Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

MOTO I MADE YOU A MEME OUT OF FRIENDSHIP


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, DriftBusta said:

i suppose saying faggot or nigger pile in jest qualifies me as a white supremacist hater, but saying all cops should be killed is perfectly within the bounds of civilized and acceptable societal banter.  you really are for real.  shut the fuck up already.  

don't forget his sig.. :pc:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jimmy Snacks said:

STFU...Your schtick is old and lame.

Sounds like you are the one that is afraid.

Yeah, I'm afraid of this place becoming a digital klan hood. 

You know why the klan wears hoods, Jim? It's because after they're done burning crosses and hating on minorities together, they go back to being your home town doctors, lawyers, hardware store owners, bankers, etc. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, motonoggin said:

Yeah, I'm afraid of this place becoming a digital klan hood. 

You know why the klan wears hoods, Jim? It's because after they're done burning crosses and hating on minorities together, they go back to being your home town doctors, lawyers, hardware store owners, bankers, etc. 

 

LMAO

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, motonoggin said:

Yeah, I'm afraid of this place becoming a digital klan hood. 

You know why the klan wears hoods, Jim? It's because after they're done burning crosses and hating on minorities together, they go back to being your home town doctors, lawyers, hardware store owners, bankers, etc. 

 

What’s more gross to you that this isn’t a man or that she’s white or both 

4A8DAD2D-8FC7-4F73-9299-C5EBFEE985DA.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
6 minutes ago, motonoggin said:

Yeah, I'm afraid of this place becoming a digital klan hood. 

You know why the klan wears hoods, Jim? It's because after they're done burning crosses and hating on minorities together, they go back to being your home town doctors, lawyers, hardware store owners, bankers, etc. 

 

You are cracked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jimmy Snacks said:

You are cracked.

Am I?

BBIPOC have been saying for a long time that when white people aren't in mixed company they'll be racist as fuck. All nice to their face, but the minute they leave the room, all the hoods go back on.

This conduct is a perfect example of that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, motonoggin said:

Am I?

BBIPOC have been saying for a long time that when white people aren't in mixed company they'll be racist as fuck. All nice to their face, but the minute they leave the room, all the hoods go back on.

This conduct is a perfect example of that. 

Not really you people just keep changing the definition of racism to keep your agenda alive 

I doubt anyone here actually hates people solely because of their race or skin colour like you do

no place for SJW’s if everything is fine 

Edited by Rod Johnson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rod Johnson said:

Not really you people just keep changing the definition of racism to keep your agenda alive 

I doubt anyone here actually hates people solely because of their race or skin colour like you do

no place for SJW’s if everything is fine 

Right, because open and repeated use of racial slurs isn't racist. :lol:

How far does this "tolerance for intolerance" go before it becomes toxic and destructive? 

If someone admits to painting swastikas on their Mexican neighbor's house, should they be outed? Or would that violate your precious forum rules that our resident klan members abuse in order to hide their faces? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, motonoggin said:

Right, because open and repeated use of racial slurs isn't racist. :lol:

How far does this "tolerance for intolerance" go before it becomes toxic and destructive? 

If someone admits to painting swastikas on their Mexican neighbor's house, should they be outed? Or would that violate your precious forum rules that our resident klan members abuse in order to hide their faces? 

It’s humour. Which is what the left doesn’t have and subsequently why they can’t meme. If you find it in bad taste ignore it 

youre going down a bad path and here’s why. You are demanding that people conform their speech and humour to your wishes because you don’t like it, essentially being an authoritarian fascist.

the problem is that you betas are pushing weight around that you don’t have. It will eventually end in disaster for you guys because you’re literally weaklings. This is apparent in certain aspects like how words cut you right to the core. 

Free speech is paramount because speech is the only way we can help and alter each other’s behaviour besides the physical. And the physical is where you lose.

just because you hear some speech that goes against your niggerfaggot talking points doesn’t mean you need to have a hissy fit about it. It’s only words. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not funny to reenforce harm to oppressed groups. That's what you all are doing by continuing to use and normalize slurs.

