Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Get vaxxed for grandma!


Snake

Recommended Posts

  • Gold Member
8 hours ago, akvanden said:

I didn't - please go back and read the conversation in it's entirety for context. Or don't, I really don't care. 

SO let's recap. You now know that covid vaccines don't entirely stop transmission - just as it was relayed to the entire world two years ago, same as the polio vaccine that you now know doesn't entirely stop transmission either. And you now know the differences between stable and unstable viruses and it's effect on efficacy. What a wonderful night of learning. :thumb:

Thats bullshit and you know it. Thats not at all what the media was saying even a year ago . 

Fauci the liar at 1:45

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, EvilBird said:

Thats bullshit and you know it. Thats not at all what the media was saying even a year ago . 

Fauci the liar at 1:45

 

1) please refer back to Dec 2020 FDA release where it says it doesn’t stop transmission, which predates all of these. 2) logically speaking, why would a vaccine that’s not 100% effective be 100% effective at stopping transmission? No vaccines completely stop transmission, why would this one be magically different?3) refer back to Dec 2020.

 

This whole idea that it’s either 100% or it’s 0% with nothing in the middle is very stupid. “It doesn’t completely stop transmission so therefore it doesn’t work = 0%!” This thread was built on that premises. 9_9

 

:smack:

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
2 minutes ago, akvanden said:

1) please refer back to Dec 2020 FDA release where it says it doesn’t stop transmission, which predates all of these. 2) logically speaking, why would a vaccine that’s not 100% effective be 100% effective at stopping transmission? No vaccines completely stop transmission, why would this one be magically different?3) refer back to Dec 2020.

 

This whole idea that it’s either 100% or it’s 0% with nothing in the middle is very stupid. “It doesn’t completely stop transmission so therefore it doesn’t work = 0%!” This thread was built on that premises. 9_9

 

:smack:

But but they changed the definition of vaccination.

:mc:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Gold Member
3 minutes ago, akvanden said:

1) please refer back to Dec 2020 FDA release where it says it doesn’t stop transmission, which predates all of these. 2) logically speaking, why would a vaccine that’s not 100% effective be 100% effective at stopping transmission? No vaccines completely stop transmission, why would this one be magically different?3) refer back to Dec 2020.

 

This whole idea that it’s either 100% or it’s 0% with nothing in the middle is very stupid. “It doesn’t completely stop transmission so therefore it doesn’t work = 0%!” This thread was built on that premises. 9_9

 

:smack:

So just ignore the fact that we have been lied to my Fauci and MSM? 

That is all my point is. You say YOU knew it doesn't 100% stop transmission but does the average American? And for what its worth I did see posts of you claiming it wasnt 100% so Ill give you props for that. 

My point is strictly the brain washing and lies the average person believes. Yet you seem only concerned with the other side. :dunno:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, akvanden said:

Would you like to know the differences between viruses that are stable with lower mutation rates like the measles, smallpox, and polio vs viruses that replicate fast and mutate often such as influenza and covid?

Would you like to know the efficacy of vaccines against stable vs unstable viruses?

He has no idea otherwise he wouldn't have stated natural immunity is infallible.

28 minutes ago, EvilBird said:

My point is strictly the brain washing and lies the average person believes. Yet you seem only concerned with the other side. :dunno:

Then you should blame the media.  While things were surely not presented straightforward by many, the media is what spun the web of confusion.  The details that were released were nowhere near as misleading as the nonsense that AC continues to propagate.  Both extremes are extremely ugly and suck donkey dick.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Gold Member
5 minutes ago, Deephaven said:

He has no idea otherwise he wouldn't have stated natural immunity is infallible.

Then you should blame the media.  While things were surely not presented straightforward by many, the media is what spun the web of confusion.  The details that were released were nowhere near as misleading as the nonsense that AC continues to propagate.  Both extremes are extremely ugly and suck donkey dick.

Trust me I am pissed with the media and blame them. Not much I can do about it other than not watch it. Wish other people stopped watching also. Although I am not sure ratings even matter anymore to them.  :sad:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, akvanden said:

1) please refer back to Dec 2020 FDA release where it says it doesn’t stop transmission, which predates all of these. 2) logically speaking, why would a vaccine that’s not 100% effective be 100% effective at stopping transmission? No vaccines completely stop transmission, why would this one be magically different?3) refer back to Dec 2020.

