AssCrusher.....

[Deephaven]

11 hours ago, akvanden said:

Guess we'll cross that bridge when we get there, but I doubt we'll ever get there.

Nah, he will look like an idiot but that is true regardless of what happens.

[DriftBusta]

18 hours ago, Badger** said:

You would think you'd want to look into it instead of stuffing it under the rug, Humm I wounder what would happen if the tables were turned. You cannot deny there was a lot of weird stuff going on with this past election. 

The clapping seals are looking the other way.  Plenty of people have laid out examples of irregularities, and far too much of the population thinks the election was sketchy.  You’d think the powers that be would take pains to prove otherwise or respond to the specific allegations.  No, just pretend those people are wackos and laugh.

 

[spin_dry]

14 minutes ago, DriftBusta said:

The clapping seals are looking the other way.  Plenty of people have laid out examples of irregularities, and far too much of the population thinks the election was sketchy.  You’d think the powers that be would take pains to prove otherwise or respond to the specific allegations.  No, just pretend those people are wackos and laugh.

 

There hadn’t been anything of the sort happening. You’re just sore because your guy lost. 

[racer254]

As the Thomas More Society and the Wisconsin Voter Alliance are digging deeper, they are finding more data to support the claims of the alleged violations committed by the state’s election officials. Recent information obtained from Wisconsin’s County Registers in Probate reveal a massive underreporting of wards under “no vote” guardianship orders by WisVote, the state’s voter database. The investigation has uncovered the likelihood that more than 95 percent of Wisconsin individuals under court-ordered “no vote” guardianships are not recorded as such, and therefore may have illegally voted – or had votes cast in their names.

[akvanden]

41 minutes ago, DriftBusta said:

and far too much of the population thinks the election was sketchy

It's scary that the population (both left and right) can be so easily misled by poor lying leadership. You'd think all the audits each of the states independanty ran (over 250 in Michigan), audits in Gerogia, Arizona, the cyber ninja circus, 2,000 mules that led to nothing, all the 50+ court filings Trump and Co pushed through and every single one was thrown out in court, Republican governers, Rebuplican AGs, Republican election officials, etc, etc, etc all certifying the results. Audits on dead people voting, audits on ballot harvesting, audits on counts, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc.......................all certifying the results. 

Yet somehow people beleive that the democrats must be the sneakiest most clever mother fuckers ever. They'd have to be in order for someone to still think they pulled off mass fraud that no one is able to articulate and prove. 





And the reason we're still having this discussion is the #1 reason why we need leadership who's more that just "good policies."

[Jimmy Snacks]

[racer254]

11 minutes ago, akvanden said:

It's scary that the population (both left and right) can be so easily misled by poor lying leadership. You'd think all the audits each of the states independanty ran (over 250 in Michigan), audits in Gerogia, Arizona, the cyber ninja circus, 2,000 mules that led to nothing, all the 50+ court filings Trump and Co pushed through and every single one was thrown out in court, Republican governers, Rebuplican AGs, Republican election officials, etc, etc, etc all certifying the results. Audits on dead people voting, audits on ballot harvesting, audits on counts, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc.......................all certifying the results. 

Yet somehow people beleive that the democrats must be the sneakiest most clever mother fuckers ever. They'd have to be in order for someone to still think they pulled off mass fraud that no one is able to articulate and prove. 





And the reason we're still having this discussion is the #1 reason why we need leadership who's more that just "good policies."

Paul Pelosi can crash his car while drunk, get judges changed, get away with DUI, yet people like you can't understand how elections can be rigged?

Edited August 7, 2022 by racer254

[akvanden]

2 minutes ago, racer254 said:

And yet paul pelosi can get judges changed, get away with DUI, yet people like you can't understand how elections can be rigged?

Articulate and prove, otherwise it gets old real quick.

[racer254]

1 minute ago, akvanden said:

Articulate and prove, otherwise it gets old real quick.

Already been done multiple times.  2000 mules, absentee ballots, ballot boxes, “no vote” guardianships.  Paul Pelosi can get judges changed, he is just one guy, what do you think can happen with a party of lawyers?

