Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Wisconsin retirement system returns.


Recommended Posts

I’m sure glad that I’m not one to depend on this pension plan for my retirement. Grim results for 2018. Ended the year -3.3% on core  

U.S. financial markets struggled at the close of 2018. In October, the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&P 500 suffered significant losses, wiping out all gains for the year. Last month, the S&P 500 dropped more than 9.0 percent resulting in the index’s worst December performance since 1931 and worst annual performance since 2008. Emerging market stocks suffered the biggest losses in 2018. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index finished 2018 down 14.6 percent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, steve from amherst said:

Or more likely, up how much.

I’ve got about $450k in the fund. It’s not a ton, but it’s still a chunk. I’ve watched it grow at a nice steady clip since the 2008 crash. 2018 was the first year that it posted a loss. The yo-yo growth in the market is great for profit takers. I don’t see a big gain by year’s end. To much erratic messaging from this administration. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WRS retirement annuity payments to retirees cannot be reduced from a retirees initial settled payment,  that stays the same for the retirees lifetime no matter what, they can receive a yearly annuity  increase or decrease but never lower than the original payment..   The investments WRS makes or loses monies is from several different sources e.g. Stocks, Bonds, Equities, Fixed Income Investments & other investments such as rental properties and are how the "extra" monthly payments to retirees are figured and that they can take the "extra" money back by a system called "smoothing", and that's done both up & down over a 5 year period, never at once.

 Look at the online webinar at The Department of Employees Trust funds, "how rates and adjustments are determined" http://bit.ly/2SIrUAJ or contact ETF directly.

 A minus 3.3% will amount to about $30-$60 a month depending on how much the increased annuity payments are and only IF the retiree had ever received an increase. Drop in the Bucket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, XCR1250 said:

WRS retirement annuity payments to retirees cannot be reduced from a retirees initial settled payment,  that stays the same for the retirees lifetime no matter what, they can receive a yearly annuity  increase or decrease but never lower than the original payment..   The investments WRS makes or loses monies is from several different sources e.g. Stocks, Bonds, Equities, Fixed Income Investments & other investments such as rental properties and are how the "extra" monthly payments to retirees are figured and that they can take the "extra" money back by a system called "smoothing", and that's done both up & down over a 5 year period, never at once.

 Look at the online webinar at The Department of Employees Trust funds, "how rates and adjustments are determined" http://bit.ly/2SIrUAJ or contact ETF directly.

 A minus 3.3% will amount to about $30-$60 a month depending on how much the increased annuity payments are and only IF the retiree had ever received an increase. Drop in the Bucket.

That $60/month wouldn’t be a drop in the bucket under Obama. Nope. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ActionfigureJoe said:

That $60/month wouldn’t be a drop in the bucket under Obama. Nope. 

In the WRS system you are NOT entitled to any increase and the ONLY monies they can LEGALLY take back is the profit increase that a Retiree had received from WRS making monies from its investments, never your final adjusted annuity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, XCR1250 said:

In the WRS system you are NOT entitled to any increase and the ONLY monies they can LEGALLY take back is the profit increase that a Retiree had received from WRS making monies from its investments, never your final adjusted annuity.

I understand that. However, because the system is self funded, the board can make changes to monies paid in order to maintain the integrity of the system. String together a few years of these losses and you’ll see an adjustment. That’s the reality of a self funded system vs what Illinois has. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, ActionfigureJoe said:

I understand that. However, because the system is self funded, the board can make changes to monies paid in order to maintain the integrity of the system. String together a few years of these losses and you’ll see an adjustment. That’s the reality of a self funded system vs what Illinois has. 

They DO make yearly adjustments, up & down, always have..you will NEVER see an adjustment made to a retirees final annuity and that's the law..do you realize they have over 100 Billion $ in the Fund?

 Are you a retiree? Or still working? General employee, perhaps a Teacher or Law enforcement, Engineer, Technician, Campus Cop, DNR Game warden? If I may ask.

Edited by XCR1250
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
14 hours ago, XCR1250 said:

They DO make yearly adjustments, up & down, always have..you will NEVER see an adjustment made to a retirees final annuity and that's the law..do you realize they have over 100 Billion $ in the Fund?

 Are you a retiree? Or still working? General employee, perhaps a Teacher or Law enforcement, Engineer, Technician, Campus Cop, DNR Game warden? If I may ask.

He's a transformer.

He transforms junkies into drunks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, ActionfigureJoe said:

I’ve got about $450k in the fund. It’s not a ton, but it’s still a chunk. I’ve watched it grow at a nice steady clip since the 2008 crash. 2018 was the first year that it posted a loss. The yo-yo growth in the market is great for profit takers. I don’t see a big gain by year’s end. To much erratic messaging from this administration. 

Yup

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/22/2019 at 5:04 PM, ActionfigureJoe said:

I understand that. However, because the system is self funded, the board can make changes to monies paid in order to maintain the integrity of the system. String together a few years of these losses and you’ll see an adjustment. That’s the reality of a self funded system vs what Illinois has. 

Illinois is not what any pension should be modeled after. $250 billion in pension liabilities. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
30 minutes ago, Anler said:

Illinois is not what any pension should be modeled after. $250 billion in pension liabilities. 

If ya look at most states you will see as gross as that sounds , its the norm. ANd most are unfunded. It really is the next financial disaster waiting to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, steve from amherst said:

If ya look at most states you will see as gross as that sounds , its the norm. ANd most are unfunded. It really is the next financial disaster waiting to happen.

It’s all coming together nicely. The socialists are a starving man’s friend 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, steve from amherst said:

If ya look at most states you will see as gross as that sounds , its the norm. ANd most are unfunded. It really is the next financial disaster waiting to happen.

Yeah but this one only affects the pensioners. There just won't be any money to pay them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...