Snoslinger Posted March 13, 2018 Share Posted March 13, 2018 4 minutes ago, racer254 said: So, what happens if Mueller's "has teeth"? Impeachment? Even though you claim the senate and house are partisan? LOL hopefully that and jail Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted March 13, 2018 Share Posted March 13, 2018 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: hopefully that and jail LOL. How long will this take? Then what? We get another partisan politician in office? WOO HOO. Way to go dipshit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 13, 2018 Share Posted March 13, 2018 4 minutes ago, racer254 said: LOL. How long will this take? Then what? We get another partisan politician in office? WOO HOO. Way to go dipshit. why in the fuck are you so hung up on how much time this is taking? in the overall scheme of things this is not out of the ordinary. at your "then what" statement. just let all this go huh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franks pond Posted March 13, 2018 Share Posted March 13, 2018 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted March 13, 2018 Author Share Posted March 13, 2018 1 hour ago, Snoslinger said: Your boy MC beat you to DU this morning oops Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 13, 2018 Share Posted March 13, 2018 5 minutes ago, Rod Johnson said: Your boy MC beat you to DU this morning oops it's so funny, and accurate, it needed repeating. btw... thank you mueller! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted March 13, 2018 Share Posted March 13, 2018 1 hour ago, Snoslinger said: why in the fuck are you so hung up on how much time this is taking? in the overall scheme of things this is not out of the ordinary. at your "then what" statement. just let all this go huh? Well if it was so obvious(collusion)..like you seem to think it is....why cant these professional investigators find anything? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 13, 2018 Share Posted March 13, 2018 7 minutes ago, DAVE said: Well if it was so obvious(collusion)..like you seem to think it is....why cant these professional investigators find anything? get your memory checked Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted March 13, 2018 Share Posted March 13, 2018 5 minutes ago, DAVE said: Well if it was so obvious(collusion)..like you seem to think it is....why cant these professional investigators find anything? Who says they can’t? Collusion would be great but I think America willl settle for lying under oath about an affair with a porn star. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 13, 2018 Share Posted March 13, 2018 5 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said: Who says they can’t? Collusion would be great but I think America willl settle for lying under oath about an affair with a porn star. he's had all this explained to him plenty of times yet he keeps coming back with the same dumb questions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted March 13, 2018 Author Share Posted March 13, 2018 16 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: it's so funny, and accurate, it needed repeating. btw... thank you mueller! Except the investigations are showing otherwise oops Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted March 13, 2018 Author Share Posted March 13, 2018 8 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said: Who says they can’t? Collusion would be great but I think America willl settle for lying under oath about an affair with a porn star. Except America elected him oops Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted March 13, 2018 Share Posted March 13, 2018 14 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said: Who says they can’t? Collusion would be great but I think America willl settle for lying under oath about an affair with a porn star. Sounds familiar....wouldnt it mean more if he was actually not a private citizen at the time? 11 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: he's had all this explained to him plenty of times yet he keeps coming back with the same dumb questions. You wrote the book on dumb one would think.....youve been blabbering for a yr + now about collusion....but now you are settling with whether Trump banged a porn star or not... Can you not see how pathetic that makes you look? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted March 13, 2018 Author Share Posted March 13, 2018 (edited) 16 minutes ago, DAVE said: Well if it was so obvious(collusion)..like you seem to think it is....why cant these professional investigators find anything? They haven’t adopted slingers new supersleuth techniques yet! Edited March 13, 2018 by Rod Johnson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted March 13, 2018 Share Posted March 13, 2018 39 minutes ago, DAVE said: Sounds familiar....wouldnt it mean more if he was actually not a private citizen at the time? You wrote the book on dumb one would think.....youve been blabbering for a yr + now about collusion....but now you are settling with whether Trump banged a porn star or not... Can you not see how pathetic that makes you look? I really don’t think there’s a difference as far as the law is concerned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted March 13, 2018 Share Posted March 13, 2018 3 hours ago, ICEMAN! said: Who says they can’t? Collusion would be great but I think America willl settle for lying under oath about an affair with a porn star. When did Donny lie under oath about an affair with a porn star?. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted March 13, 2018 Share Posted March 13, 2018 1 hour ago, AKIQPilot said: When did Donny lie under oath about an affair with a porn star?. It’s quite possible he would if given the chance. It was a hypothetical, not a statement of fact. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member steve from amherst Posted March 14, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 14, 2018 1 hour ago, AKIQPilot said: When did Donny lie under oath about an affair with a porn star?. Same reason slick Willy did. Its what married dudes do Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted March 14, 2018 Author Share Posted March 14, 2018 30 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said: It’s quite possible he would if given the chance. It was a hypothetical, not a statement of fact. This is getting beyond desperate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 2 minutes ago, Rod Johnson said: This is getting beyond desperate So much so, it’s literally not making any sense at all anymore. Bizarre. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 47 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said: It’s quite possible he would if given the chance. It was a hypothetical, not a statement of fact. anyone with any god damn sense, and current events awareness, would know that. my god i'm embarrassed by some of my fellow americans. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 1 hour ago, ICEMAN! said: It’s quite possible he would if given the chance. It was a hypothetical, not a statement of fact. Everything is hypothetical....lots of what ifs.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 15 minutes ago, DAVE said: Everything is hypothetical....lots of what ifs.... Its absolutely all they have. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 whaaat? Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., on Tuesday contradicted his own GOP-led committee's findings in its probe of Russian meddling during the 2016 U.S. election. In a statement, Gowdy said it was "clear, based on the evidence, Russia had disdain for Secretary Clinton and was motivated in whole or in part by a desire to harm her candidacy or undermine her Presidency had she prevailed." The statement from Gowdy, who is not seeking re-election at the end of his current term, cuts against conclusions announced Monday by the Republican-led House Intelligence Committee. -snip-Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/13/gop-rep-gowdy-says-russia-hurt-hillary-clinton-campaign.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted March 14, 2018 Share Posted March 14, 2018 5 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: whaaat? Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., on Tuesday contradicted his own GOP-led committee's findings in its probe of Russian meddling during the 2016 U.S. election. In a statement, Gowdy said it was "clear, based on the evidence, Russia had disdain for Secretary Clinton and was motivated in whole or in part by a desire to harm her candidacy or undermine her Presidency had she prevailed." The statement from Gowdy, who is not seeking re-election at the end of his current term, cuts against conclusions announced Monday by the Republican-led House Intelligence Committee. -snip-Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/13/gop-rep-gowdy-says-russia-hurt-hillary-clinton-campaign.html So what does this have to do with Mueller announcing there was no collusion? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.