Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

More E-Mails?


XCR1250

Recommended Posts

 
 
The FBI Uncovers Even More Clinton Emails
 


The government malfeasance in the Clinton email scandal is seeming never-ending.

The State Department just confessed to a court that FBI found more Clinton emails that were then over to State for review. In the November 15, 2019 filing, the State Department informs the court that the FBI located additional Clinton emails that potentially had not been previously released:

[T]he Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) recently sent [the State Department] additional documents as part of the ongoing inter-agency consultation process in connection with other FOIA litigation. [The State Department] is working to determine whether that set of documents includes any responsive, non-duplicative agency records that have not already been processed. [The State Department] will promptly update [Judicial Watch] and the Court once that initial review is complete.

The FBI filed this court ordered joint status report in response to our May 6, 2015, FOIA lawsuit (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-00687)). Our FOIA lawsuit seeks all emails sent and received by Hillary Clinton and other records about her non-governmental email account.

Earlier this year, Judicial Watch announced that it received 756 pages of emails that were among the materials Clinton tried to delete or destroy, several of which were classified and were transmitted over her unsecure, non-“state.gov” email system.  This production was supposed to be the final production of Clinton emails.  Judicial Watch estimates that the FBI being only able to recover or find approximately 5,000, including classified material, of the 33,000 government emails Clinton removed and tried to destroy. The FBI uncovered 72,000 pages of documents Clinton attempted to delete or did not otherwise disclose.

Now again, it appears the FBI has uncovered more Clinton email documents. 
 
You may recall that last week we released FBI emails showing that the FBI’s top lawyer gave deferential treatment to the attorney representing Hillary Clinton’s top aides implicated in the mass deletion of Clinton’s emails.
 
So it is astonishing news that the FBI mysteriously found more Clinton emails. Were they on Anthony Weiner’s laptop? At James Comey’s house? Or on Peter Strzok’s cell phone? This disturbing development further highlights how the fix was in on the Clinton email scandal and why a criminal investigation needs to be reopened by Attorney General Barr.
 
In separate Judicial Watch FOIA litigation, a federal court will soon rule on whether Hillary Clinton and her top aide can be questioned under oath by our lawyers about the email and Benghazi controversies. The court has already granted us additional discovery.
 
The court ordered discovery into three specific areas: whether Secretary Clinton’s use of a private email server was intended to stymie FOIA; whether the State Department’s intent to settle this case in late 2014 and early 2015 amounted to bad faith; and whether the State Department has adequately searched for records responsive to our request. The court specifically ordered Obama administration senior State Department officials, lawyers and Clinton aides to be deposed or answer written questions under oath. The court ruled that the Clinton email system was “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency.” (This Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit led directly to the disclosure of the Clinton email system in 2015.)
 
When Hillary Clinton’s people used software called BleachBit to destroy her emails so that “even God can’t read them,” as Rep. Trey Gowdy put it, she must have thought she was rid of this threat of incrimination for good. I’ll let you know what is this latest batch as soon as we find out…
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, racer254 said:

I don't disagree with you, never know how far that web is connected.

I had a smidge of hope right after the election that Trump might hire an AG that would dig deep and expose corruption. I knew the second he appointed Jeff fucking Sessions that would not be the case

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, f7ben said:

I had a smidge of hope right after the election that Trump might hire an AG that would dig deep and expose corruption. I knew the second he appointed Jeff fucking Sessions that would not be the case

Trump could have all the dirt in the world on the clintons, but somewhere, somehow, they would get away with it.  They have too many corrupt individuals that are willing to sacrifice themselves and their own integrity to keep that family out of jail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think its more so everyone that thought,  hey i will scratch your back if you scratch mine" was a good idea when dealing with Hillary and Co..  With the power she had over the DNC,, hell the entire government apparently they all thought they were safe. now they have to sacrifice themselves in an attempt to make things go away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bussman said:

How does a president lock anybody up whatsoever? They can’t. Seems to me you’d need to clean up the corruption in the DOJ and all the courts first. 

And the President would have to be opposed to corruption. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DriftBusta said:

You think the IG report is going to be a big nothing burger?  I’m going to keep an open mind for now.  

You have an empty mind.... it an open one. Fucking moron

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bussman said:

How does a president lock anybody up whatsoever? They can’t. Seems to me you’d need to clean up the corruption in the DOJ and all the courts first. 

Does the president not appoint the AG and all of those under him in the doj???

Shocked you defended trump again

Trump himself said if he was elected she'd be behind bars

Quit your deflecting and just admit your ball gargling love of the orange retard. You'd be so much easier to take

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DriftBusta said:

You think the IG report is going to be a big nothing burger?  I’m going to keep an open mind for now.  

My opinion is that simply based on the historical record, no high level person is going to jail.

Doesn't have anything to do with an open mind or not, just has to do with being a realist about how the government operates. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
Just now, SSFB said:

My opinion is that simply based on the historical record, no high level person is going to jail.

Doesn't have anything to do with an open mind or not, just has to do with being a realist about how the government operates. 

this. it's not dem vs gop. It's them vs us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, f7ben said:

Does the president not appoint the AG and all of those under him in the doj???

Shocked you defended trump again

Trump himself said if he was elected she'd be behind bars

Quit your deflecting and just admit your ball gargling love of the orange retard. You'd be so much easier to take

You are dumb. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol



×
×
  • Create New...