Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

SCOTUS Kennedy Retires


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said:

Well, if the shoe fits. You didn’t see it then when we all told you why we liked him. You didn’t see it then when I told you why Trump could win. And you know why? Because you are out of touch with middle America and the middle of the country. Sorry, but you just aren’t that bright.

Nailed it.  Slinger is dumb as a stump and completely out of touch with middle America.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said:

Oh didn’t you just see with Kennedy stepping down? Those are good to stay now too. 

That is what I’m referring too. Some thought the 2nd amendment as a whole has been at risk for awhile with the dems

Edited by Snoslinger
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only things that will be challenged with a new Trump appointee are Roe V Wade, and possibly Gay Marriage. 

Other than that, most of you will have nothing to worry about. 

I haven't read the entire thread. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will you guyz please STFU about Bernie Sanders???? He's not EVAh gonna' win the presidency!!!

GODDAMNIT, please STFU!!! 

He's an old crotchety Jew from New York, with socialist views, and an un-attractive wife. He's not a viable candidate. He got some stupid millenial kids to vote for him, and that was it. 

PLEASE STFU!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
9 hours ago, Snoslinger said:

Oh BS. I’d bet 95% of Bernie supporters still voted hillary, and those same supporters would vote for him again in 2020. If you had one smidgen of what Bernie stood for in you, you’d never have voted trump. Oil and water. But if it makes you feel a little better, by all means, carry on. You sound like a rww more everyday.

A lot of people I know who were Bernie supporters ended up not voting at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
4 hours ago, Polaris 550 said:

The only things that will be challenged with a new Trump appointee are Roe V Wade, and possibly Gay Marriage. 

Other than that, most of you will have nothing to worry about. 

I haven't read the entire thread. 

I don't believe R vs W is in jeopardy. The SC is very unlikely to reverse one of its own rulings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, steve from amherst said:

A lot of people I know who were Bernie supporters ended up not voting at all.

It tends to rub you the wrong way when you’re fave candidate gets railroaded by the party he is running for in favor of the “chosen one”. As much as they try to deny this it’s painfully obvious what happened. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
Just now, Edmo said:

It tends to rub you the wrong way when you’re fave candidate gets railroaded by the party he is running for in favor of the “chosen one”. As much as they try to deny this it’s painfully obvious what happened. 

My next door neighbor ( mid 40's) had never voted in his life. He was on the Bernie bandwagon . Come November he didn't vote.

My nephew ( mid 20's ) same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, steve from amherst said:

I don't believe R vs W is in jeopardy. The SC is very unlikely to reverse one of its own rulings.

The ruling this week overturned a 40 year precedent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, steve from amherst said:

A lot of people I know who were Bernie supporters ended up not voting at all.

that's a little different than turning round and voting for trump, proudly, and then defending him non-stop.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

that's a little different than turning round and voting for trump, proudly, and then defending him non-stop.

 

But muh principles!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This sounds like more winning to me...

“Pity the Democratic senators such as Joe Manchin III, W.Va., Heidi Heitkamp, N.D., Jon Tester, Mont., Claire McCaskill, Mo., and Joe Donnelly ,Ind., who are running for reelection in states Trump won by double digits. Their political survival depends on being perceived as centrists, and they will now have to spend months campaigning while caught in the crossfire of a liberal-conservative battle royal over a Trump-nominated Supreme Court justice. Vote yes, and their liberal base will be apoplectic; vote no, and their pro-Trump constituents could revolt.

For all these reasons, Trump's appointee is likely to be confirmed. If that happens, Trump will have led one of the most consequential conservative presidencies in modern American history. Not only is Trump expanding the conservative Supreme Court majority, he is also moving at record pace to fill the federal appeals courts with young conservative judges who will preside for decades. Imagine if it were Clinton making all these appointments. The consequences for human life, religious liberty, the Second Amendment and limited government would have been disastrous.”

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Edmo said:

This sounds like more winning to me...

“Pity the Democratic senators such as Joe Manchin III, W.Va., Heidi Heitkamp, N.D., Jon Tester, Mont., Claire McCaskill, Mo., and Joe Donnelly ,Ind., who are running for reelection in states Trump won by double digits. Their political survival depends on being perceived as centrists, and they will now have to spend months campaigning while caught in the crossfire of a liberal-conservative battle royal over a Trump-nominated Supreme Court justice. Vote yes, and their liberal base will be apoplectic; vote no, and their pro-Trump constituents could revolt.

For all these reasons, Trump's appointee is likely to be confirmed. If that happens, Trump will have led one of the most consequential conservative presidencies in modern American history. Not only is Trump expanding the conservative Supreme Court majority, he is also moving at record pace to fill the federal appeals courts with young conservative judges who will preside for decades. Imagine if it were Clinton making all these appointments. The consequences for human life, religious liberty, the Second Amendment and limited government would have been disastrous.”

 

Bwahahahahahaha.  More winning.  Poor slinger.  :lol2: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...