DriftBusta Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 13 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: cowards, every damn one of ya... Neither option was correct. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted March 25, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 25, 2019 29 minutes ago, oleroule said: what's the legal definition of collusion? also, what's the statute that makes it criminal? Coach Toolkit told me it’s a generic and catchall term but definitely not fluid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 9 minutes ago, DriftBusta said: Neither option was correct. Slinger is so stupid he would never think of that as a possibility. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jammin Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 51 minutes ago, steve from amherst said: 3. thinks the OP has gone right off the fucking deep end. 3 Yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted March 25, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 25, 2019 Fine....here's my answer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 25, 2019 Author Share Posted March 25, 2019 35 minutes ago, DriftBusta said: Neither option was correct. what option would you like? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 25, 2019 Author Share Posted March 25, 2019 gee, here i thought alot of people in here knew there was "interaction" with russians about helping trump, bit it just didn't meet the definition of collusion. so it's skidmark, tom, snake, and steve from the rww side. did i miss anyone else? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 25, 2019 Author Share Posted March 25, 2019 11 minutes ago, Highmark said: Fine....here's my answer. you already gave your answer "adoption: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted March 25, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 25, 2019 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: you already gave your answer "adoption: No I didn't. Just reporting what Jr. told congress. If he lied why wasn't he charged? Just type adoption in the search portion and see for yourself. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4464062-Donald-Trump-Jr-Senate-Judiciary-Committee.html Page 16. Edited March 25, 2019 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1jkw Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 Whatever happened, it didn't meet the legal standard, and that's all that matters. You can't arrest someone for going 55mph when the speed limit is 55mph, just like you can't arrest someone for collusion if they aren't colluding under the standard of the law. Not that hard to figure out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 25, 2019 Author Share Posted March 25, 2019 3 minutes ago, 1jkw said: Whatever happened, it didn't meet the legal standard, and that's all that matters. You can't arrest someone for going 55mph when the speed limit is 55mph, just like you can't arrest someone for collusion if they aren't colluding under the standard of the law. Not that hard to figure out. that is true and i am not arguing that, nor is it the intent of this poll. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted March 25, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 25, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, Snoslinger said: cowards, every damn one of ya... Why would anyone vote for some made up scenarios fabricated by your completely wacked out thought processes from butt hurt island.. Edited March 25, 2019 by Rigid1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 25, 2019 Author Share Posted March 25, 2019 1 minute ago, Rigid1 said: Why would anyone vote for some made up scenarios fabricated by your completely wacked out thought processes from butt hurt island.. well earlier today some members made those statements, which i had trouble believing tbh. so one told me to start a poll to prove things, so i did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted March 25, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 25, 2019 (edited) 55 minutes ago, 1jkw said: Whatever happened, it didn't meet the legal standard, and that's all that matters. You can't arrest someone for going 55mph when the speed limit is 55mph, just like you can't arrest someone for collusion if they aren't colluding under the standard of the law. Not that hard to figure out. Actually LEO can give someone a ticket for going 55 in a 55 zone. Speed limits are guides for normal driving conditions. Its officers judgement if the conditions are less than ideal they can write you up for doing 40 in a 55. What you are saying is probably true on the obstruction charge. The collusion was proven not to be true. NO EVIDENCE doesn't mean NOT ENOUGH EVIDENCE. Mueller said NO EVIDENCE. Edited March 25, 2019 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1jkw Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 13 minutes ago, Highmark said: Actually LEO can give someone a ticket for going 55 in a 55 zone. Speed limits are guides for normal driving conditions. Its officers judgement if the conditions are less than ideal they can write you up for doing 40 in a 55. What you are saying is probably true on the obstruction charge. The collusion was proven not to be true. NO EVIDENCE doesn't mean NOT ENOUGH EVIDENCE. Mueller said NO EVIDENCE. Technically yes, and I should have stated under normal circumstances, was just trying to keep it simple. And yes there was no evidence of collusion in the legal sense and that is all that matters. What it doesn't mean is that there was no contact between the campaign and Russians, but the contact was legal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 2 hours ago, Snoslinger said: pick one of the options zero shame left Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 1 hour ago, 1jkw said: Whatever happened, it didn't meet the legal standard, and that's all that matters. You can't arrest someone for going 55mph when the speed limit is 55mph, just like you can't arrest someone for collusion if they aren't colluding under the standard of the law. Not that hard to figure out. I can prove that your mouth colludes with trucker's cocks in the Pennsylvania rest areas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1jkw Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 1 minute ago, Polaris 550 said: I can prove that your mouth colludes with trucker's cocks in the Pennsylvania rest areas. Don't fuck up every thread tranny. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 2 minutes ago, 1jkw said: Don't fuck up every thread tranny. Don't cry faggot...…………..you drew FIRST BLOOD. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry ginger Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 SMH your making all the right wing whackos look sane Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.