Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Trump wants new authority over polling places. Top election officials say no


Recommended Posts

WASHINGTON — President Trump would be able to dispatch Secret Service agents to polling places nationwide during a federal election, a vast expansion of executive authority, if a provision in a Homeland Security reauthorization bill remains intact.

The rider has prompted outrage from more than a dozen top elections officials around the country, including Secretary of State William F. Galvin of Massachusetts, a Democrat, who says he is worried that it could be used to intimidate voters and said there is “no basis” for providing Trump with this new authority.

“This is worthy of a Third World country,” said Galvin in an interview. “I’m not going to tolerate people showing up to our polling places. I would not want to have federal agents showing up in largely Hispanic areas.”

“The potential for mischief here is enormous,” Galvin added.

The provision alarming him and others is a rider attached to legislation that would re-authorize the Department of Homeland Security. The legislation already cleared the House of Representatives with bipartisan support.

The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs didn’t include the measure in the version of the bill it approved this week, according to Ben Voelkel, a spokesman for Senator Ron Johnson, who chairs the Senate committee.

The full Senate must still approve the bill, and then the two versions of the legislation would need to be reconciled before going to the president for approval.

The White House didn’t respond to a question about the measure.

“There is no discernible need for federal secret service agents to intrude, at the direction of the president, who may also be a candidate in that election, into thousands of citadels where democracy is enshrined,” according to a letter opposing the provision that was signed by 19 bipartisan secretaries of state and elections commissioners.

The letter — sent to the Senate’s majority leader, Mitch McConnell, and its minority leader, Charles Schumer, on Friday afternoon —requests that the Senate keep the Secret Service provision from the final legislation. The elections officials described the proposal as “unprecedented and shocking.”

“This is an alarming proposal which raises the possibility that armed federal agents will be patrolling neighborhood precincts and vote centers,” according to the letter, which was obtained by the Globe.

Trump has accused Massachusetts residents of illegally casting ballots in New Hampshire as a part of a vast voter fraud scheme he believes cost him the Granite State’s electorial college votes during the 2016 general election. Hillary Clinton narrowly won New Hampshire’s four electoral college points.

No evidence has been found that such voter fraud occurred, with elections officials in both New Hampshire and Massachusetts saying there were no widespread irregularities.

Trump has also said that illegal ballots cast in other parts of the country cost him the popular vote, which he lost by nearly 3 million ballots. There has also been no evidence that nearly so many votes were cast improperly.

But Trump used that accusation as a reason to launch a commission on voter fraud through which he sought personal voter information from every state. The commission dissolved in January after many states refused to comply with the federal request and amid multiple lawsuits.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2018/03/09/top-elections-officials-raise-alarm-over-allowing-trump-new-authority-over-polling-places/qvdmfTe7N7AFZXl0k4CwEO/story.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, oleroule said:

well, if the black panthers can do it....

One YouTube video and it's a nationwide crisis! Fuck man i grew up in and around Chicago and every polling station I've ever been was very professional and on the up and up. Its pretty serious with representatives from both parties usually present. If there was concern I think it would be with the electronic voting. If those can be hacked that is a problem. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

way to go, you blew snakey's load for him :lol:

 

not trying to ruin anything but, elections are a states' and congressional issue, not the executive.

Edited by oleroule
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mainecat said:

NH requires ID and they also cross off your name that you voted. Paper ballots go in the large counter machines face down.

Same here and same when i lived in illinois.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mainecat said:

NH requires ID and they also cross off your name that you voted. Paper ballots go in the large counter machines face down.

no id here. they ask your address, check your name off a list, hand you a paper ballot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member

How about an end to hi tech gerrymandering......let the voters pick the politicians not the politicians pick the voters...:snack: 

Edited by SnowRider
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SnowRider said:

How about an end to hi tech gerrymandering......let the voters pick the politicians not the politicians pick the voters...:snack: 

Gerry mandering is a big problem. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
1 hour ago, SnowRider said:

How about an end to hi tech gerrymandering......let the voters pick the politicians not the politicians pick the voters...:snack: 

Why would it matter . most of your party picked Bernie. Then the superdelagates told you people you were too stupid to make important decisions so they would do it for you. 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mainecat said:

NH requires ID and they also cross off your name that you voted. Paper ballots go in the large counter machines face down.

yeah they do the same shit in MN .funny shit still happens like when Franken looks  like he is loosing they just happen to find 3 boxes of uncounted ballets in the trunk of a car that were 90% for old Al.

  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SnowRider said:

How about an end to hi tech gerrymandering......let the voters pick the politicians not the politicians pick the voters...:snack: 

so you are saying you are upset the DNC stuck there dick well Hillary's strap on any way  in your ass last yr?

Edited by Ez ryder
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mainecat said:

NH requires ID and they also cross off your name that you voted. Paper ballots go in the large counter machines face down.

so are you saying if you have no photo id you can  not vote ? think hard before inserting foot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
5 minutes ago, Ez ryder said:

so are you saying if you have no photo id you can  not vote ? think hard before inserting foot

You have to sign an affidavit stating who you are and where you live. Then you vote , get in your car and drive back home to Massachusetts. They then send a postcard to your buddy who's address you used . He mails it to you. You fill it out and mail it back. As easy as it is to do that , thousands still never get mailed back. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...