jtssrx Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 (edited) is there anything, anything you don't dive in head first over, jtssrx? Twitter said in a tweet on Thursday. "We want to explain that her account was temporarily locked because one of her Tweets included a private phone number, which violates of our Terms of Service." Edited October 12, 2017 by Snoslinger 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member Kivalo Posted October 12, 2017 Gold Member Share Posted October 12, 2017 WGAF, getting suspended on twitter is kike being asked to leave a restaurant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 this is the kind of shit assange spreads around, to get the bens, noggins, jttsrxs all riled up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 Oops, jt slipped on that banana peel! Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted October 12, 2017 Author Share Posted October 12, 2017 20 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: is there anything, anything you don't dive in head first over, jtssrx? Twitter said in a tweet on Thursday. "We want to explain that her account was temporarily locked because one of her Tweets included a private phone number, which violates of our Terms of Service." tell Julian Assange dipshit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T1R9sledder Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 25 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: is there anything, anything you don't dive in head first over, jtssrx? Twitter said in a tweet on Thursday. "We want to explain that her account was temporarily locked because one of her Tweets included a private phone number, which violates of our Terms of Service." At Jamie Lee Curtis's remarks...... https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/12/arts/rose-mcgowan-twitter-weinstein.html Rose McGowan’s Twitter Account Locked After Posts About Weinstein By NELLIE BOWLES and CARA BUCKLEYOCT. 12, 2017 Continue reading the main storyShare This Page Share Tweet Pin Email More Save Photo Rose McGowan in 2015. “TWITTER HAS SUSPENDED ME. THERE ARE POWERFUL FORCES AT WORK. BE MY VOICE,” she wrote on her Instagram page. CreditAn Rong Xu for The New York Times The actress Rose McGowan said in an Instagram post overnight that her Twitter account had been temporarily locked following a series of posts about Harvey Weinstein’s misconduct, including toward her. “TWITTER HAS SUSPENDED ME. THERE ARE POWERFUL FORCES AT WORK. BE MY VOICE,” Ms. McGowan wrote on her Instagram page after midnight Eastern time on Thursday. She included a snapshot of a message from Twitter saying she would only be able to send direct messages from her account unless she deleted tweets that violated Twitter rules. The screenshot announced a temporary freeze that prevented her from tweeting, retweeting or liking for 12 hours. Unlike a full suspension, this measure leaves her account visible. The message in the screenshot said that the lock was in effect because Ms. McGowan’s account had “violated the Twitter rules.” Continue reading the main story RELATED COVERAGE Weinstein Company Was Aware of Payouts in 2015 OCT. 11, 2017 CRITIC’S NOTEBOOK Harvey Weinstein Is Gone. But Hollywood Still Has a Problem. OCT. 11, 2017 Opinion Bret Stephens Weinstein and Our Culture of EnablersOCT. 11, 2017 ADVERTISEMENT Continue reading the main story In a statement, a Twitter representative wrote that Ms. McGowan’s tweets violated the company’s privacy policy because one of them included a phone number. A person familiar with the decision said that the phone number of a prominent person was visible in a screenshot of an email. The statement said: “We want to explain that her account was temporarily locked because one of her tweets included a private phone number, which violates our Terms of Service. The tweet was removed and her account has been unlocked. We will be clearer about these policies and decisions in the future.” Twitter can and often does take down individual tweets, rather than suspend entire accounts. It is unclear why the company froze Ms. McGowan’s entire account. A person familiar with the decision said that in part it happened because of timing: The key decision makers at Twitter, based in San Francisco, were out of the office when the account was locked overnight. When the workday started, Twitter’s executives decided to lift the account’s 12-hour freeze several hours early. Ms. McGowan reached a $100,000 settlement with Mr. Weinstein in 1997 following a hotel room incident at the Sundance Film Festival, and in recent days has been vocal in her support of women who have stepped forward to reveal that the producer had sexually harassed them or worse. On Tuesday, after the actor Ben Affleck tweeted that the allegations against Mr. Weinstein “made him sick,” Ms. McGowan called him a liar, saying he had long been aware of what Mr. Weinstein had done. She has also attacked Hollywood players who failed to criticize Mr. Weinstein, writing in a tweet, “you all knew.” Many Twitter users expressed outrage over Ms. McGowan’s account being locked. The actress Jessica Chastain asked for clarification on which rules Ms. McGowan violated, adding, “Asking for multiple victims of sexual violence.” Follow Jessica Chastain ✔@jes_chastain Hey @Twitter let us know which of these rules @rosemcgowanbroke. Asking for multiple victims of sexual violence. https://support.twitter.com/articles/18311 8:21 AM - Oct 12, 2017 The Twitter Rules We believe that everyone should have the power to create and share ideas and information instantly, without barriers. In order to protect the experience and safety of people who use Twitter, support.twitter.com 268268 Replies 5,3835,383 Retweets 12,04112,041 likes Twitter Ads info and privacy The actress Jamie Lee Curtis wrote: “And now THIS? You allow Twitter freedom to our president but you silence a woman speaking out about sexual harassment?” Jack Dorsey, Twitter’s chief executive, wrote that the company needs to be “a lot more transparent” to build trust. Twitter has previously stated that tweets that are “newsworthy” remain on the site even if they violate its terms of service rules. In recent months, many have asked why President Trump’s account hasn’t been suspended despite seeming to threaten other countries with violence. Threats of violence are not allowed on the platform, according to the Twitter Rules, a set of behavioral guidelines for