Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Why Trump's White House is embroiled in a hiring crisis


Recommended Posts

Why Trump's White House is embroiled in a hiring crisis

Donald TrumpDonald Trump.Alex Wong/Getty Images

 

President Trump has yet to nominate anyone for 74% of key executive branch positions. Out of the 558 positions which require Senate confirmation, 415 have no nominee as of Sunday.

Seven people have been announced as nominees but not formally nominated.

But the Trump administration's lag in selecting nominees may not be the only thing to blame for the White House's hiring crisis. Of the 94 formal nominees, the Senate has confirmed only 42 so far.

A number of factors besides the lack of nominees have also contributed to the delay, including: Democrats' opposition to Trump's nominees, some Republicans' unwillingness to work for an administration rocked by controversy, and Trump's reported treatment of administration officials.

Here's a guide to the reasons:

View As: One Page Slides

 

Trump's nominees have had to wait far longer than Obama's, Bush's, and Clinton's.

According to The Washington Post, Trump's Cabinet nominees had to wait 25 days between being officially nominated and being voted on by the Senate. On the other hand, President Barack Obama's nominees had a median wait time of two days, President George W. Bush's waited zero days, and President Bill Clinton's waited one day.

A number of Trump's nominees faced a steep uphill climb during their confirmation hearings. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and Attorney General Jeff Sessions faced particularly sharp questioning from congressional Democrats for their past conduct, and Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos' nomination nearly failed after two Republican senators voted against her, leading to a 50-50 stalemate. In the end, Vice President Mike Pence had to cast the tie-breaking vote to confirm DeVos.

Sources: The Washington PostBusiness Insider

Some Republicans are wary of joining the Trump administration amid the brewing Russia controversy.

Recent news stories suggesting that the congressional and FBI investigations may now reach some top White House officials may deter potential nominees from joining the administration, Politico reported in May.

The Trump-Russia story has gained even more steam since then, following Trump's abrupt decision to fire FBI director James Comey, a slew of media reports that raised questions about the president's and his associates' ties to Russia, and Comey's bombshell testimony before the Senate earlier this month.

A number of potential nominees are having second thoughts as the continuing investigations threaten to derail Trump's agenda, four people close to prospective nominees told Politico. Others echoed similar sentiments to The Washington Post in a story published Saturday.

An attorney who represents potential executive branch nominees also told Politico that three clients said they were not interested in working for Trump after former FBI director Robert Mueller was appointed as a special prosecutor to spearhead the FBI's Russia probe.

"There's no doubt in my mind that people are being very cautious, to put it mildly," the attorney said. If people continue to drop out from consideration, "you're going to have a situation where they're going to have trouble getting A-list of even B-list people to sign up," the lawyer added.

Sources: Business InsiderPoliticoThe Washington Post

Trump's treatment of current administration officials may be deterring potential appointees.

The Post reported that some potential nominees are aware of Trump's reported mood swings and frequent irritation toward senior staff and Cabinet members. 

"Trump is becoming radioactive, and it's accelerating," Bill Valdez, a former senior Energy Department official, told the Post. "He just threw Jeff Sessions under the bus."

Valdez was likely referring to reports that Trump is angry with Sessions for recusing himself from the Russia probe. Sessions reportedly offered to resign over the tiff.

Trump has also frequently made statements that directly contradicted those his communications staff and spokespeople have made. This was perhaps most prominent in the immediate aftermath of Comey's firing.

The White House and Trump's spokespeople initially said that Trump's decision to remove the FBI director was based entirely on the recommendation of Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and had nothing to do with the escalating Russia controversy.

Shortly after, however, Trump told NBC's Lester Holt that he had already made the decision to fire Comey and was going to do it regardless of Rosenstein's recommendation. He also added that "this Russia thing" was a factor in his decision.

"If you're working with a boss who doesn't have your back," Valdez told the Post, "you have no confidence in working with that individual."

Sources: The Washington PostBusiness Insider

http://www.businessinsider.com/why-trump-white-house-in-hiring-crisis-positions-unfilled-2017-6/#trumps-treatment-of-current-administration-officials-may-be-deterring-potential-appointees-3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to wonder if all these positions are really needed.  558 government positions?  Seems like a lot of positions for a new administration.  maybe we should rethink the need for all these teat suckers.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol:

Another fantastical opinion "hit piece" by Trump hater/blogger Sonam Sheth using WAPO as a source! :lol:

 ".....embroiled in a hiring crisis"!!!!!

