ICEMAN! Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/politics/manafort-is-gone-but-his-business-associate-remains-a-key-part-of-trumps-operation/2017/03/22/6ecbaa96-0f0f-11e7-9b0d-d27c98455440_story.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 highmark will be along soon with more on the uranium one story. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: highmark will be along soon with more on the uranium one story. u don't like that 1? the 100% provable one with financial records to back it. the one u all said was no big deal . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 23 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: highmark will be along soon with more on the uranium one story. like the cash trail to the Clinton checkbook Frank Giustra $31.3 million and a pledge for $100 million more He built a company that later merged with Uranium One. Ian Telfer $2.35 million Mining investor who was chairman of Uranium One when an arm of the Russian government, Rosatom, acquired it. Paul Reynolds $1 million to $5 million Adviser on 2007 UrAsia-Uranium One merger. Later helped raise $260 million for the company. Frank Holmes $250,000 to $500,000 Chief Executive of U.S. Global Investors Inc., which held $4.7 million in Uranium One shares in the first quarter of 2011. Neil Woodyer $50,000 to $100,000 Adviser to Uranium One. Founded Endeavour Mining with Mr. Giustra. GMP Securities Ltd. Donating portion of profits Worked on debt issue that raised $260 million for Uranium One but let me tell u some one may or may not have talked with a Russian during a campaign and even had a conversation about exposing the fraud the DNC pulled on the us voter and the fraud that the Clinton foundation was involved in . even though Assange says no he did not get it from the Russians . in this long list cast of characters who is the only 1 who has not lied to u ? what character in this drama has no political agenda behind his story ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted March 23, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 23, 2017 (edited) 39 minutes ago, Ez ryder said: u don't like that 1? the 100% provable one with financial records to back it. the one u all said was no big deal . They don't like actual proof. They like stories with "suggests" and "appeared" in them. Then when you beat them down enough they come back with "well she isn't the President now is she" all the while regurgitating the same story over and over again. Edited March 23, 2017 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 1 hour ago, Ez ryder said: like the cash trail to the Clinton checkbook Frank Giustra $31.3 million and a pledge for $100 million more He built a company that later merged with Uranium One. Ian Telfer $2.35 million Mining investor who was chairman of Uranium One when an arm of the Russian government, Rosatom, acquired it. Paul Reynolds $1 million to $5 million Adviser on 2007 UrAsia-Uranium One merger. Later helped raise $260 million for the company. Frank Holmes $250,000 to $500,000 Chief Executive of U.S. Global Investors Inc., which held $4.7 million in Uranium One shares in the first quarter of 2011. Neil Woodyer $50,000 to $100,000 Adviser to Uranium One. Founded Endeavour Mining with Mr. Giustra. GMP Securities Ltd. Donating portion of profits Worked on debt issue that raised $260 million for Uranium One but let me tell u some one may or may not have talked with a Russian during a campaign and even had a conversation about exposing the fraud the DNC pulled on the us voter and the fraud that the Clinton foundation was involved in . even though Assange says no he did not get it from the Russians . in this long list cast of characters who is the only 1 who has not lied to u ? what character in this drama has no political agenda behind his story ? But Trump said pussy ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 *sigh* ...I'm sick of being late to the party. I wanna hand these liberals their own ass too! I feel lazy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 I find it extremely disappointing members from the right here are deflecting this major national security breach with our #1 enemy. I would be more concerned about this being our countries demise than a fuckin border wall. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 Rep. Louie Gohmert, an outspoken House Republican from Texas, is calling for a congressional investigation of John Podesta’s role with Rusnano, a state-run company founded by Russian President Vladimir Putin, The Daily Caller News Foundation’s Investigative Group has learned. Podesta — Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign chairman and former President Bill Clinton’s White House chief of staff — first made contact with the Russian firm in 2011, when he joined the boards and executive committees of three related entities: Boston-based Joule Unlimited; Rotterdam-based Joule Global Holdings; Joule Global Stichting, the company’s controlling interest. All are high-tech renewable energy enterprises. Three months after Podesta’s arrival, Joule Unlimited accepted a 1 billion ruble investment from Rusnano, amounting to $35 million in U.S. currency. The firm also awarded a Joule board seat in February 2012 to Anatoly Chubais, Rusnano’s CEO, who has been depicted as a corrupt figure. One potential legal problem for him relates to the time he joined former President Barack Obama’s White House staff in 2014 as a senior counselor and failed to reveal his 2011 Joule stock vesting agreement in his government financial disclosure form. Further, he failed to disclose 75,000 common shares of Joule stock he received, as disclosed in a WikiLeaks email. After Podesta began working at the White House, his lawyer indicated in a Jan. 6, 2014 email that he had not yet finished the legal work on the private transfer of the stock to a family-owned entity called Leonido Holdings, LLC. Gohmert’s call for an examination of Podesta’s Russian ties comes as Washington is in the grips of a set of allegations about Russian ties to President Donald Trump and his aides, as well as charges of Russian influence during the presidential election. Gohmert is troubled about the Podesta-Russia connection, telling TheDCNF, “this