Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted June 9, 2022 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 9, 2022 (edited) https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/3516381-supreme-court-shields-border-patrol-agents-from-excessive-force-suits/amp/ The conservative majority, citing national security concerns, declined to extend a judge-made rule that allows plaintiffs to sue federal officers for certain constitutional violations. That relief, based on a precedent set by Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, is generally disfavored by judicial conservatives. “Because matters intimately related to foreign policy and national security are rarely proper subjects for judicial intervention,” Thomas wrote, “we reaffirm that a Bivens cause of action may not lie where, as here, national security is at issue.” Interesting…any thoughts from the panel?🤷🏻 Edited June 9, 2022 by Jimmy Snacks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member EvilBird Posted June 9, 2022 Gold Member Share Posted June 9, 2022 (edited) tRuMp iS rAcIst . hE wAntS tO kIlL aLL iMmIgRaNtS! Oh yeah whoops Joe Biden is now President. Edited June 9, 2022 by EvilBird Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted June 9, 2022 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 9, 2022 (edited) 2 minutes ago, EvilBird said: tRuMp iS rAcIst . hE wAntS tO kIlL aLL iMmIgRaNtS! Oh yeah whoops Joe Biden is President. That’s what you got out of the decision by The Supreme Court? Edited June 9, 2022 by Jimmy Snacks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member EvilBird Posted June 9, 2022 Gold Member Share Posted June 9, 2022 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Jimmy Snacks said: That’s what you got out of the decision by The Supreme Court? Ask Liberals why they linked Supreme Court decisions to Trump? Edited June 9, 2022 by EvilBird Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted June 9, 2022 Share Posted June 9, 2022 Seems that with more WALLS and fences, we would have less of this to worry about. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted June 9, 2022 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 9, 2022 Just now, racer254 said: Seems that with more WALLS and fences, we would have less of this to worry about. Cute but this case involved the northern border. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sleepybrew Posted June 9, 2022 Share Posted June 9, 2022 didn't look too well protected when they accused them of whipping the illegals. actually looked like they were getting fucked over. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted June 9, 2022 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 9, 2022 3 minutes ago, sleepybrew said: didn't look too well protected when they accused them of whipping the illegals. actually looked like they were getting fucked over. Well don’t worry because they can now violate YOUR constitutional rights without fear of reprisal….enjoy! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted June 9, 2022 Share Posted June 9, 2022 4 minutes ago, Jimmy Snacks said: Cute but this case involved the northern border. And when did I say anything regarding north or southern border? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member EvilBird Posted June 9, 2022 Gold Member Share Posted June 9, 2022 3 minutes ago, sleepybrew said: didn't look too well protected when they accused them of whipping the illegals. actually looked like they were getting fucked over. We’ll Trump was President then. just like defund the Police. Now Joe wants to fund the Police and I don’t see any cities being burned down by Obama’s shadow Government. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sleepybrew Posted June 9, 2022 Share Posted June 9, 2022 1 minute ago, Jimmy Snacks said: Well don’t worry because they can now violate YOUR constitutional rights without fear of reprisal….enjoy! aah, they could before. nothing new here 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted June 9, 2022 Share Posted June 9, 2022 Just now, EvilBird said: We’ll Trump was President then. just like defund the Police. Now Joe wants to fund the Police and I don’t see any cities being burned down by Obama’s shadow Government. Are you really this dumb? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member EvilBird Posted June 9, 2022 Gold Member Share Posted June 9, 2022 Just now, Mainecat said: Are you really this dumb? Are you a racist spoiled entitled DINK who doesn’t practice what Political bullshit he preaches? Answer : Yes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted June 9, 2022 Share Posted June 9, 2022 More shiney object bullshit to get your attention away from something else Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted June 9, 2022 Share Posted June 9, 2022 Its a tough job and there are alot of bad characters operating on the border. If they are using excessive force on human traffickers I am not going to cry about it. Dig a hole and put them in it as far as I am concerned. Then you dont have to worry about law suits 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted June 9, 2022 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 9, 2022 (edited) Qualified immunity is needed but must be managed well. In this particular case the little I've read on it I'd say the SC got it wrong. I think the agent did abuse his authority and the rights of the Inn owner. Note the actions of the agent and phrase "allegedly" is used multiple times in the actual decision. WTF he rather did or didn't and that makes a significant difference. As with any SC case you really need to know what is up for appeal before truly knowing. It could be procedural or an actual constitutional decision. Edited June 9, 2022 by Highmark 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted June 9, 2022 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 9, 2022 1 hour ago, Anler said: Its a tough job and there are alot of bad characters operating on the border. If they are using excessive force on human traffickers I am not going to cry about it. Dig a hole and put them in it as far as I am concerned. Then you dont have to worry about law suits Same arguments used after 9-11 which led to the Patriot Act and Department of Homeland Security…didn’t realize that you supported this.🤷🏻 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted June 9, 2022 Share Posted June 9, 2022 4 minutes ago, Jimmy Snacks said: Same arguments used after 9-11 which led to the Patriot Act and Department of Homeland Security…didn’t realize that you supported this.🤷🏻 Go back some pages in your note book I’m sure you’ll find it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted June 9, 2022 Share Posted June 9, 2022 11 minutes ago, Jimmy Snacks said: Same arguments used after 9-11 which led to the Patriot Act and Department of Homeland Security…didn’t realize that you supported this.🤷🏻 Really I am fundamentally opposed to it but like I said if its human traffickers I would prefer they just dig a hole and put them in it. If it is just immigrants trying to escape I dont support the abuse. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted June 9, 2022 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 9, 2022 42 minutes ago, Anler said: Really I am fundamentally opposed to it but like I said if its human traffickers I would prefer they just dig a hole and put them in it. If it is just immigrants trying to escape I dont support the abuse. I agree with that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.