XCR1250 Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 http://www.cnn.com/election/results Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry ginger Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 he better hope the recount only gives her MI and WI, he loses PA he's fired if Stein truly was doing this to make sure numbers are accurate she'd be contesting the states where hillary won by a small margin like NH and NV as well. I'm sure the Clinton supporters funding the recount wouldn't want that though Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 5 minutes ago, Angry ginger said: he better hope the recount only gives her MI and WI, he loses PA he's fired if Stein truly was doing this to make sure numbers are accurate she'd be contesting the states where hillary won by a small margin like NH and NV as well. I'm sure the Clinton supporters funding the recount wouldn't want that though Were there anomalies in those states as well? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XCR1250 Posted November 28, 2016 Author Share Posted November 28, 2016 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Angry ginger said: he better hope the recount only gives her MI and WI, he loses PA he's fired if Stein truly was doing this to make sure numbers are accurate she'd be contesting the states where hillary won by a small margin like NH and NV as well. I'm sure the Clinton supporters funding the recount wouldn't want that though Our machines in Wisconsin are NOT hooked to the internet, to be hacked each machine (1000's) would have to be tampered with individually. Edited November 28, 2016 by XCR1250 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 1 minute ago, motonoggin said: Were there anomalies in those states as well? racer doesn't know the meaning of that word Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 (edited) Just now, Snoslinger said: racer doesn't know the meaning of that word Still waiting for your list? Maybe it has more with just disrupting the EC. But you wouldn't know much about that. Edited November 28, 2016 by racer254 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 Just now, racer254 said: Still waiting for your list? Maybe it has more with just disrupting the EC. But you wouldn't know much about that. what list? there's been plenty of data here, and elsewhere, that explains the reason behind the recounts. yet you keep asking why. a·nom·a·ly əˈnäməlē/ noun noun: anomaly; plural noun: anomalies 1. something that deviates from what is standard, normal, or expected. "there are a number of anomalies in the present system" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 2 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: racer doesn't know the meaning of that word But you've said votefraud is no big deal? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry ginger Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 6 minutes ago, motonoggin said: Were there anomalies in those states as well? well according to trump NH had them and we all know he tells nothing but the truth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 http://www.jill2016.com/recountfaq Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XCR1250 Posted November 28, 2016 Author Share Posted November 28, 2016 Wisconsin officials OK speedy recount, defend tally By Laura Jarrett and Tom LoBianco, CNN Updated 1:46 PM ET, Mon November 28, 2016 Now PlayingScientists urge Clinton to... Trump compares Clinton email probe to Watergate Donald Trump rushed off stage by Secret Service Trump reads letter from Patriot's coach at rally Trump on US officials: 'What a group of losers' Trump's mantra in campaign's final week: Stay on point Audio of Trump praising the Clintons and Democrats Cuomo grills Lewandowski on Clinton email 'hypocrisy' Meet the other Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump Jill Stein responds to Trump's comments Jill Stein raises millions for recount Now Playing Scientists urge Clinton to call for recount Donald Trump's wild ride Trump's challenges in the Middle East Fact checking Trump on crimes by immigrants Trump vs. the tape on Obama and the protester Trump compares Clinton email probe to Watergate Donald Trump rushed off stage by Secret Service Trump reads letter from Patriot's coach at rally Trump on US officials: 'What a group of losers' Trump's mantra in campaign's final week: Stay on point Audio of Trump praising the Clintons and Democrats Cuomo grills Lewandowski on Clinton email 'hypocrisy' Meet the other Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump Jill Stein responds to Trump's comments Jill Stein raises millions for recount Scientists urge Clinton to call for recount Donald Trump's wild ride Trump's challenges in the Middle East Fact checking Trump on crimes by immigrants Trump vs. the tape on Obama and the protester Trump compares Clinton email probe to Watergate Madison, Wisconsin (CNN)Wisconsin election officials pledged Monday they would oversee a fast and fair recount of the presidential vote there, as they race to beat a federal deadline for getting it done, but they declined a request to conduct the new tally by hand. The Wisconsin Elections Commission signed off on a breakneck pace that would have local officials coordinating the recount -- which was sought by the Green Party -- with them this week and starting the actual recount near the end of the week. State officials must have their new tally completed by December 13, according to federal law. Former Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein also announced Monday that her supporters had filed a legal petition on behalf of 100 voters in Pennsylvania seeking a recount in that state. "After a presidential election tarnished by the use of outdated and unreliable machines and accusations of irregularities and hacks, people of all political persuasions are asking if our election results are reliable. We must recount the votes so we can build trust in our election system," Stein said in a statement. In Wisconsin, the election panel shot down a request from Stein that the ballots be counted by hand, although the Green Party leader intends to go to court to override that decision. "If nothing else, this is going to give us a very good audit, it's going to re-assure Wisconsin voters that we have a fair system, that we're not counting illegal votes," said Elections Commission chairman Mark Thomsen. He strongly defended the vote count. "To say we didn't count them correctly the first time... that somehow illegal votes were counted... is really inappropriate," Thomsen said. "I don't think we'll find in this that our fellow citizens counted these votes (in)accurately -- going to reassure -- not counting illegal votes ... We're not counting dead people's votes." Wisconsin elections administrator Mike Haas said that if the recount battle moves to the courts, after the commission announces the new tally, it will be out of the commission's hands. But he cast doubt on it ever reaching the level