Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted March 23, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 23, 2017 Since this seems to be a main topic here and the resident HCL's (Hillary Clit Lickers) are constantly talking about it why don't those believers start posting up actual evidence that this occurred. It would also seem relevant to post up evidence that the Wikileaks releases actually changed voting. I mean did the polls swing? No bullshit "sources tell CNN." Actual evidence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ebsell Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 Like Trumps wire tapping claims the answer is no. They are still looking for excuses why shy lost. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEFF Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 Vince says they're working on it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted March 23, 2017 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 23, 2017 3 minutes ago, JEFF said: Vince says they're working on it? Here is the funny thing. All these intelligence community people willing to leak that there is evidence yet they don't leak the actual evidence. I mean a few simple documents proving it would easily destroy the Trump admin. Does anyone think for a second that if they were available it would not have been leaked to the public already? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 There is none. There will never be any other than speculation and the massive dot connecting of CNN AND MSNBC. And here's what I really want proof of: If there was Russian "collusion", how did it affect the election? Did Orgof and Pachinski stand behind every poll voter and twist their thumbs? Oh shit.....I just let the cat out of the bag.....Maddow is calling for more info. I think I'll take it and tell her I have video. "Sources say...." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmo Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 Sources say it appears as though apparently we don't have any actual evidence Every one of these stories have these gems in them. But they're convinced it's true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEFF Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 My comment in another thread, Exactly. And the suggestive billboards putin and trump installed all over the country. As well as the Trump line of perfume being spread across the country by mig contrails being flown by putin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEFF Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 The left and the media are literally throwing spaghetti against the wall, by the case. Hoping something will stick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 33 minutes ago, Zambroski said: There is none. There will never be any other than speculation and the massive dot connecting of CNN AND MSNBC. And here's what I really want proof of: If there was Russian "collusion", how did it affect the election? Did Orgof and Pachinski stand behind every poll voter and twist their thumbs? Oh shit.....I just let the cat out of the bag.....Maddow is calling for more info. I think I'll take it and tell her I have video. "Sources say...." there's the preview of coming attractions. a dumb fucking question as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 well duh, if the evidence was available right now we wouldn't be having this conversation. christ you clowns are thick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 "how did it affect the election?" sorry but that is damn funny. maybe if your boy won the swing states by huge margins, or the popular vote by the same, you'd have more of a point? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 2 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: "how did it affect the election?" sorry but that is damn funny. maybe if your boy won the swing states by huge margins, or the popular vote by the same, you'd have more of a point? So, you have no answer? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 Just now, Snake said: So, you have no answer? well let's see. I'd bet a paycheck that many of those trump, or 3rd party votes, would have gone to Hillary had all the wikileaks damage not occurred. enough to give Hillary the swing states at least, as the votes were close. here's a question for you - if it didn't do anything, why did they do it, right around the election? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEFF Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: well let's see. I'd bet a paycheck that many of those trump, or 3rd party votes, would have gone to Hillary had all the wikileaks damage not occurred. enough to give Hillary the swing states at least, as the votes were close. here's a question for you - if it didn't do anything, why did they do it, right around the election? So you're saying the timing of the leaks and not the substance of the leaks are what turned people from clinton? You would have rather not seen irrefutable evidence of Clintons corruption.? You're good not knowing all about her? Edited March 23, 2017 by JEFF Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 perfect example of the lack of critical thinking skills in this place. a shitload of incriminating stuff is released by groups of people obviously wanting to affect our election. then some dipshits ask how it affected the election take Russia out of it if you like. why did wikileaks reveal the information? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 Just now, JEFF said: So you're saying the timing of the leaks and not the substance of the leaks are what turned people from clinton? good god. do you have some sort of disorder? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEFF Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: good god. do you have some sort of disorder? I'd say more people here would say that about you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 Just now, JEFF said: I'd say more people here would say that about you. who are much like you so I'm not bothered in the least Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEFF Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 (edited) 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: who are much like you so I'm not bothered in the least It's good to be comfortable with yourself. Edited March 23, 2017 by JEFF Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bussman Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 So no evidence yet? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 10 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: well let's see. I'd bet a paycheck that many of those trump, or 3rd party votes, would have gone to Hillary had all the wikileaks damage not occurred. enough to give Hillary the swing states at least, as the votes were close. here's a question for you - if it didn't do anything, why did they do it, right around the election? snakey? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 1 minute ago, bussman said: So no evidence that everyone is privy to yet? correct Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bussman Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 Wikileaks isn't the Russians Slinger. Good grief. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 1 minute ago, bussman said: Wikileaks isn't the Russians Slinger. Good grief. no shit, but it is relevant to the discussion. or can't you follow along? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.