If you think it's funny that your use of words will result in increased harm to oppressed groups, then you're a fascist. You don't defeat fascism in reasoned debate and zealous protection of their genocidal ideas. That only spreads it. You defeat it by making fascists afraid to speak. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, motonoggin said:

It's not funny to reenforce harm to oppressed groups. That's what you all are doing by continuing to use and normalize slurs.

If you think it's funny that your use of words will result in increased harm to oppressed groups, then you're a fascist. You don't defeat fascism in reasoned debate and zealous protection of their genocidal ideas. That only spreads it. You defeat it by making fascists afraid to speak. 

 

But you will lose because you people are very weak and feminine. That’s the problem. You are talking about using oppression to combat oppression and that never works. 

Having a laugh at a string of words isn’t oppressing. It’s just humour. Demanding that people conform to your wishes because word make you sad is oppression though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rod Johnson said:

But you will lose because you people are very weak and feminine. That’s the problem. You are talking about using oppression to combat oppression and that never works. 

Having a laugh at a string of words isn’t oppressing. It’s just humour. Demanding that people conform to your wishes because word make you sad is oppression though. 

Yeah, I mean, I guess it could be considered oppression that we demand people be decent fucking humans and cognizant of the effects of their actions on others if they want their ideas heard.

Apparently that's too much to ask for some and obviously oppressive. 

Edited by motonoggin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, motonoggin said:

Yeah, I mean, I guess it could be considered oppression that we demand people be decent fucking humans and cognizant of the effects of their actions on others if they want their ideas heard.

Apparently that's too much to ask for some.  

Most people are decent human beings. Except the fringe left like you.. you guys are the biggest fucking retards that are so twisted and contorted over minutia when the macro of racial tensions belong to the left anyway 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Rod Johnson said:

Most people are decent human beings. Except the fringe left like you.. you guys are the biggest fucking retards that are so twisted and contorted over minutia when the macro of racial tensions belong to the left anyway 

White people who think racial and homophobic slurs are funny aren't decent people. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, motonoggin said:

White people who think racial and homophobic slurs are funny aren't decent people. 

 

According to you, but you’re an authoritarian fascist so your point is moot 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know what Moto, Roddy has got you dead to rights here.

You are a “radical” and as such, you aren’t allowed to listen to views that are different than yours.  Just keep in mind, it also makes your voice silent in any ears other than your fellow radicals.

You are wrong on all of your assumptions on race because this isn’t the 1940’s anymore.

You are wrong on your fascist statements because...this isn’t the 1940’s anymore.

You are wrong on your Socialism statements because, well, again, this isn’t the 1940’s anymore.  We all know better now.

I always appreciated your style but your melt down this week has got me a bit put-off by your brand of insanity.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

You know what Moto, Roddy has got you dead to rights here.

You are a “radical” and as such, you aren’t allowed to listen to views that are different than yours.  Just keep in mind, it also makes your voice silent in any ears other than your fellow radicals.

You are wrong on all of your assumptions on race because this isn’t the 1940’s anymore.

You are wrong on your fascist statements because...this isn’t the 1940’s anymore.

You are wrong on your Socialism statements because, well, again, this isn’t the 1940’s anymore.  We all know better now.

I always appreciated your style but your melt down this week has got me a bit put-off by your brand of insanity.

 

The lefts group identity politics is extremely divisive and can be very racist. I’d say that most if not all of the “right” just wants everyone equally treated under the law and otherwise. And we need to realize that equal opportunity does not mean equal outcome and you can’t have equal outcome with equal opportunity. The leftist ideals are always systematically racist or sexist because you can’t have equality of outcome without it. Equality of outcome always puts group identity first and merit later. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Rod Johnson said:

The lefts group identity politics is extremely divisive and can be very racist. I’d say that most if not all of the “right” just wants everyone equally treated under the law and otherwise. And we need to realize that equal opportunity does not mean equal outcome and you can’t have equal outcome with equal opportunity. The leftist ideals are always systematically racist or sexist because you can’t have equality of outcome without it. Equality of outcome always puts group identity first and merit later. 

What a load of liberal bullshit. :lol:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...