Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Is there anything in the US Constitution that mandates capitalism?


Recommended Posts

  • Platinum Contributing Member
1 hour ago, XC.Morrison said:

“Pursuit of happiness” isn’t in the Constitution though.  

Correct its in the DoI  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Highmark said:

They practice a more free form of capitalism than we do.

Just because they have significant social programs doesn't mean they aren't capitalist.  

They redistribute wealth, which in turn evens out the inherent inequities of a capitalistic system. 

Edited by spin_dry
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
11 minutes ago, spin_dry said:

They redistribute wealth, which in turn evens out the inherent inequities of a capitalistic system. 

:pc:  Not as equal as you think.  

https://www.ft.com/content/3b9566e4-941a-11e8-b747-fb1e803ee64e

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Zambroski said:

My "frustration"?  :lol: The Constitution (or the DoI) was not intended to depict the "correct" economic system but, using the terms of these documents, an outline can be established as to why Capitism is the best fit.  Now, it's not perfect...far from it.  But, it meets the goals of the majority.

Capitalism, BY FAR, permits more happiness than any other system.  It also raises more out of poverty and horrid conditions than any other system.  It is also the least government oppressive of any other system allowing citizens with desire to work and create their own successes without punishment....this is debatable because of taxes but, capitalism also allows for the most amount of socialistic plans to help others using those taxes so, another plus for the Capitalistic system.

Socialism has, by far, become the means for a governing power to interfere with free will and success in those that want it.  It puts the power in the hands of the government who then decides who shall "succeed" under it's own terms only if government maintains the power over such.  It does this all under the lie of "the greater good".  If power corrupts, history shows us that countries entering a purely socialist system easily lead to an completely authoritative regime (socialism/communism is not possible without it) where all power is concentrated in the governing bodies without any recourse by citizens and certainly no unbiased oversight.   History has also shown us the mass failures of this system.

I concur.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, frenchy said:

capitalists, the lot of them.

I saw a documentary recently about Sweden.  In the 70’s they shifted too far towards socialistic principles, a lot more power for unions and I’m sure tons more I can’t recall off the top of my head. They’ve since restructured and shifted more capitalistic and it’s helped their prosperity a lot.  The right balance is everything.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Highmark said:

Article requires a subscription  Sweden has similar wealth distribution to America with a major exception. Free college, excellent public housing and housing assistance. Strict guidelines for landlords and excellent healthcare reimbursement. There’s also well funded public pensions and additional social programs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, spin_dry said:

Article requires a subscription  Sweden has similar wealth distribution to America with a major exception. Free college, excellent public housing and housing assistance. Strict guidelines for landlords and excellent healthcare reimbursement. There’s also well funded public pensions and additional social programs. 

Yah all free  :lmao:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
7 hours ago, spin_dry said:

Article requires a subscription  Sweden has similar wealth distribution to America with a major exception. Free college, excellent public housing and housing assistance. Strict guidelines for landlords and excellent healthcare reimbursement. There’s also well funded public pensions and additional social programs. 

You can honestly say with a straight face thats the only differences econimically?   :lmao:   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Highmark said:

You can honestly say with a straight face thats the only differences econimically?   :lmao:   

It’s thpinnyvan if he’s talking he’s lying lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
1 hour ago, Duke KaBoom said:

It’s thpinnyvan if he’s talking he’s lying lol

Love the US/Scandinavian country comparisons in the broad sense.   Its amusing.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

3 hours ago, Highmark said:

You can honestly say with a straight face thats the only differences econimically?   :lmao:   

Of course not. They don’t spend money on never ending wars and a trillion dollar military. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
32 minutes ago, spin_dry said:

 

Of course not. They don’t spend money on never ending wars and a trillion dollar military. 

Well I agree there but there is a fuck of a lot more than that.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...