Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted November 13, 2020 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 13, 2020 (edited) After they found a counting error in favor of the dem candidate. We wanted information, transparency, and we wanted to know that all of the votes were counted, We had been ahead and within a matter of hours, we had a subtraction of 406 votes, which then put us behind our opponent. We did not make any comments about any malicious intent, but we wanted to know what the process was, how that happened," Miller-Meeks said. "While Lucas County was doing their audit, they found that in one of their precincts that there were 217 ballots passed for me that were not reported to the secretary of state on election night and 54 ballots for my opponent. That put me up ahead," Edited November 13, 2020 by Highmark 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted November 13, 2020 Share Posted November 13, 2020 39 minutes ago, Highmark said: After they found a counting error in favor of the dem candidate. We wanted information, transparency, and we wanted to know that all of the votes were counted, We had been ahead and within a matter of hours, we had a subtraction of 406 votes, which then put us behind our opponent. We did not make any comments about any malicious intent, but we wanted to know what the process was, how that happened," Miller-Meeks said. "While Lucas County was doing their audit, they found that in one of their precincts that there were 217 ballots passed for me that were not reported to the secretary of state on election night and 54 ballots for my opponent. That put me up ahead," Funny how that works . There is no reports of wide sored vote fraud how many times have you seen them say that over the last week. And zero mention of the storys all over the countery of off counts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted November 13, 2020 Share Posted November 13, 2020 It there’s no fraud why don’t they just audit the votes in the states in question Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted November 13, 2020 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 13, 2020 (edited) 11 hours ago, jtssrx said: It there’s no fraud why don’t they just audit the votes in the states in question Smart thing for the dems to do would be agree to any machine/vote audits for accuracy or recounts. If correct they can throw it back in the GOP's face. Edited November 13, 2020 by Highmark 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted November 13, 2020 Share Posted November 13, 2020 10 hours ago, Highmark said: Smart thing for the dems to do would be agree to any machine/vote audits for accuracy or recounts. If correct they can throw it back in the GOP's face. Exactly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted November 13, 2020 Share Posted November 13, 2020 14 hours ago, jtssrx said: It there’s no fraud why don’t they just audit the votes in the states in question They aren't? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted November 13, 2020 Share Posted November 13, 2020 1 hour ago, Anler said: They aren't? The democrats are fighting recounts in the courts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roosting Posted November 13, 2020 Share Posted November 13, 2020 it's a self fulfilling prophecy. There will never be any evidence if you don't do the audit. Circular argument if you will. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.