Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Mandatory Easement


Recommended Posts

  • Platinum Contributing Member
42 minutes ago, Crnr2Crnr said:

and the government has done exactly what about it thus far?  how were the evil billionaires able to acquire all this property with no governmental oversight?  

I'm very much in favor of public lands dude, don't get me wrong here. ;)

 

How prevalent are cases in the OP?  My sense is it will become an issue as people demand kore access to their public lands and billionaires purchase large tracts.  At the end of the day - access to public land needs to be required.  Billionaire land owners can play nice or whine when the government requires access.  Otherwise - public lands without access encapsulated by private land is just and extension of the private land.  Is that fair?  
 

Nobody is demanding access to more private land in this example.  However - like I said before I do believe there is a debate to had in regards to private land access when it’s in a public program and/or the land owner is being subsidized.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, SnowRider said:

How prevalent are cases in the OP?  My sense is it will become an issue as people demand kore access to their public lands and billionaires purchase large tracts.  At the end of the day - access to public land needs to be required.  Billionaire land owners can play nice or whine when the government requires access.  Otherwise - public lands without access encapsulated by private land is just and extension of the private land.  Is that fair?  
 

Nobody is demanding access to more private land in this example.  However - like I said before I do believe there is a debate to had in regards to private land access when it’s in a public program and/or the land owner is being subsidized.     

the majority of it imo depends upon the land owner be they a corporation or private individual.  

here in Wisco there's quite a bit of private land that's available for limited public use, much owned by timber or utiliity companies... https://dnr.wisconsin.gov/topic/forestlandowners/opentopublicapp

https://dnrmaps.wi.gov/opfl/#

Edited by Crnr2Crnr
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
2 minutes ago, Crnr2Crnr said:

the majority of it imo depends upon the land owner be they a corporation or private individual.  

here in Wisco there's quite a bit of private land that's available for limited public use, much owned by timber or utiliity companies... https://dnr.wisconsin.gov/topic/forestlandowners/opentopublicapp

https://dnrmaps.wi.gov/opfl/#

I know.  I live in WI.  I grew up in NE where 97% of the land is privately owned.  
 

in NE fewer and fewer land owners still live on their property as more of it is bought up by absentee land owners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Crnr2Crnr said:

the majority of it imo depends upon the land owner be they a corporation or private individual.  

here in Wisco there's quite a bit of private land that's available for limited public use, much owned by timber or utiliity companies... https://dnr.wisconsin.gov/topic/forestlandowners/opentopublicapp

https://dnrmaps.wi.gov/opfl/#

Very cool map IMO. Thanks. :bc:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol



×
×
  • Create New...