Mainecat Posted August 1, 2017 Author Share Posted August 1, 2017 1 hour ago, racer254 said: That's exactly what the liberal media wants him to think. You run this slow all the time? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted August 1, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 1, 2017 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Mainecat said: Really? you are brainwashed Nope. I just understand how America works these days. No company would be allowed a free pass to pollute. The communities wouldn't stand for it. Edited August 1, 2017 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 2 minutes ago, Highmark said: Nope. I just understand how America works these days. No company would be allowed a free pass to pollute. The communities wouldn't stand for it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted August 1, 2017 Author Share Posted August 1, 2017 4 hours ago, Highmark said: Nope. I just understand how America works these days. No company would be allowed a free pass to pollute. The communities wouldn't stand for it. Then why request no regulations then? Sorta like if your not guilty why ask for a pardon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted August 1, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 1, 2017 29 minutes ago, Mainecat said: Then why request no regulations then? Sorta like if your not guilty why ask for a pardon Simple. Cuts some red tape so it can be built quicker. It doesn't give them a free pass to pollute. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 39 minutes ago, Mainecat said: Then why request no regulations then? Sorta like if your not guilty why ask for a pardon yep, No regulations, they don't have follow anything. FFS you are just illogical. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted August 1, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 1, 2017 12 minutes ago, Highmark said: Simple. Cuts some red tape so it can be built quicker. It doesn't give them a free pass to pollute. 4 minutes ago, racer254 said: yep, No regulations, they don't have follow anything. FFS you are just illogical. So when the DNR and/or science says they need to do this or that or can't build in a certain location because of environmental issues - you'll both agree.. Or take the company line Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 (edited) 3 minutes ago, SnowRider said: So when the DNR and/or science says they need to do this or that or can't build in a certain location because of environmental issues - you'll both agree.. Or take the company line More speculation. Without it you would never have anything to talk about. Maybe they will protect some endangered frog that is only present where this company wants to build. OMG the horror. Edited August 1, 2017 by racer254 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted August 1, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 1, 2017 9 minutes ago, SnowRider said: So when the DNR and/or science says they need to do this or that or can't build in a certain location because of environmental issues - you'll both agree.. Or take the company line I'll can only answer that question when I see the specific examples you are referring too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted August 1, 2017 Author Share Posted August 1, 2017 1 hour ago, Highmark said: Simple. Cuts some red tape so it can be built quicker. It doesn't give them a free pass to pollute. from the story... Gov. Scott Walker's incentives bill would exempt the company from environmental impact statements and state permits for filling wetlands and building on lake beds. Should I enlarge the type more? EXEMPT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 Just now, Highmark said: I'll can only answer that question when I see the specific examples you are referring too. Specific Examples??!?!?! No way. LMAO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 http://fox6now.com/2017/10/04/foxconn-expected-to-locate-plant-in-mount-pleasant/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 On 8/1/2017 at 12:42 PM, Mainecat said: from the story... Gov. Scott Walker's incentives bill would exempt the company from environmental impact statements and state permits for filling wetlands and building on lake beds. Should I enlarge the type more? EXEMPT Lies in larger print become true? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 On 8/1/2017 at 1:42 PM, Mainecat said: from the story... Gov. Scott Walker's incentives bill would exempt the company from environmental impact statements and state permits for filling wetlands and building on lake beds. Should I enlarge the type more? EXEMPT there is nothing there saying they will be allowed any leniency with current environmental laws. that is cutting out the bloodsucking lawyers take is all ...bravo wisconsin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.