hwytohell Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 (edited) http://www.bostonherald.com/news/columnists/kimberly_atkins/2016/11/atkins_time_for_jill_stein_hillary_clinton_to_call_it_quits Edited November 28, 2016 by hwytohell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 Lmao. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 Wow a lot of people hate Stein over on DU. Blaming her for clintons loss rather than clinton being a piece of shit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 Just now, Sludgey said: Wow a lot of people hate Stein over on DU. Blaming her for clintons loss rather than clinton being a piece of shit Self crit isn't their strong suit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USA Contributing Member $poorsledder$ Posted November 28, 2016 USA Contributing Member Share Posted November 28, 2016 Nothing more than a DNC fundraiser. Hillary said it best, "What difference does it make?". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 Just now, $poorsledder$ said: Nothing more than a DNC fundraiser. Hillary said it best, "What difference does it make?". It's the Green Party raising money for the recounts, not dems. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USA Contributing Member $poorsledder$ Posted November 28, 2016 USA Contributing Member Share Posted November 28, 2016 1 minute ago, motonoggin said: It's the Green Party raising money for the recounts, not dems. OK, nothing more than a Jill Stein / Green Party fundraiser. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 Just now, $poorsledder$ said: OK, nothing more than a Jill Stein / Green Party fundraiser. I'd suggest some reading before you look even more foolish. http://www.jill2016.com/recountfaq Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 10 minutes ago, motonoggin said: I'd suggest some reading before you look even more foolish. http://www.jill2016.com/recountfaq See, that would just be great if those were true. If it was true, NH would be involved as well, but it's not. When you purposely choose only states that went for 1 side, for me it puts up a big flag that says PARTISAN. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 2 minutes ago, racer254 said: See, that would just be great if those were true. If it was true, NH would be involved as well, but it's not. When you purposely choose only states that went for 1 side, for me it puts up a big flag that says PARTISAN. Where can I read about NH? Is their recount deadline still open? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 3 minutes ago, motonoggin said: Where can I read about NH? Is their recount deadline still open? No, the dead line was closed in NH before Stein even thought about this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 Just now, racer254 said: No, the dead line was closed in NH before Stein even thought about this. And Trump did nothing? You're going to rely on a minor party to protect the vote, eh? Sounds like a great plan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 I mean, come the fuck on, at least make a logical fallacy with a state that still is eligible to file for a recount. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 11 minutes ago, racer254 said: See, that would just be great if those were true. If it was true, NH would be involved as well, but it's not. When you purposely choose only states that went for 1 side, for me it puts up a big flag that says PARTISAN. Trump said the election was rigged. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 1 minute ago, Mainecat said: Trump said the election was rigged. What about you? What do you think? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 6 minutes ago, motonoggin said: And Trump did nothing? You're going to rely on a minor party to protect the vote, eh? Sounds like a great plan. 5 minutes ago, motonoggin said: I mean, come the fuck on, at least make a logical fallacy with a state that still is eligible to file for a recount. Poor planning by stein. OR MAYBE PERFECT PLANNING. Take off those glasses, your partisanship is showing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 4 minutes ago, racer254 said: What about you? What do you think? It very well could be. The Russians hacked e-mails. We the US hack other countries. https://youtu.be/6OXniUutor4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtralettucetomatoe580 Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 I like the idea of accountability in this. I wish that it wasn't shrouded in uncertainty of motive though. Every election should be verified if deemed there may be foul play. The results will not change. If anything it allows Trump to point and prove that he won fair and square, and it will close down the fringe left from saying he stole something after the fact. Not sure why he wouldn't be behind this. At this point it doesn't matter if she won by 200,000,000 popular votes. All that matters are the ones determined and outlined in the US Constitution. Everything else is whining. Do the recount, do it with integrity, move the fuck on. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toslow Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 3 minutes ago, Mainecat said: It very well could be. The Russians hacked e-mails. We the US hack other countries. https://youtu.be/6OXniUutor4 that pretty much explains that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 36 minutes ago, racer254 said: Poor planning by stein. OR MAYBE PERFECT PLANNING. Take off those glasses, your partisanship is showing. Tinfoil hat time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 I mean, talk about fucking lazy freeloaders. Why won't Stein do a recount that could benefit my candidate instead?! Wah.... Why didn't Trump do something? Why are you demanding a minor party do it your way when your candidate won't lift a finger? Fucking idiots. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 2 minutes ago, motonoggin said: I mean, talk about fucking lazy freeloaders. Why won't Stein do a recount that could benefit my candidate instead?! Wah.... Why didn't Trump do something? Why are you demanding a minor party do it your way when your candidate won't lift a finger? Fucking idiots. Lazy freeloaders. HA! From a guy who wants no leader, no master. You're entire existence, by your own words, make you not only a freeloader, but a leech on society.... a parasite. I bet in the case of chaos, you will be the first to take a seat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmo Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 Clinton just threw away her get out of jail free card that Trump was gracious enough to provide her after the election. I hope he hammers that bitch and goes all in with prosecuting her. She has no clue about consequences. Idiot. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 4 minutes ago, motonoggin said: I mean, talk about fucking lazy freeloaders. Why won't Stein do a recount that could benefit my candidate instead?! Wah.... Why didn't Trump do something? Why are you demanding a minor party do it your way when your candidate won't lift a finger? Fucking idiots. Every election lost by a democrat causes a recount lately. I am all about election integrity, but when voter id is brought up by republicans, democrats are against it because they say it doesn't happen. It's all about wasting money and time with them and I am just sick of the whining from them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mileage Psycho Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 The Clinton campaign on the Jill Stein fueled recount Quote The Clinton campaign had investigated the matter extensively. Elias said the campaign had “lawyers and data scientists and analysts combing over the results to spot anomalies” and had also “monitored and staffed the post-election canvasses — where voting machine tapes are compared to poll-books, provisional ballots are resolved, and all of the math is double checked from election night.” He said the campaign had also met with outside experts and “attempted to systematically catalogue and investigate every theory that has been presented to us within our ability to do so.” Now that a recount effort was underway, Elias said that it was “important” to participate in the proceedings. He played down the idea that the recount would change the outcome. “We do so fully aware that the number of votes separating Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in the closest of these states — Michigan — well exceeds the largest margin ever overcome in a recount,” Elias said. “But regardless of the potential to change the outcome in any of the states, we feel it is important, on principle, to ensure our campaign is legally represented in any court proceedings and represented on the ground in order to monitor the recount process itself.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2016/11/26/clinton-campaign-will-participate-in-wisconsin-recount-with-an-eye-on-outside-interference-lawyer-says/?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_pn-recount-1234pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.ee33ba2af4d7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.