Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Federal Reserve Initiates End Game As Trump Heads To White House


jtssrx

Recommended Posts

Federal Reserve Initiates End Game As Trump Heads To White House

Submitted by Brandon Smith via Alt-Market.com,

20161222_trump.jpg

For years, alternative economic analysts have been warning that the “miraculous” rise in U.S. stock markets has been the symptom of wider central bank intervention and that this will result in dire future consequences. We have heard endless lies and rationalizations as to why this could not be so, and why the U.S. “recovery” is real.  At the beginning of 2016, the former head of the Dallas branch of the Federal Reserve crushed all the skeptics and vindicated our position in an interview with CNBC where he stated:

“What the Fed did — and I was part of that group — is we front-loaded a tremendous market rally, starting in 2009.It’s sort of what I call the “reverse Whimpy factor” — give me two hamburgers today for one tomorrow. I’m not surprised that almost every index you can look at … was down significantly.” [Referring to the results in the stock market after the Fed raised rates in December.] 

Fisher continued his warning (though his predictions in my view are wildly conservative or deliberately muted):

“…I was warning my colleagues, “Don’t go wobbly if we have a 10-20 percent correction at some point. … Everybody you talk to … has been warning that these markets are heavily priced.”

Here is the issue  stocks are a mostly meaningless factor when considering the economic health of a nation. Equities are a casino based on nothing but the luck of the draw when it comes to news headlines, central banker statements and algorithmic computers. Today, as Fischer openly admitted, stocks are a purely manipulated indicator representing nothing but the amount of stimulus central banks are willing to pour into them through various channels.

Even with the incredible monetary support pooled together by international financiers, returns on equities investments continue to remain mostly flat.  It would seem that the propping up of indexes like the Dow has been only for the sake of keeping up appearances. For many people, revenue is barely being generated.

Unfortunately, the majority of Americans do not care to educate themselves on the finer points of finance. Their only relation to the health of the economy is their daily glance at the Dow. If it is green, or at all time highs, they assume that all is well, even if their gut is telling them something is not quite right.

The elites that stand at the helm of the Federal Reserve understand this dynamic very well. They are not stupid. They know that the whole of the global economy could be in a shambles but as long as stocks remain positive the masses will continue to ignore reality until the flames of destabilization are at their very doorsteps.

With this fact in mind one might think that the Fed would consider it in their best interest to keep stimulus measures operating indefinitely; but that is not what they are doing.

In fact, the Fed along with other central banks like the ECB has been slowly peeling back pillars of support from markets that have been in place since 2008-2009 and leaving the system open to a crisis event that should have been dealt with years ago. I examined this process of deliberate destabilization in my article 'The Global Economic Reset Has Begun.'

In that piece I outlined the three major pillars holding up the U.S. market system and certain parts of our economy and how they were being systematically removed.

The first pillar was the use of bailouts and quantitative easing measures. These were diminished through the implementation of the Fed “taper,” which I predicted would happen three months prior that year.

The second pillar was the use of near zero interest rates, which allowed numerous banks and corporations to access low-cost and no-cost overnight loans from the Fed. These companies then used these loans in large part to support a never-ending program of stock buybacks, which reduced the stock pool and artificially boosted the values of the remaining stocks.  I predicted in August of 2015 that the Fed would hike interest rates and that this would be the beginning of the end for the stock buyback bonanza. The Fed hiked rates in December of that year.

This process of removing backdoor manipulation through low interest rates should be our main concern right now. Early in 2016 I believed that the Fed would reach a position in which it would finally unleash a series of rate hikes. I did not think they would be so blatant as to wait until right after the U.S. presidential election to do so. I was wrong.

This is why I eventually predicted the launch of a series of rate hikes starting right after the election of Donald Trump in my article 'World Suffers From Trump Shell Shock  Here’s What Will Happen Next.' The Fed has now once again hiked interest rates with assertions that they will be “accelerating” such hikes throughout 2017.

As I have been arguing for most of the past year,the election of Donald Trump was inevitable and would precede the triggering of the final stage of our ongoing economic crisis. I came to realize that the Fed’s timing of their latest rate hike is highly strategic. Not only does it set the stage for a series of hikes that will crush U.S. stock markets this coming year and finally shock the public out of their fiscal stupor, but it also maneuvers the crisis right into the lap of Donald Trump and the conservative movements that support him.

Beyond this, it perpetuates an increasing Left/Right division in America. Think about it  during a fiscal crisis under Trump, tiggered by accumulating Fed rate hikes, liberals will immediately set upon Trump as the culprit, while conservatives will immediately defend Trump as a victim of Federal Reserve meddling.

The Federal Reserve and the mainstream media are already composing the narrative by stating that Trump's potential economic policies and a widening budget deficit would REQUIRE higher rates at a faster pace in order to be accommodated.

I have heard arguments from some that this tactic would simply not work. That people would “never buy” a narrative in which Trump and conservatives are blamed for a market collapse that was at least eight years in the making. I have to say, this view is incredibly naive.