of the 2000 recount. "This is certainly not Bush v. Gore," Haas said. "The likelihood of an appeal is certainly different from the context of that case." Haas noted that Bush v. Gore -- there was a 537-vote margin -- was decided by the Supreme Court on the 35th day after the 2000 election. The fight in Wisconsin is now likely to move to smaller venues throughout Wisconsin now as lawyers for Stein, Democrat Hillary Clinton and the Republican Party prepare to argue just how the votes are counted here in the next two weeks. Stein and the Green Party have been leading the fight for a recount here, in Wisconsin, and in Pennsylvania and Michigan. Meanwhile, the former campaign counsel for Hillary Clinton announced over the weekend they would participate in the recount. That, and allegations that hackers threw the election, has had President-elect Donald Trump blasting away at the effort -- dubbing it a scam, and firing off his own allegations of voter fraud in states Clinton won. Thomsen, a Democrat, fired back at Trump Monday and accused him of undermining the faith in American elections. "Someone has the bully pulpit and somebody has impact on our citizens right to trust what happens down the block at the polling places and you know. I've never seen this kind of attack on poll workers, and how this system works," Thomsen said. It appears unlikely that the recount in Wisconsin could overturn the results of the election -- Clinton lost Wisconsin by more than 20,000 votes, according to the current tally. But the battle is likely to keep eyes trained on the narrow margins of victory Trump eked out just three weeks ago to win the White House. The Wisconsin commissioners also said the recount could end up costing $1 million or more -- a number that Stein had easily surpassed as of Monday morning, with $6.3 million raised so far. Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, a former Trump GOP primary opponent who later helped deliver the state for him, tweeted Monday, "We made it easy to vote, hard to cheat in WI elections. Supporters of #Recount2016 were against our Voter ID initiatives." Follow Governor Walker ✔@GovWalker We made it easy to vote, hard to cheat in WI elections. Supporters of #Recount2016 were against our Voter ID initiatives. 10:44 AM - 28 Nov 2016 251251 Retweets 323323 likes Stein and her supporters have cited the potential that the state's voting machines may have been hacked in their request for the recount, although they have not cited any evidence that they were hacked. Elections officials were adamant that a hack was all but impossible. Haas said that each machine is isolated from the internet and that any hacker would have to physically tamper with the equipment, one by one. "We've said many times there are a number of reasons of why we are skeptical of claims that voting equipment is not working correctly or is being tampered with," Haas said. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 They have to get enough electoral votes to try and drop trump under 270. Disruption is the name of the game. Nothing more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 2 minutes ago, racer254 said: They have to get enough electoral votes to try and drop trump under 270. Disruption is the name of the game. Nothing more. A little disruption is long overdue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bussman Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 Just when the left couldn't get any more desparate and pathetic Love it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 1 minute ago, bussman said: Just when the left couldn't get any more desparate and pathetic Love it Insuring a fair election is neither. Do you even care about the only voice you're given in the system? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 2 minutes ago, motonoggin said: Insuring a fair election is neither. Do you even care about the only voice you're given in the system? what's comical are the clowns who'd have supported trump's claims of "rigged voting" in a heartbeat, taken it to the streets upon command, now getting uptight at examining some authentic anomalies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bussman Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 3 minutes ago, motonoggin said: Insuring a fair election is neither. Do you even care about the only voice you're given in the system? I live in Illinois, I don't have a voice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bussman Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: what's comical are the clowns who'd have supported trump's claims of "rigged voting" in a heartbeat, taken it to the streets upon command, now getting uptight at examining some authentic anomalies. What's even more comical is your typical partisan 180 on this yourself. You're an embarrassment to your own self SnoClown. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted November 28, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 28, 2016 19 minutes ago, motonoggin said: Insuring a fair election is neither. Do you even care about the only voice you're given in the system? A vote is far from the only voice one has. You can run for office, work for a campaign, donate money just to name a few. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 28 minutes ago, bussman said: What's even more comical is your typical partisan 180 on this yourself. You're an embarrassment to your own self SnoClown. 180 on what? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted November 28, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 28, 2016 53 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: what list? there's been plenty of data here, and elsewhere, that explains the reason behind the recounts. yet you keep asking why. a·nom·a·ly əˈnäməlē/ noun noun: anomaly; plural noun: anomalies 1. something that deviates from what is standard, normal, or expected. "there are a number of anomalies in the present system" So where is the proof of these "'anomalies?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmo Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 9 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: 180 on what? You're so predictable 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 47 minutes ago, motonoggin said: Insuring a fair election is neither. Do you even care about the only voice you're given in the system? You have to be the most naive, pathetic excuse for an anarchist I have ever seen. Ain't no one involved give a rat's ass about the vote. Counties in Michigan don't even have to hand tally the votes.. just re-add the totals. Jill gonna sue? Gonna need more money BOSS! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 Lmao. You chodes sound upset. Don't worry, emporer Trump will retain the crown. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 39 minutes ago, Edmo said: You're so predictable maybe you can answer for buss? he's implying I did a 180 on "this". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.