[akvanden]

2 minutes ago, racer254 said:

Already been done multiple times.  2000 mules, absentee ballots, ballot boxes, “no vote” guardianships.  Paul Pelosi can get judges changed, he is just one guy, what do you think can happen with a party of lawyers?

Wrong, mass fraud has not been proved, and especially by 2,000 mules (you know states followed up with individuals they had on video and found nothing).

And you're right, he's just one guy. What you're implying is a coordinated, highly complex, nationwide scheme that would require efforts by both parties officals (both local, state, and federal), courts, judges, that, once again, you can't even begin to articulate, let alone prove.

[DriftBusta]

1 hour ago, spin_dry said:

There hadn’t been anything of the sort happening. You’re just sore because your guy lost. 

Keep thinking that, the country will continue to be divided.

32 minutes ago, racer254 said:

Paul Pelosi can crash his car while drunk, get judges changed, get away with DUI, yet people like you can't understand how elections can be rigged?

If Trump after Obama has proven one thing, its just how corrupt our government is.

11 minutes ago, akvanden said:

Wrong, mass fraud has not been proved, and especially by 2,000 mules (you know states followed up with individuals they had on video and found nothing).

And you're right, he's just one guy. What you're implying is a coordinated, highly complex, nationwide scheme that would require efforts by both parties officals (both local, state, and federal), courts, judges, that, once again, you can't even begin to articulate, let alone prove.

Like Has been said, and will continue to be said, no refutations of specific allegations, just ignore them.  I’ve yet to read any judges response that lays out why the allegations are false, just some general mealy mouth bullshit of “no proof”.  Example.  That chick up there claiming 120% voter participation rate which would be clear fraud.  Prove her wrong.  We dont ever seem to get that.  Both sides suffer from cognitive biases I get that.  But I want proof that the multiple allegations are false, not this horse shit of waving the allegations off while chuckling at the people who knew how ridiculous of a choice Biden was.  The guy is a walking corpse, 81 million votes?   Sure ok.

[Rod]

The alt left believes US elections are so secure they can be stolen if don jr talked to a Russian person once 

[akvanden]

24 minutes ago, DriftBusta said:

Like Has been said, and will continue to be said, no refutations of specific allegations, just ignore them.

What are you talking about? What do you think all these audits have been for? Have you followed any of them? What do you think all the lawsuits were for? Lip service?

 

25 minutes ago, DriftBusta said:

That chick up there claiming 120% voter participation rate which would be clear fraud.  Prove her wrong.  We dont ever seem to get that.

Really? Nearly two years later and we're still wondering about the most basic of basics? 

"Luce County in the Upper Peninsula, which went mostly red, saw the highest turnout percentage in the state at 82.9%, meaning 3,795 votes were cast out of 4,579 registered voters. The lowest was Dickinson County at 56.7%, which is lower than its turnout rate in 2016 which was 60%."

[Jimmy Snacks]

2 minutes ago, akvanden said:

What are you talking about? What do you think all these audits have been for? Have you followed any of them? What do you think all the lawsuits were for? Lip service?

 

Really? Nearly two years later and we're still wondering about the most basic of basics? 

"Luce County in the Upper Peninsula, which went mostly red, saw the highest turnout percentage in the state at 82.9%, meaning 3,795 votes were cast out of 4,579 registered voters. The lowest was Dickinson County at 56.7%, which is lower than its turnout rate in 2016 which was 60%."

You really are wasting your breath sorry to say….Mr. Honest discussion is interested in anything but that.

[spin_dry]

Sore losers. Just like their king. 

[racer254]

3 hours ago, akvanden said:

Wrong, mass fraud has not been proved, and especially by 2,000 mules (you know states followed up with individuals they had on video and found nothing).

And you're right, he's just one guy. What you're implying is a coordinated, highly complex, nationwide scheme that would require efforts by both parties officals (both local, state, and federal), courts, judges, that, once again, you can't even begin to articulate, let alone prove.

Name one individual that was followup up with?  Just one.

NO, you won't, because all you want to do is ignore the obvious.

These people rely on the ignorance of the general public to get away with these types of crimes.  As you and others really have no idea what laws were broken, if any, and what can be done if election fraud was actually found.