I understand why people would want to embrace the notion that the public is as savvy as the liberty movement when looking at economic events, but this simply isn’t reality. A large portion of the U.S. population identifies with the “Left” end of the political spectrum. We have already seen how they react in the face of a Trump election win. They are predisposed to believe that Trump is responsible for a market crash regardless of the facts. Not to mention, much of the rest of the world is economically ignorant and will likely jump on the anti-conservative bandwagon during a crisis as well.

But the real master stroke of this strategy on the part of the elites is that it creates the perfect platform for the destruction of the U.S. dollar’s world reserve status  the third and final pillar I mentioned months ago that is supporting our economic system.

Imagine that the Fed’s rate hike frenzy sparks an open feud between the central bank and Trump? Some people might say “Good! Shut the bastards down!” However, this is exactly what the elites want. With the Fed “at odds” with the president of the U.S., faith in the U.S. dollar will plummet. Its world reserve status will be destroyed. And instead of being blamed on central banks, the majority of people around the world will claim it was the fault of Trump.

With a historically sufficient excuse for the end of dollar dominance in hand, the elites can move forward with their great global reset, which includes the replacement of the dollar with the IMF’s special drawing rights as the go-to reserve currency mechanism. The SDR basket is an essential bridge in the formation of a single global monetary authority and a true single global currency.

I believe that the Fed will not only continue hiking interest rates throughout 2017, but that some of these rate hikes may be LARGER than many people expect (50 basis points or more). I believe this will be designed to foster extreme tensions between the executive branch and the central bank.

A few months ago I would have said that Trump may or “may not” be aware of this dynamic and the potential that he is a scapegoat. Now that I have seen Trump’s cabinet picks which include neo-con and Goldman Sachs alumni, I have little doubt that he is fully cognizant of the plan.  I will be writing more on the issue of Trump as a "Trojan horse" in my next article.  In the meantime I would point out that all of the elements of psychological support for stock markets will also disappear in the face of a Trump verses establishment narrative.

All those leftist media outlets cherry picking economic stats and telling half truths to support the recovery lie now have no reason to continue cheerleading for the economy. I expect that propaganda rags like Reuters and Bloomberg will quickly change their tune with Trump in the Oval Office and begin a consistent chorus of negative financial data. Not only will the Fed remove all support from the system, but the mainstream media will be pounding day traders with the kind of “doom and gloom” headlines that they have been criticizing us for over the years.

Make no mistake, the election of Trump may have some in the liberty movement ready to pack up their preps and forget about any national crisis in their lifetimes, but the truth is, vigilance is needed now more than ever. I said it before the election and I’ll say it today  do not get comfortable; the times are about to get even more interesting.


Sent from my iPhone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said:

flat-earth-vs-round-earth.jpg

See I thought you were better then Snowrider Vince?!!

 

besides it looks like this. 

 

Also when any of you can show me curvature or demonstrate to me with a scientific experiment that curvature exists I'll believe we are a ball. Until then I'll question it. Here's the Chicago skyline seen from 75 miles away in Michigan here's a video of it being shown it's not a mirage 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o37t6iBS_q4

 

 

 

IMG_0418.PNG

IMG_0444.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Explain to me why we can't sail or fly off the edge of the earth and I will believe you... unless you think we can create super computers but somehow can't do the basic math to counteract some silly flatearther principle that keeps us all going in Magic circles. Jesus... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, xtralettucetomatoe580 said:

Explain to me why we can't sail or fly off the edge of the earth and I will believe you... unless you think we can create super computers but somehow can't do the basic math to counteract some silly flatearther principle that keeps us all going in Magic circles. Jesus... 

My son... Our father likes JS, he may not be bright or understand science, but he is a kind soul. 

Peace be with you, and Make Christmas Great Again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said:

Explain to me why we can't sail or fly off the edge of the earth and I will believe you... unless you think we can create super computers but somehow can't do the basic math to counteract some silly flatearther principle that keeps us all going in Magic circles. Jesus... 

Why do you assume there's an edge? 

Sone people think we are under a dome. I think that's far fetched. Think of the Truman show. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Momorider said:

In all seriousness JT it's real difficult for anyone to take anything you post seriously after the flat earth insanity :guzzle: 

I don't really care what any of you think. Im not driven by people's approval.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said:

So there is no edge to a flat planet? What is the Truman show reference? Actually, I am not having this debate. Makes me feel too fucking stupid even addressing it.

It's not a debate it's s conversation. 

 

There are people who believe we live under a dome. Have seen the liquor commercial that shows the rocket going into space and all the sudden it breaks through and its water. Some believe space is water and we are under a dome. Not my theory. 

