows it and has her hand out. i think none of us want kids hungry. even the schools give free breakfast and lunch to the needy. so that leaves one meal to conquer. think of the wife asking for more money for bills and such. just hand more over or question it?

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
50 minutes ago, racer254 said:

Go sell a sled without a toolkit to someone.

200 Billion here, 400 Billion for loan forgiveness.  You only cared when trump was involved.  Because you don't like him.

Raise the effective tax rate on corps - they are making record profits - robbing you blind - but like most dummies you’re focused on a shiny object.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member

@racer254 how much have we subsidized Wal-mart employees who qualify for SNAP over the past 50+ years as the Waltons became multi billionaires?   If hungry and cold kids piss you off while you admire American Oligarchs like the Waltons - you just might be a complete sack of shit :snack:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, SnowRider said:

Raise the effective tax rate on corps - they are making record profits - robbing you blind - but like most dummies you’re focused on a shiny object.  

Here kitty kitty kitty.  Back to that same old narrative.  ITS THE CORPORATIONS!!!!

87000 new IRS agents, are they going after corporations?  Fucking idiot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
Just now, racer254 said:

Here kitty kitty kitty.  Back to that same old narrative.  ITS THE CORPORATIONS!!!!

87000 new IRS agents, are they going after corporations?  Fucking idiot.

Pentagon “misplaces” 22 Trillion but here is shitbag racer worried about where the deadbeat dads are…FFS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
1 minute ago, racer254 said:

Here kitty kitty kitty.  Back to that same old narrative.  ITS THE CORPORATIONS!!!!

87000 new IRS agents, are they going after corporations?  Fucking idiot.

The agents are needed.  Too many oligarchs and corps not paying what is lawfully expected.  Another example how fucking clueless you are.  They do. Or care about you $9.99 you pay in taxes.  Trillions have been lost.  The agents are an investment not an expense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SnowRider said:

The agents are needed.  Too many oligarchs and corps not paying what is lawfully expected.  Another example how fucking clueless you are.  They do. Or care about you $9.99 you pay in taxes.  Trillions have been lost.  The agents are an investment not an expense. 

You really don't understand it do you?  The current crop of radicals in Washington are spending money like drunken sailors.  Wealthy elites and corporations can afford good tax accountants.  The middle and lower class does not have the $$$ to fight the IRS.  And here you are still hypnotized by that shiny penny that they wave in front of your face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...