Well done Ice....and remember, if you believe it, and it makes you feel validated...IT MUST BE TRUE!!!!!!!!

 

 

14 minutes ago, AKIQPilot said:

I have to wonder if all these positions are really needed.  558 government positions?  Seems like a lot of positions for a new administration.  maybe we should rethink the need for all these teat suckers.  

Yep.  Lot's of tripling and quadrupling up on a position easily done by one person.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

:lol:

Another fantastical opinion "hit piece" by Trump hater/blogger Sonam Sheth using WAPO as a source! :lol:

 ".....embroiled in a hiring crisis"!!!!!

Well done Ice....and remember, if you believe it, and it makes you feel validated...IT MUST BE TRUE!!!!!!!!

 

 

Yep.  Lot's of tripling and quadrupling up on a position easily done by one person.

 

 

 

So all those positions have been filled then!

Cool, post up the names

:lmao:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, AKIQPilot said:

I have to wonder if all these positions are really needed.  558 government positions?  Seems like a lot of positions for a new administration.  maybe we should rethink the need for all these teat suckers.  

Yea, just hire Jared to fill all of those positions

:lol:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said:

"Trump is becoming radioactive, and it's accelerating," Bill Valdez, a former senior Energy Department official, told the Post. "He just threw Jeff Sessions under the bus."

#winning

:lol:

 

I find it weird he didn't have anything good to say about Tump....but wait...Let's play "CONSIDER THE SOURCE" (and not just WAPO)

"Bill Valdez". 

President of SEA, (the fourth in a year) stumping for Obama and guess who else.....

Big government advocate

Also serves as a professor at American University.  One of the top ranked liberal universities in America.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

I find it weird he didn't have anything good to say about Tump....but wait...Let's play "CONSIDER THE SOURCE" (and not just WAPO)

"Bill Valdez". 

President of SEA, (the fourth in a year) stumping for Obama and guess who else.....

Big government advocate

Also serves as a professor at American University.  One of the top ranked liberal universities in America.

Oh noes! The man said something bad about Donnie Moscow!

 

IMG_7417.GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ICEMAN! said:

Oh noes! The man said something bad about Donnie Moscow!

 

IMG_7417.GIF

Don't care....but why do you feel it somehow adds credibility to your weak argument through another liberal hack source?  Ahhh......."VALIIDATE ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AKIQPilot said:

I have to wonder if all these positions are really needed.  558 government positions?  Seems like a lot of positions for a new administration.  maybe we should rethink the need for all these teat suckers.  

Yup and Trump has said as much a bunch of redundant tit sucking hacks are not needed :guzzle:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

Don't care....but why do you feel it somehow adds credibility to your weak argument through another liberal hack source?  Ahhh......."VALIIDATE ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

Why doesn't anyone want to work for Trump, or if they do, why can't he even accomplish something as small as filling these positions?

#failing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said:

Why doesn't anyone want to work for Trump, or if they do, why can't he even accomplish something as small as filling these positions?

#failing

Just stop.  I can feel you butt-hurt through my screen now.   Feels like hatred, self loathing, shame and ignorance.  The cornerstones of a good liberal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Zambroski said:

Just stop.  I can feel you butt-hurt through my screen now.   Feels like hatred, self loathing, shame and ignorance.  The cornerstones of a good liberal.

Nice deflection, awwww not really.  It sucks shit and was expected.

 

IMG_7418.GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ICEMAN! said:

Nice deflection, awwww not really.  It sucks shit and was expected.

 

 

It's not a deflection.  Your questions were stupid.  I assumed they were at least somewhat rhetorical...or are you that stupid?  

Sorry that Comey thing didn't work out for you all.  So is this now called "Position-Fill Gate"?  How stupid.   :lol:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Zambroski said:

It's not a deflection.  Your questions were stupid.  I assumed they were at least somewhat rhetorical...or are you that stupid?  

Sorry that Comey thing didn't work out for you all.  So is this now called "Position-Fill Gate"?  How stupid.   :lol:

 

:lol: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

It's not a deflection.  Your questions were stupid.  I assumed they were at least somewhat rhetorical...or are you that stupid?  

Sorry that Comey thing didn't work out for you all.  So is this now called "Position-Fill Gate"?  How stupid.   :lol:

 

If only you clowns held Trump to a fraction of the standards you demanded of the Obama administration, but nope...

:lmao:

 

IMG_7416.GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol



×
×
  • Create New...