Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

A small collection of neoliberal hypocrisy.


Recommended Posts

14324114_987195521427000_3396878888711520172_o.jpg

US President GWB did not initiate the GWOT.

He merely prosecuted it ineptly.

We're not looking for trouble. We're simply trying to defend the United States Constitution enumerates.

And if that means killing pseudo-religious zealots sworn to do harm to U.S. and our citizens ("death to America!"), then enjoy your 70 virgins & a mule, SUCKERS!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, sear said:

14324114_987195521427000_3396878888711520172_o.jpg

US President GWB did not initiate the GWOT.

He merely prosecuted it ineptly.

We're not looking for trouble. We're simply trying to defend the United States Constitution enumerates.

And if that means killing pseudo-religious zealots sworn to do harm to U.S. and our citizens ("death to America!"), then enjoy your 70 virgins & a mule, SUCKERS!

We are absolutely looking for trouble. We are simultaneously funding them and fighting them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, sear said:

#6

Splendid.

A counter-punch is not aggression. It becomes defense AFTER the hostilities have been initiated.

Have you forgotten the shrub in the rubble?

What freedoms are we protecting by bombing other countries?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

" What freedoms are we protecting by bombing other countries?" #10

a) "Semantic infiltration" noted.

CORRECTION: We are not bombing / targeting "countries", the exact word YOU used.

We are targeting PERSONS, terrorists.

b) President GWB's GWOT that President Obama is prosecuting so successfully is defending Western civilization's standards of law, against the kind of ISIL "law" that allows putting a Jordanian pilot in a metal cage, dousing him with gasoline, and then setting him alight and delighting in the sadistic joy of watching him writhe in agony as he burns to death.

Any other questions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sear said:

#6

Splendid.

A counter-punch is not aggression. It becomes defense AFTER the hostilities have been initiated.

Have you forgotten the shrub in the rubble?

 

 

Seriously, you haven't learned how to quote yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, sear said:

" What freedoms are we protecting by bombing other countries?" #10

a) "Semantic infiltration" noted.

CORRECTION: We are not bombing / targeting "countries", the exact word YOU used.

We are targeting PERSONS, terrorists.

b) President GWB's GWOT that President Obama is prosecuting so successfully is defending Western civilization's standards of law, against the kind of ISIL "law" that allows putting a Jordanian pilot in a metal cage, dousing him with gasoline, and then setting him alight and delighting in the sadistic joy of watching him writhe in agony as he burns to death.

Any other questions?

So isis is trying to implement their law here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol



×
×
  • Create New...