Do you know what the process is, if they proved that 2000 mules, or this amount of election fraud was true?

Edited August 7, 2022 by racer254

[akvanden]

29 minutes ago, racer254 said:

Name one individual that was followup up with?  Just one.

NO, you won't, because all you want to do is ignore the obvious.

 

Oh YES, I will.

Georgia investigation dispels allegations highlighted in ‘2000 Mules’

Ballots were legally delivered for family members

Surveillance video showed a man pull up in a white SUV and insert five absentee ballots into a Gwinnett County drop box, leading to allegations of “ballot harvesting” promoted by the movie “2000 Mules.”

An investigation revealed he was delivering ballots for his family, which is allowed under Georgia law.

The State Election Board voted unanimously Tuesday to dismiss that case and two similar claims that voters had illegally returned absentee ballots. An investigator told the board that in each case, he tracked license plate numbers, interviewed voters and confirmed that ballots belonged to family members in the same household.

https://www.ajc.com/politics/georgia-investigation-dispels-allegations-highlighted-in-2000-mules/DREWO27XXBF7PB4DGTBXWGQYV4/


 

 

 

You live in a fantasy world ruled by your imagination.

[Jimmy Snacks]

34 minutes ago, racer254 said:

Name one individual that was followup up with?  Just one.

NO, you won't, because all you want to do is ignore the obvious.

These people rely on the ignorance of the general public to get away with these types of crimes.  As you and others really have no idea what laws were broken, if any, and what can be done if election fraud was actually found.

Do you know what the process is, if they proved that 2000 mules, or this amount of election fraud was true?

Trump relies on the ignorance of people like you…obviously his faith is well placed.😂

Edited August 7, 2022 by Jimmy Snacks

[racer254]

https://thomasmoresociety.org/

[racer254]

Ballot harvesting is legal in many states, including Georgia.  Casting a vote for court-ordered “no vote” guardianships is not

I posted many times here before the election how I was given multiple mailers for absentee ballots.

 

[racer254]

2 hours ago, akvanden said:

Oh YES, I will.

Georgia investigation dispels allegations highlighted in ‘2000 Mules’

Ballots were legally delivered for family members

Surveillance video showed a man pull up in a white SUV and insert five absentee ballots into a Gwinnett County drop box, leading to allegations of “ballot harvesting” promoted by the movie “2000 Mules.”

An investigation revealed he was delivering ballots for his family, which is allowed under Georgia law.

The State Election Board voted unanimously Tuesday to dismiss that case and two similar claims that voters had illegally returned absentee ballots. An investigator told the board that in each case, he tracked license plate numbers, interviewed voters and confirmed that ballots belonged to family members in the same household.

https://www.ajc.com/politics/georgia-investigation-dispels-allegations-highlighted-in-2000-mules/DREWO27XXBF7PB4DGTBXWGQYV4/


 

 

 

You live in a fantasy world ruled by your imagination.

Funny that it is a site that I have to subscribe to read.

 

[akvanden]

8 minutes ago, racer254 said:

Funny that it is a site that I have to subscribe to read.

 

It’s more of an annoyance than funny. And back to my original point, they have been investigating claims from the movie.

 

[racer254]

1 minute ago, akvanden said:

It’s more of an annoyance than funny. And back to my original point, they have been investigating claims from the movie.

 

They should be investigating any claims of voter irregularities.  What will they do if they find them?  And what do you have to say about the "no vote" guardianships?

[DriftBusta]

4 hours ago, spin_dry said:

Sore losers. Just like their king. 

Well at least we voted for the only logical choice.  And you somehow think it’s just fine that the the D party is running the country into the ground.  That is some special kind of stupid.

[akvanden]

9 minutes ago, racer254 said:

They should be investigating any claims of voter irregularities.  What will they do if they find them?  And what do you have to say about the "no vote" guardianships?

They have been, there’s constantly stories coming out at the county/state level across the country that the audits are not finding any systemic irregularities. If and when they do find them, assuming you’re talking about nefarious activity, they’re prosecuted.

as for the no vote thing, sounds like they’re looking into it in WI? Guess we’ll find out when they’re done.