 

This whole idea that it’s either 100% or it’s 0% with nothing in the middle is very stupid. “It doesn’t completely stop transmission so therefore it doesn’t work = 0%!” This thread was built on that premises. 9_9

 

:smack:

The stopping of the virus transmission was the entire pretext for the vax passport.  All lies Bambi, all lies.  Globally they all lied.

The biggest fraud ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

The stopping of the virus transmission was the entire pretext for the vax passport.  All lies Bambi, all lies.  Globally they all lied.

The biggest fraud ever.

Vax passport pretext?  I've never seen a vax passport, the requirement to have one, nor am I even sure what it would be.  Yes I remember those wanting to have a label for those with the shot, but it wasn't ever realized here or where I have traveled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Deephaven said:

Vax passport pretext?  I've never seen a vax passport, the requirement to have one, nor am I even sure what it would be.  Yes I remember those wanting to have a label for those with the shot, but it wasn't ever realized here or where I have traveled.

Germany you needed one to hit the grocery store.

Another miss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Gold Member

Here in CT there were places that wanted proof of vaccination to enter. NY also. Comedy Club was one of em because I bought tickets and ended up not going because of it. 

All that shit has seemed to stop now tho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, EvilBird said:

So just ignore the fact that we have been lied to my Fauci and MSM? 

That is all my point is. You say YOU knew it doesn't 100% stop transmission but does the average American? And for what its worth I did see posts of you claiming it wasnt 100% so Ill give you props for that. 

My point is strictly the brain washing and lies the average person believes. Yet you seem only concerned with the other side. :dunno:

Sure, they could have been more clear and used language like ‘reduces’ vs stop. The word ‘reduces’ though is a concept missed by several on here.

 

20 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

The stopping of the virus transmission was the entire pretext for the vax passport.  All lies Bambi, all lies.  Globally they all lied.

The biggest fraud ever.

Ok Mr 0%.

7 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

How it started.

Fe1Wid3aMAA8aAR?format=jpg&name=medium

How it's going.

Fe1WieJaAAAnMWk?format=jpg&name=medium

 

You see the word reduction in there? That’s how it was and still is.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Deephaven said:

No you don't.  Have you been to a grocery store in Germany?  I was in Aldi in June.  

Germany was one of the worse.  All based on lies.  What does that tell you?

 

https://www.traveloffpath.com/travel-advisory-germany-locks-down-unvaccinated-people/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, akvanden said:

Sure, they could have been more clear and used language like ‘reduces’ vs stop. The word ‘reduces’ though is a concept missed by several on here.

 

Ok Mr 0%.

You see the word reduction in there? That’s how it was and still is.

Based on what test idiot?  

You've been had, at least try to have some self respect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Gold Member
10 minutes ago, akvanden said:

Sure, they could have been more clear and used language like ‘reduces’ vs stop. The word ‘reduces’ though is a concept missed by several on here.

 

Ok Mr 0%.

You see the word reduction in there? That’s how it was and still is.

Is there really a reduction though? 

No way to prove it, all we know is most people have now had covid and spread it vaxxed or not. 

I caught it from my sister who was Vaxxed then tested positive on actually my second go around. You may recall. 

I wish we really knew how much it has helped. 

Edited by EvilBird
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ArcticCrusher said:

Based on what test idiot?  

You've been had, at least try to have some self respect.

You just posted a tweet on a UK study yesterday, dummy.

Are you familiar with viral load? Are you familiar with the concept of someone who is more sick with a higher viral load shedding more of the virus than those less sick?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, EvilBird said:

No way to prove it, all we know is most people have now had covid and spread it vaxxed or not. 

But you can prove reduction. There are numerous studies, even one AC posted yesterday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Gold Member
Just now, akvanden said:

But you can prove reduction. There are numerous studies, even one AC posted yesterday.

tough to prove reduction when there is also herd immunity and mutations no? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, akvanden said:

You just posted a tweet on a UK study yesterday, dummy.

Are you familiar with viral load? Are you familiar with the concept of someone who is more sick with a higher viral load shedding more of the virus than those less sick?

I called that bullshit.  You moving the post again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...