ArcticCrusher Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 9 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said: someone starting out today on their own will work through what it takes to make it, no different than 20 or 30 years ago just different hoops to jump through. Most like you will stay in this great Country regardless of the situation - Times are a changin Thats total BS. Keep thinking the status quo will always be ok. The brain drain and talent drain never happened. Lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 13 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: Thats total BS. Keep thinking the status quo will always be ok. The brain drain and talent drain never happened. Lol. Aren't you the one that wants status quo? change nothing? "Times are a changin" doesn't mean status quo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 5 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said: Aren't you the one that wants status quo? change nothing? "Times are a changin" doesn't mean status quo People will do whats better for themselves. Joe is stuck, the ones we need to keep are not and every country will welcome them. Its just the final push. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revrnd Posted September 29, 2017 Author Share Posted September 29, 2017 http://www.macleans.ca/politics/justin-trudeaus-un-motto-dont-make-trouble-wear-silly-socks/ Saw a segment on CTV this morning w/ a Rohingya(n) refugee now living in Canada. He was wondering why the PM never mentioned anything about the Myanmar crisis. Fail, to answer your comment about me quoting the CBC. If I had linked something posted from the Sun, you would've said it was BS. This isn't the only online content that is asking "WTF?" when discussing JT's speech to the UN. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 2 minutes ago, revrnd said: http://www.macleans.ca/politics/justin-trudeaus-un-motto-dont-make-trouble-wear-silly-socks/ Saw a segment on CTV this morning w/ a Rohingya(n) refugee now living in Canada. He was wondering why the PM never mentioned anything about the Myanmar crisis. Fail, to answer your comment about me quoting the CBC. If I had linked something posted from the Sun, you would've said it was BS. This isn't the only online content that is asking "WTF?" when discussing JT's speech to the UN. His un speech was strange SUN only posts negative Liberal and positive Conservative stuff - so the odd time its worth reading if you are looking for 1 of 2 of those things Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snopro31 Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 its funny. trudeau has been using the tax loopholes himself. he just got a bitch slap from Prime Minister Scheer 2019 over it. and as usual........NO ANSWER from Castro. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 Its time for real change and toss out the garbage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 7 hours ago, snopro31 said: its funny. trudeau has been using the tax loopholes himself. he just got a bitch slap from Prime Minister Scheer 2019 over it. and as usual........NO ANSWER from Castro. It gets worst than that. One of the companies to greatly benefit from the tax changes is none other than Morneau Schepel, so now we could have a conflict of interest for the finance minister. POS. Quote During question period, Conservative after Conservative pointed out that earlier in the day at a meeting of the finance committee, expert testimony had indicated that Morneau Shepell would be one of the main beneficiaries of the move to increase taxes on passive investment in private corporations http://nationalpost.com/opinion/john-ivison-accusations-morneau-breached-conflict-of-interest-screen-increase-tension-over-tax-reforms 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 8 hours ago, snopro31 said: its funny. trudeau has been using the tax loopholes himself. he just got a bitch slap from Prime Minister Scheer 2019 over it. and as usual........NO ANSWER from Castro. how is using a legal loophole and then closing that loophole a bad thing? what is your suggestion? to let him continue to use it or to close it I say lets make more loopholes, lets get this economy rolling Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 1 hour ago, ArcticCrusher said: It gets worst than that. One of the companies to greatly benefit from the tax changes is none other than Morneau Schepel, so now we could have a conflict of interest for the finance minister. POS. http://nationalpost.com/opinion/john-ivison-accusations-morneau-breached-conflict-of-interest-screen-increase-tension-over-tax-reforms How does he benefit? will he pay even less taxes under the changes? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 26 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said: How does he benefit? will he pay even less taxes under the changes? No he won't pay any more taxes and MS does not have any tax consequences by anything proposed. MS will benefit greatly from the anticipated shift into IPP's that his company administers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 29 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said: How does he benefit? will he pay even less taxes under the changes? His trusts are not affected by the changes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 Just now, ArcticCrusher said: No he won't pay any more taxes and MS does not have any tax consequences by anything proposed. MS will benefit greatly from the anticipated shift into IPP's that his company administers. so you are angry because he won't pay more? If he did pay more would all these changes be okay with you? Are you against smart business people? or just Liberal ones Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 2 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: His trusts are not affected by the changes. Just his? If we can tax those too would you be happy? what are you asking for or do you even know? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 1 minute ago, 1trailmaker said: so you are angry because he won't pay more? If he did pay more would all these changes be okay with you? Are you against smart business people? or just Liberal ones Its a conflict of interest if you change the rules to benefit yourself. He needs to step aside. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 3 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said: Just his? If we can tax those too would you be happy? what are you asking for or do you even know? Good grief. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 Just now, ArcticCrusher said: Good grief. well answer the question, you made all the posts about it today. What do you want? Just say it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 4 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: Its a conflict of interest if you change the rules to benefit yourself. He needs to step aside. lol - seems to be something you say often about the liberals Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 4 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said: well answer the question, you made all the posts about it today. What do you want? Just say it He probably should since most of it likely flowed from a private corp, but the buffoon had already depleted most of his inheritance, so what would be the point. So much for sunny ways. http://business.financialpost.com/news/economy/canadas-gdp-unchanged-in-july-on-oil-slump-key-takeaways Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 4 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said: lol - seems to be something you say often about the liberals There will be a natural push to use IPP's (actually PPP's would be better) from the fallout and his company stands to benefit. Something you don't understand? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 3 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: He probably should since most of it likely flowed from a private corp, but the buffoon had already depleted most of his inheritance, so what would be the point. So much for sunny ways. http://business.financialpost.com/news/economy/canadas-gdp-unchanged-in-july-on-oil-slump-key-takeaways so now 8 months of growth in a row is a bad thing Even with very little growth in August and September, Canada’s economy would still probably be poised to grow at a rate of 2 per cent or more in the third quarter. I think the Conservatives and you better stick to bashing personal people since the economy is strong Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 5 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: There will be a natural push to use IPP's (actually PPP's would be better) from the fallout and his company stands to benefit. Something you don't understand? Just him? or will many others continue to benefit? Pretty simple question part 2 Should he be taxed more? would that be better Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 5 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said: Just him? or will many others continue to benefit? Pretty simple question part 2 Should he be taxed more? would that be better Don't you think the same rules should apply to all corps then? But its a bad idea, that kills investment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 9 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said: so now 8 months of growth in a row is a bad thing Even with very little growth in August and September, Canada’s economy would still probably be poised to grow at a rate of 2 per cent or more in the third quarter. I think the Conservatives and you better stick to bashing personal people since the economy is strong Its not strong, but its OK and has been for a while. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 1 minute ago, ArcticCrusher said: Don't you think the same rules should apply to all corps then? But its a bad idea, that kills investment. so you are okay with that taxes as long as it includes everyone? NO - I think you are okay with anyone that can legally avoid paying taxes except liberals AC you got your self into this trap on words - try to get out of it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.