Snake Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: they reached an entirely new level of stupid, one I didn't think even existed. think they've plateaued yet? This is NOT THE THREAD to say any thing like that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 1 minute ago, Snake said: This is NOT THE THREAD to say any thing like that. but it is, along with many, many others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted July 13, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 13, 2017 Poor Union Boy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 1 hour ago, Snoslinger said: trump makes the claim that there are several reasons why we should believe Russia doesn't want him in power - one is our big energy "threat" and the other is military. I laugh and call bs because in the scheme of things, our energy exports are a drop in the bucket. snake steps in, says otherwise, supporting the notion that trump is right. tom comes in later without a fucking clue. which is becoming a pattern... Yes but why would Putin want Trump to be president? Plus lowered prices to compete with NG sent on ships hurts Russia more than the US. Keep in mind that for all the talk about Russia being a super power they have a GDP lower than S Korea and even that number relies heavily on gas and oil. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 20 minutes ago, Carlos Danger said: Yes but why would Putin want Trump to be president? Plus lowered prices to compete with NG sent on ships hurts Russia more than the US. Keep in mind that for all the talk about Russia being a super power they have a GDP lower than S Korea and even that number relies heavily on gas and oil. you can't be serious with that question. sanction relief alone is a huge driving force. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 28 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: you can't be serious with that question. sanction relief alone is a huge driving force. Putin had just as much of a chance with Hillary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 8 minutes ago, Carlos Danger said: Putin had just as much of a chance with Hillary. You both don't know that! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 22 minutes ago, Carlos Danger said: Putin had just as much of a chance with Hillary. complete nonsense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 (edited) 2 hours ago, Snoslinger said: snakey do you really think you're fooling anyone with that nonsense? who the fuck put the sanctions on Russia and was going to keep them there, or tighten them even more. putin CLEARLY wanted trump in the WH. How long have said sanctions been in place? Edited July 13, 2017 by AKIQPilot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 6 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: complete nonsense. The fuck you talking about? 3 Billy Bob speeches and a nice check to the Foundation and he could have moved into the Washington Monument. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 1 hour ago, SnowRider said: Poor Union Boy Quote "It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is. If the--if he--if 'is' means is and never has been, that is not--that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 1 hour ago, Snoslinger said: complete nonsense. The Name is Putin not Kreskin, there is no way Russia could have foreseen the outcome of the election. You seem to want to ignore the dealings Clinton had with Russia but certainly Putin knew what he could expect. To put it plainly when has Clinton not been for sale? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 14, 2017 Share Posted July 14, 2017 2 hours ago, Carlos Danger said: The Name is Putin not Kreskin, there is no way Russia could have foreseen the outcome of the election. You seem to want to ignore the dealings Clinton had with Russia but certainly Putin knew what he could expect. To put it plainly when has Clinton not been for sale? are you in on this little "game" with snake, tom, ben and others? putin's disdain for hillary is well known across the globe. to save me some typing, read this... http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/why-putin-hates-hillary-clinton-n617236 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted July 14, 2017 Share Posted July 14, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: are you in on this little "game" with snake, tom, ben and others? putin's disdain for hillary is well known across the globe. to save me some typing, read this... http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/why-putin-hates-hillary-clinton-n617236 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 14, 2017 Share Posted July 14, 2017 there is no other alternative. i simply refuse to believe you are this gullible and naive. take it as a compliment? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted July 14, 2017 Share Posted July 14, 2017 22 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: are you in on this little "game" with snake, tom, ben and others? putin's disdain for hillary is well known across the globe. to save me some typing, read this... http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/why-putin-hates-hillary-clinton-n617236 That article is a bunch of Hooie. Is it established that at the instruction of Putin the DNC was hacked? I am not talking about hearsay as in the article but actual proof? Again the Uranium One deal suggests that Putin could and did work with the Clinton's. Plus it was Obama and Hillary and Kerry that left Syria to the will of Putin to push through or maintain pipelines. As we have discussed before the current and future pipelines going through Syria are really what is at steak for the Russians and to that end Hillary would have been a better choice than Trump if for no other reason than she is the Devil you know. I think it would be fair to say that Hillary would not have changed course in Syria. We have all read the stories where Putin has a personal beef with Obama or Hillary or both but business comes first and Hillary is for sale. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.