users that include a prohibition against “harassment” and “hateful conduct.” The company wrote that Twitter would not suspend Mr. Trump in part because of “newsworthiness.” The company is now under increased scrutiny after revelations that it allowed hundreds of Russian-linked accounts to flourish on the site. The Russian-linked accounts seemed intent on inciting partisan furor and electing Mr. Trump. Twitter has been long criticized for taking too laissez-faire an approach to monitoring content that many of its users see to be in violation of the terms of service and Twitter Rules. Some prominent users have claimed the site is a hostile space for women. The harassment campaign known as Gamergate flourished on the site for years, and when the company does suspend or ban an account it is often after immense pressure from users. Follow Cara Buckley on Twitter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted October 12, 2017 Author Share Posted October 12, 2017 Maybe the libtards on this board should do what they do best, complete avoid these kinds of topics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtralettucetomatoe580 Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 3 minutes ago, jtssrx said: Maybe the libtards on this board should do what they do best, complete avoid these kinds of topics. Maybe you should do research and not be such a spoon fed moron who believes everything he finds on YouTube? Food for thought. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bussman Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 I have never used Twitter. I take it she posted an image containing a phone number? Ben Affleck sure sounds like a two faced lying prick though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted October 12, 2017 Author Share Posted October 12, 2017 9 minutes ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said: Maybe you should do research and not be such a spoon fed moron who believes everything he finds on YouTube? Food for thought. LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted October 12, 2017 Author Share Posted October 12, 2017 11 minutes ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said: Maybe you should do research and not be such a spoon fed moron who believes everything he finds on YouTube? Food for thought. I guess all these publications that are talking about it need to do research to right asshole. look you don't like me I get it. But the piling on just to pile on with your faggot friends like slinger is old. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtralettucetomatoe580 Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 Did you just quote a gossip column at me? Lol. Twitter explained why they TEMPORARILY locked her account. Not surprised that doesn’t jive with you. First time anyone has called @Snoslinger my buddy! WE’RE BEST FRIENDS NOW SLINGY!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T1R9sledder Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 2 minutes ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said: Did you just quote a gossip column at me? Lol. Twitter explained why they TEMPORARILY locked her account. Not surprised that doesn’t jive with you. First time anyone has called @Snoslinger my buddy! WE’RE BEST FRIENDS NOW SLINGY!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted October 12, 2017 Author Share Posted October 12, 2017 2 minutes ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said: Did you just quote a gossip column at me? Lol. Twitter explained why they TEMPORARILY locked her account. Not surprised that doesn’t jive with you. First time anyone has called @Snoslinger my buddy! WE’RE BEST FRIENDS NOW SLINGY!!! They can explain away all they want. The fact is multiple news sources are talking about it. The bigger story is the Hypocrisy of the left on this story. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 1 minute ago, jtssrx said: They can explain away all they want. The fact is multiple news sources are talking about it. The bigger story is the Hypocrisy of the left on this story. No, best part is watching Republicans pretend to be better than Democrats on this kind of shit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtralettucetomatoe580 Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 Just now, motonoggin said: No, best part is watching Republicans pretend to be better than Democrats on this kind of shit. It’s different. You wouldn’t understand... lol 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted October 12, 2017 Author Share Posted October 12, 2017 Just now, motonoggin said: No, best part is watching Republicans pretend to be better than Democrats on this kind of shit. I don't think that's happening at all. But I'm not surprised you see that way as even though you seem to be very independent these days you still lean left!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted October 12, 2017 Author Share Posted October 12, 2017 I can give you a couple examples both the Imran Awan and Bob Menendez trials are barley being covered or talked about. If these were Republican scandals they would be all over the news. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 55 minutes ago, jtssrx said: tell Julian Assange dipshit but you believed it and passed it on. which is why you look like a gullible idiot 24/7. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 15 minutes ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said: Did you just quote a gossip column at me? Lol. Twitter explained why they TEMPORARILY locked her account. Not surprised that doesn’t jive with you. First time anyone has called @Snoslinger my buddy! WE’RE BEST FRIENDS NOW SLINGY!!! I thought we always were? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 12 minutes ago, jtssrx said: They can explain away all they want. The fact is multiple news sources are talking about it. The bigger story is the Hypocrisy of the left on this story. who is being a hypocrite on this story, and why? because the way I see it, many on the right just voted in an admitted predator, womanizer, cheater to the WH. so please, explain how we are hypocrits and you and others are not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted October 12, 2017 Author Share Posted October 12, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted October 12, 2017 Author Share Posted October 12, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.