certainly needs to be reviewed to see if there really is something nefarious going on with these activities.” Gohmert sits on the House Judiciary Committee and is vice chair of its subcommittee on crime, terrorism and homeland security. Campaign chairman John Podesta watches from the edge of the stage during a campaign rally with Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton (not pictured) at Heinz Field in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, November 4, 2016. REUTERS/Brian Snyder The Podesta-Russia connection also could rekindle a new round of questions about Clinton relationships with foreign figures — in this case, Chubais. Chubais, Russia’s deputy prime minister in the 1990s, owed his personal fortunes to Bill Clinton, who embraced him as a “reformer” in former President Boris Yeltsin’s government. Clinton’s ally instead created a new generation of tycoons who today rule Russia. Podesta’s role at Joule was largely unknown until last year when the nonprofit Government Accountability Institute (GAI) published a highly-detailed report on Russian ties to Podesta and the Clintons. An ongoing federal lawsuit, Neas Ltd, v. Rusnano, which is now before the U.S. District Court for Northern California, suggests Podesta and others at Joule may have unwittingly assisted Rusnano in a scheme hatched to move billions of weak rubles into valuable U.S. dollars by parking them as “investments” in high-tech companies in Boston and in Silicon Valley. A deposition by Ilya Ponomarev, an architect of Russia’s innovation enterprises and the former chairman of innovations subcommittee in the Russian Parliament, shed light on Rusnano’s plans in the United States. He says its primary objective “was the transformation of Rusnano from a state-owned corporation to an enterprise suitable for operations in the United States.” Ponomarev now lives in exile in the United States. Shortly after then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton pursued her “reset” with Russia, state-owned Russian companies began targeting American companies in Boston and Silicon Valley as investment opportunities. In May 2010, under Hillary Clinton’s leadership, the Department of State facilitated a visit by 22 American hi-tech and venture capital firms to Skolkovo, Russia’s version of Silicon Valley, according to GAI. Rusnano appears to have been a leader in the Russian investment move into the United States. Chubais created a Rusnano “investment fund” and set up a so-called “Russian Innovation Center” in tony Silicon Valley, according to the Neas lawsuit. The company opened shop in Palo Alto called DJF Venture Fund, a venture capital fund advised the Russian company. Rusnano targeted Boston where Joule’s U.S. operations were centered. In 2010, Chubais joined a Rusnano “road show” and gave a presentation at MIT. A Rusnano managing director also addressed the Harvard Faculty Club. An Oct. 5, 2011 Rusnano PowerPoint presentation by Dmitry Akhanov, Rusnano USA president, promised American businessmen “cheap money.” Rusnano dangled $4.6 billion in government contributions and $5.7 billion in state guarantees. Lucia Ziobro, the special agent in charge at the FBI’s Boston field office, issued an “extraordinary warning” to Boston-area high-tech firms in 2014 about Russian investors to startups like Joule. “The FBI believes the true motives of the Russian partners, who are often funded by their government, is to gain access to classified, sensitive and emerging technology from the companies,” she wrote in a Boston Globe op-ed. Podesta’s emails also show how in 2015 Podesta continued to help Rusnano even though he had left Joule’s boards. Podesta’s lawyer told him he did legal work for the Rosnano president to get on the Joule board. Rusnano was a special company formed by decree at the direction of Putin. A small group of Putin cronies called the “Kooperative Ozero” masterminded the takeover of big swaths of the Russian economy. The Ozero group are eight men — including Putin — who owned expensive dachas on a lake outside of St. Petersburg. They now run state-owned banks, the news media and oil and gas companies. Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2017/03/21/exclusive-podesta-was-board-member-of-firm-linked-to-russian-investors/#ixzz4cA9ucSsK 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 41 minutes ago, Mainecat said: I find it extremely disappointing members from the right here are deflecting this major national security breach with our #1 enemy. I would be more concerned about this being our countries demise than a fuckin border wall. "Major national security breach with out #1 enemy". Oh boy. Do you want to explain any of that a bit? Or did you mean to say, "I find it extremely disappointing members from the right here do not think exactly like I do," Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 (edited) 54 minutes ago, Mainecat said: I find it extremely disappointing members from the right here are deflecting this major national security breach with our #1 enemy. I would be more concerned about this being our countries demise than a fuckin border wall. u fuckifucking hack our #1 enemy ? what fucking bubble are u living in? if they are truly such a enemy why deond the cash did Clinton work so hard to get the uranium deal done? fucking back pathetic get back to the huffpoo and then let us know your thoughts Edited March 23, 2017 by Ez ryder Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 Do we have ant military bases in Russia? Our worldwide bases are set up to protect us from Russia. for the 50th time Russia is not our friend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted March 23, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 23, 2017 (edited) 5 hours ago, Mainecat said: I find it extremely disappointing members from the right here are deflecting this major national security breach with our #1 enemy. I would be more concerned about this being our countries demise than a fuckin border wall. Like your opinion of any of us matters. Take it easy dad. Oh did you post up any proof of collusion yet.......didn't think so. Edited March 23, 2017 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franks pond Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.