franks pond Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franks pond Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 13 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: what facts am I refusing to believe? farrow went to nbc in the summer, they hesitated. farrow goes elsewhere months later, story released This is why this thread has the title....."the liberal sheep" You're part of that group. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted October 12, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted October 12, 2017 1 minute ago, DriftBusta said: Exactly what laws were broken, and when should we expect the indictments? Lets talk about the uranium and Clinton Foundation now. That seems um, how do we say, something that could be considered pay for play if not treason. Slinger still cannot comprehend the definition of collusion. 1. A meeting alone is not cooperation or conspiracy. 2. How can you cheat or deceive someone if what you are looking for are truthful facts? 3. No agreement ever took place. Want collusion look no further than the Trump dossier. Collision on multiple levels. Now if the meeting had produced something untruthful that the Trump campaign tried to use in exchange for something then without question its collusion. Collusion An agreement between two or more people to defraud a person of his or her rights or to obtain something that is prohibitedby law. A secret arrangement wherein two or more people whose legal interests seemingly conflict conspire to commit Fraud uponanother person; a pact between two people to deceive a court with the purpose of obtaining something that they would notbe able to get through legitimate judicial channels. col·lu·sion kəˈlo͞oZHən/ noun secret or illegal cooperation or conspiracy, especially in order to cheat or deceive others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MiSledder Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 27 minutes ago, Mainecat said: How low can you get when your defending a sexual predator. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted October 12, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted October 12, 2017 What's hilarious is all the comments that were made about Weinstein over the years by celebs that in reality were not sarcasm. They've know for decades he is a piece of shit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 Seems to be a lot of worried trump supporters here. So many deflecting threads. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted October 12, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted October 12, 2017 15 minutes ago, Snake said: I'll defend it, because every man (minus Snot, I guess) has said 1,000x worse. Talk about hypocrisy. I disagree Snake. Not every man goes around saying they use their influence to grab women by the pussy or 1000x's worse. I don't disagree that it wasn't much more than locker room talk but it was still inappropriate but to compare that to what Clinton DID is laughable. I'm an admitted male chauvinist but I don't go around talking about grabbing women inappropriately. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted October 12, 2017 Author Share Posted October 12, 2017 6 minutes ago, Mainecat said: Seems to be a lot of worried trump supporters here. So many deflecting threads. the only ones worried are the libs cause they are getting their ass handed to them AGAIN. Glad you can join them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snoughnut Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 39 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: poor snoputz Poor Shitslinger. Trump is not in jail and he's still POTUS and the best part is, he's still your president. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 9 minutes ago, COPO said: the only ones worried are the libs cause they are getting their ass handed to them AGAIN. Glad you can join them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MiSledder Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 14 minutes ago, Highmark said: I disagree Snake. Not every man goes around saying they use their influence to grab women by the pussy or 1000x's worse. I don't disagree that it wasn't much more than locker room talk but it was still inappropriate but to compare that to what Clinton DID is laughable. I'm an admitted male chauvinist but I don't go around talking about grabbing women inappropriately. Comon, every man has said way worse shit than grab em by the pussy, hell I did yesterday we all have say fucked up shit with our buddies Weinstein is a real dirt bag, slinger does care cause theyre on the same team Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 Just now, MiSledder said: Comon, every man has said way worse shit than grab em by the pussy, hell I did yesterday we all have say fucked up shit with our buddies Weinstein is a real dirt bag, slinger does care cause theyre on the same team The current problem with America lies in that simple statement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 18 minutes ago, Highmark said: I disagree Snake. Not every man goes around saying they use their influence to grab women by the pussy or 1000x's worse. I don't disagree that it wasn't much more than locker room talk but it was still inappropriate but to compare that to what Clinton DID is laughable. I'm an admitted male chauvinist but I don't go around talking about grabbing women inappropriately. Agree to disagree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 Nice deflecting topics by the resident knuckledraggers. Meanwhile ...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted October 12, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted October 12, 2017 1 minute ago, Snake said: Agree to disagree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MiSledder Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 4 minutes ago, Mainecat said: Nice deflecting topics by the resident knuckledraggers. Meanwhile ...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted October 12, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted October 12, 2017 (edited) 9 minutes ago, MiSledder said: Comon, every man has said way worse shit than grab em by the pussy, hell I did yesterday we all have say fucked up shit with our buddies Weinstein is a real dirt bag, slinger does care cause theyre on the same team Sorry I disagree. I don't think most men talk about grabbing women in the pussy WITHOUT their permission. Thats the distinction I'm making. I may say plenty of locker room talk about women but its never without the assumption of it being mutually agreeable to both of us. Edited October 12, 2017 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 Farrow had a lot of material already. In March, he had acquired a damning and much-coveted audio recording in which Weinstein admits to having groped an Italian model. He had interviews with former executives and assistants who’d worked closely with Weinstein who spoke about the culture of harassment and abuse he perpetrated. And now he had someone ready to accuse Weinstein of rape, on camera. But at that moment Farrow was also caught in the pincers of an NBC News edict. He had been told by executives at NBC News that he didn’t have enough reporting to go on air with his Weinstein story, according to four sources, and he had been told by the network to stop reporting on it. NBC tried to put a stop to the interview with the woman accusing Weinstein of rape. The network insisted he not use an NBC News crew for the interview, and neither was he to mention his NBC News affiliation. And so that was how Ronan Farrow wound up paying out of his own pocket for a camera crew to film an interview. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/nbc-harvey-weinstein_us_59de5688e4b0eb18af059685 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T1R9sledder Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 4 minutes ago, Snake said: Farrow had a lot of material already. In March, he had acquired a damning and much-coveted audio recording in which Weinstein admits to having groped an Italian model. He had interviews with former executives and assistants who’d worked closely with Weinstein who spoke about the culture of harassment and abuse he perpetrated. And now he had someone ready to accuse Weinstein of rape, on camera. But at that moment Farrow was also caught in the pincers of an NBC News edict. He had been told by executives at NBC News that he didn’t have enough reporting to go on air with his Weinstein story, according to four sources, and he had been told by the network to stop reporting on it. NBC tried to put a stop to the interview with the woman accusing Weinstein of rape. The network insisted he not use an NBC News crew for the interview, and neither was he to mention his NBC News affiliation. And so that was how Ronan Farrow wound up paying out of his own pocket for a camera crew to film an interview. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/nbc-harvey-weinstein_us_59de5688e4b0eb18af059685 OUCH>>>>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franks pond Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 I think we had a thread once. But I love listing all the connections between shady politicians and the people they hang with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted October 12, 2017 Author Share Posted October 12, 2017 40 years of a monopoly is finally coming crashing down on all the libs.. good Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.