 

My main issues with the spinning ball is I don't think we spin and I can't find curvature I can list tons of examples of things that show there is no curvature or at least not as it's said to be. The Chicago skyline for exsaple should be 1200 feet below the curve of the planet at the distances its observed at. Air travel, explain how flights that go from east to west are the sane duration. Example flights from New York to LA then back from LA to New York are the same in duration. How is this possible on a globe that spins 1000mph at the equator and 750mph in the middle of North America. Flights heading west should take much less time as the earth is spinning 750 mph towards you. Flights heading east should have to fly faster then the earth spins to catch up to their destinations. In a lot of cases the easterly flights get there sooner with the jet stream but not always. The argument will be something about gravity or the planes are in the atmosphere but neither explain it. 

Oh and gravity the magic answer for everything. Gravity keeps us and every thing including the oceans attached to the spinning ball. Oh and people who live in Australia live on the bottom of the planet upside down but feel no affect because of gravity. 

 

Answer me this do believe in a creator or the Big Bang. I can tell you I don't believe we are the result of an accidental explosion. 

 

Let the laughter commence 

Edited by jtssrx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, jtssrx said:

See I thought you were better then Snowrider Vince?!!

 

besides it looks like this. 

 

Also when any of you can show me curvature or demonstrate to me with a scientific experiment that curvature exists I'll believe we are a ball. Until then I'll question it. Here's the Chicago skyline seen from 75 miles away in Michigan here's a video of it being shown it's not a mirage 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o37t6iBS_q4

 

 

 

IMG_0418.PNG

IMG_0444.JPG

75 miles across the earth would result in 1.125 degrees curvature at the equator 2.25 degrees at 45 degrees. If you are trying to say that because you can see buildings in that picture because the earth is flat, you are a moron.

Edited by Boered
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
7 hours ago, jtssrx said:

It's not a debate it's s conversation. 

 

There are people who believe we live under a dome. Have seen the liquor commercial that shows the rocket going into space and all the sudden it breaks through and its water. Some believe space is water and we are under a dome. Not my theory. 

 

My main issues with the spinning ball is I don't think we spin and I can't find curvature I can list tons of examples of things that show there is no curvature or at least not as it's said to be. The Chicago skyline for exsaple should be 1200 feet below the curve of the planet at the distances its observed at. Air travel, explain how flights that go from east to west are the sane duration. Example flights from New York to LA then back from LA to New York are the same in duration. How is this possible on a globe that spins 1000mph at the equator and 750mph in the middle of North America. Flights heading west should take much less time as the earth is spinning 750 mph towards you. Flights heading east should have to fly faster then the earth spins to catch up to their destinations. In a lot of cases the easterly flights get there sooner with the jet stream but not always. The argument will be something about gravity or the planes are in the atmosphere but neither explain it. 

Oh and gravity the magic answer for everything. Gravity keeps us and every thing including the oceans attached to the spinning ball. Oh and people who live in Australia live on the bottom of the planet upside down but feel no affect because of gravity. 

 

Answer me this do believe in a creator or the Big Bang. I can tell you I don't believe we are the result of an accidental explosion. 

 

Let the laughter commence 

You're pure gold. :lmao: Your post exemplifies your warped thought process....and transcends your politics......which many on here agree with :lol: Now I can see how so many morons believe anything posted on the internet and you're a perfect examplination for the rise of fake news. :lmao: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, jtssrx said:

It's not a debate it's s conversation. 

 

There are people who believe we live under a dome. Have seen the liquor commercial that shows the rocket going into space and all the sudden it breaks through and its water. Some believe space is water and we are under a dome. Not my theory. 

 

My main issues with the spinning ball is I don't think we spin and I can't find curvature I can list tons of examples of things that show there is no curvature or at least not as it's said to be. The Chicago skyline for exsaple should be 1200 feet below the curve of the planet at the distances its observed at. Air travel, explain how flights that go from east to west are the sane duration. Example flights from New York to LA then back from LA to New York are the same in duration. How is this possible on a globe that spins 1000mph at the equator and 750mph in the middle of North America. Flights heading west should take much less time as the earth is spinning 750 mph towards you. Flights heading east should have to fly faster then the earth spins to catch up to their destinations. In a lot of cases the easterly flights get there sooner with the jet stream but not always. The argument will be something about gravity or the planes are in the atmosphere but neither explain it. 

Oh and gravity the magic answer for everything. Gravity keeps us and every thing including the oceans attached to the spinning ball. Oh and people who live in Australia live on the bottom of the planet upside down but feel no affect because of gravity. 

 

Answer me this do believe in a creator or the Big Bang. I can tell you I don't believe we are the result of an accidental explosion. 

 

Let the laughter commence 

You're on a flight and you have to go to the bathroom.  There's one 15 seats ahead of you and another 15 seats behind you.  Does it take longer to get to the one ahead of you?  Does it take less time to get to the one behind you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, motonoggin said:

Jesus dude. The flight thing demonstrates a clear inability to grasp simple physics. :lol:

What simple physics? 

Some very smart people believe it's flat. 

Also I'm asking you can you show me curvature? Don't give me anything from NASA they are frauds 

you were taught the heliocentric model. That's all you know 

IMG_0010.JPG

IMG_0015.JPG

Edited by jtssrx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...