Major Trump administration climate report says damage is ‘intensifying across the country’

[revkevsdi]

1 minute ago, racer254 said:

Only the rich would drive.  LOL

You don't have anything to prove how much this would change climate.

Are you saying you don’t believe decreasing consumption of fossil fuels will slow climate change?

[Edmo]

5 minutes ago, revkevsdi said:

 

If the price of gas doubled, would people drive less?

When the gas prices first went up to 4 bucks a gal people were freaking out and I remember it was like you could roll up the streets after like 6 or 7 pm because nobody was out.

But people made adjustments to be more efficient, got used to it and life goes on.

[revkevsdi]

1 minute ago, Edmo said:

When the gas prices first went up to 4 bucks a gal people were freaking out and I remember it was like you could roll up the streets after like 6 or 7 pm because nobody was out.

But people made adjustments to be more efficient, got used to it and life goes on.

That’s what the tax does. Increases the cost of polluting so people make adjustments and pollute less. 

Polluting should not be free. 

[racer254]

Just now, revkevsdi said:

That’s what the tax does. Increases the cost of polluting so people make adjustments and pollute less. 

Polluting should not be free. 

Sure, only the rich should be allowed to pollute.

[Edmo]

1 minute ago, racer254 said:

Sure, only the rich should be allowed to pollute.

I would say there’s no doubt this disproportionately targets middle class and lower income folks. 

[revkevsdi]

Just now, racer254 said:

Sure, only the rich should be allowed to pollute.

The Koch brother became extremely wealthy polluting. They used that money to deny climate change. Exxon has known climate change for 40 years. They all spent that time convincing people like you that it isn’t real. Obviously it still works. 

Same shit the tobacco companies did. 

I bet there are still people on here that smoke, would smoke around their kids. 

That’s why it was called an inconvenient truth. 

 

[racer254]

Just now, Edmo said:

I would say there’s no doubt this disproportionately targets middle class and lower income folks. 

Of course, but look at how they have convinced at least one person here.

[Jimmy Snacks]

3 minutes ago, racer254 said:

Sure, only the rich should be allowed to pollute.

Hey there bonehead it's you and your ilk that want to gut the EPA.

[racer254]

Just now, revkevsdi said:

The Koch brother became extremely wealthy polluting. They used that money to deny climate change. Exxon has known climate change for 40 years. They all spent that time convincing people like you that it isn’t real. Obviously it still works. 

Same shit the tobacco companies did. 

I bet there are still people on here that smoke, would smoke around their kids. 

That’s why it was called an inconvenient truth. 

 

LOL.  We know who is being manipulated.  Just look at your thought process.

[Edmo]

1 minute ago, racer254 said:

Of course, but look at how they have convinced at least one person here.

Look at the droves of people leaving places like NY, Cali, and Illinois. There is a breaking point when you tax someone right out of there. 

[racer254]

1 minute ago, Edmo said:

Look at the droves of people leaving places like NY, Cali, and Illinois. There is a breaking point when you tax someone right out of there. 

Oh yeah, but all it takes is for some of these types who think this way to get into politics....then they feel it's their "duty" to control others all in the name of saving the planet...or other "good intentions"

'

[revkevsdi]

[racer254]

Ever see the effect the amount of corn grown in the US has on the climate?

[revkevsdi]

Just now, racer254 said:

Ever see the effect the amount of corn grown in the US has on the climate?

No. Tell us about it. 

[racer254]

Just now, revkevsdi said:

No. Tell us about it. 

Nope.  Go research it yourself.

[revkevsdi]

Just now, racer254 said:

Nope.  Go research it yourself.

Derp derp 

[racer254]

3 minutes ago, revkevsdi said:

Derp derp 

Science!!!

WCRP’s models take into account greenhouse gas emissions and other natural and humanmade influences, but do not consider agricultural land use. When researchers ran the numbers for the Corn Belt, the global models fell short of reality: They predicted both temperature and humidity to increase slightly, and rainfall to increase by up to 4%—none of which matches the observed changes.

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/02/america-s-corn-belt-making-its-own-weather

Edited November 25, 2018 by racer254

[revkevsdi]

7 minutes ago, racer254 said:

Science!!!

WCRP’s models take into account greenhouse gas emissions and other natural and humanmade influences, but do not consider agricultural land use. When researchers ran the numbers for the Corn Belt, the global models fell short of reality: They predicted both temperature and humidity to increase slightly, and rainfall to increase by up to 4%—none of which matches the observed changes.

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/02/america-s-corn-belt-making-its-own-weather

Do you believe in man made climate change?

Do you agree with the article?

Edited November 25, 2018 by revkevsdi

[racer254]

2 minutes ago, revkevsdi said:

Do you believe in man made climate change?

Do you agree with the article?

I believe that there is not one tax or monetary policy that will effect it.  Not to mention, they have no clue on what the climate will do.

[Rod]

The alt left is so anti science. The climate has always changed. Even if man ceased to exist tomorrow it would still continue warming. The minuscule amount that man “may” have contributed thus far is minuscule at best. That’s not what’s starting fires 

the alt left wouid rather bury their head in the sand and convulse “TAX THE RICH” than admit their policies were ill advised and adapt accordingly 

forest have always burned. It’s part of their cycle 

[revkevsdi]

5 minutes ago, racer254 said:

I believe that there is not one tax or monetary policy that will effect it.  Not to mention, they have no clue on what the climate will do.

You avoided both questions. 

You posted the article. 

[revkevsdi]

3 minutes ago, Rod Johnson said:

The alt left is so anti science. The climate has always changed. Even if man ceased to exist tomorrow it would still continue warming. The minuscule amount that man “may” have contributed thus far is minuscule at best. That’s not what’s starting fires 

the alt left wouid rather bury their head in the sand and convulse “TAX THE RICH” than admit their policies were ill advised and adapt accordingly 

forest have always burned. It’s part of their cycle 

The rich?  I thought they just finished arguing that it taxes the middle class and poor more. 

[Rod]

7 minutes ago, racer254 said:

I believe that there is not one tax or monetary policy that will effect it.  Not to mention, they have no clue on what the climate will do.

Yeah they’ve done studies and the amount that they would actually have to charge for a carbon tax to make a difference is so astronomical that it would break everyone RFN. Something like $3000/tonne

theres a reason here they want to tax carbon. We can’t stop using petroleum based fuels. They don’t want us to change, they just want the money. And $50/tonne is just where is starts. 

[Rod]

2 minutes ago, revkevsdi said:

The rich?  I thought they just finished arguing that it taxes the middle class and poor more. 

You seriously have zero constructed thoughts beyond talking points  

[revkevsdi]

1 minute ago, Rod Johnson said:

Yeah they’ve done studies and the amount that they would actually have to charge for a carbon tax to make a difference is so astronomical that it would break everyone RFN. Something like $3000/tonne

theres a reason here they want to tax carbon. We can’t stop using petroleum based fuels. They don’t want us to change, they just want the money. And $50/tonne is just where is starts. 

Link to your lies?