xtralettucetomatoe580 Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 49 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: it's a case of comey covering his ass with the repukes. if he does nothing until after the election, he gets raked over the coals for being part of this "rigged system". he should have done it by the book and not said a fucking word until the fbi knew what they have. but, he does have some repuke blood in him, and can't help himself. I tend to agree with you, but at the same time it takes a huge level of hackery to do so with 10 days left. I don't know if he has that level of hackery in him being selected by the Obama Admin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 (edited) 9 minutes ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said: I tend to agree with you, but at the same time it takes a huge level of hackery to do so with 10 days left. I don't know if he has that level of hackery in him being selected by the Obama Admin. imo it's yet another case of a moderate "caving" to the far right. don't forget this clown went against protocol back in july, by throwing out his opinions, as well. hopefully his career ends soon. Edited October 29, 2016 by Snoslinger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtralettucetomatoe580 Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 4 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: imo it's yet another case of a moderate "caving" to the far right. don't forget this clown went against protocol back in july as well. hopefully his career ends soon. I agree with you, I just hope you are wrong. What does that say about those we put in positions to be non-partisan? Just a shitty situation. For the integrity of our top LEO's I hope there is something there... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 i'm getting a kick out of all the trump surrogates acting like they found gold, some even comparing to watergate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtralettucetomatoe580 Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 6 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: i'm getting a kick out of all the trump surrogates acting like they found gold, some even comparing to watergate Well they are idiots. But that being said, what if there is something there? This could be the bigger than Watergate considering the gravity and timing.. It could determine an election. That alone deserves some attention Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 3 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: i'm getting a kick out of all the trump surrogates acting like they found gold, some even comparing to watergate What dirt did the republicans gain from watergate???? It was all about the coverup, this is way fucking worse you socialist fucking know NOTHING clown Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 6 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: imo it's yet another case of a moderate "caving" to the far right. don't forget this clown went against protocol back in july, by throwing out his opinions, as well. hopefully his career ends soon. so he is caving to the far right by officially looking in to evidence that was not turned over as required before ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 1 minute ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said: Well they are idiots. But that being said, what if there is something there? This could be the bigger than Watergate considering the gravity and timing.. It could determine an election. That alone deserves some attention like what? what do you think it'd take for people to change their minds on clinton vs trump? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 3 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: like what? what do you think it'd take for people to change their minds on clinton vs trump? I think it would take her killing a baby on live tv with her bare hands to change the minds of morons like you ......but for people with functioning brains it would take much less Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 3 minutes ago, Ez ryder said: so he is caving to the far right by officially looking in to evidence that was not turned over as required before ? no. he's caving by throwing a "box" out there that the repugs can fill with anything they want 11 days before an election. nobody, at least not me, is saying the these e-mails should be ignored. it's the timing, and the fact comey is breaking tradition, maybe even the law. do you realize they are not supposed to do shit like he has just done 60 days before an election? trump and fellow repukes have been breathing down this guy's neck since july, and it's my opinion he caved to them, just like ryan, chaffetz, and many others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtralettucetomatoe580 Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 12 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: like what? what do you think it'd take for people to change their minds on clinton vs trump? I don't know. Ben is right. Her murdering someone probably. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 3 minutes ago, f7ben said: I think it would take her killing a baby on live tv with her bare hands to change the minds of morons like you ......but for people with functioning brains it would take much less Killing a baby still wouldn't change Snots vote Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 Just now, Snoslinger said: no. he's caving by throwing a "box" out there that the repugs can fill with anything they want 11 days before an election. nobody, at least not me, is saying the these e-mails should be ignored. it's the timing, and the fact comey is breaking tradition, maybe even the law. do you realize they are not supposed to do shit like he has just done 60 days before an election? trump and fellow repukes have been breathing down this guy's neck since july, and it's my opinion he caved to them, just like ryan, chaffetz, and many others. well then I guess she should not have attempted to hide the mail then ha? do u think if u were running for school board and new evidence came to light on a crime u may have committed they would not purp walk u straight to a holding cell during your speech Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 6 minutes ago, f7ben said: I think it would take her killing a baby on live tv with her bare hands to change the minds of morons like you ......but for people with functioning brains it would take much less morning conspiracy ben. i'm surpised you're not thinking this is a clinton/msm conspiracy, designed to shed light on nothing, and away from wikileaks material. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elkhorn Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 (edited) 23 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: i'm getting a kick out of all the trump surrogates acting like they found gold, some even comparing to watergate Newsflash Skippy the guys that covered Watergate are the ones comparing it to Watergate pay attention . This will do plenty of damage for her so don't act like it's not a big deal Edited October 29, 2016 by Elkhorn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: morning conspiracy ben. i'm surpised you're not thinking this is a clinton/msm conspiracy, designed to shed light on nothing, and away from wikileaks material. I think Gaygrabs10dicks has got it right. The FBI knows about something pretty bad and they think wikileaks knows too and will expose them as having covered for Hillary. This is convenient for them to claim they found it as part of another investigation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 1 minute ago, Ez ryder said: well then I guess she should not have attempted to hide the mail then ha? do u think if u were running for school board and new evidence came to light on a crime u may have committed they would not purp walk u straight to a holding cell during your speech tell me something, and i'd like an honest answer. if a group of people had been harassing you for 30 years, making up all kinds of shit, and looking for ANYTHING to inflict damage....... would you release all your e-mails to them, even if the group were pretending to be interested in one topic only? think of all the magical dots that could have been "connected" with some of her e-mail correspondence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 3 minutes ago, Elkhorn said: Newsflash Skippy the guys that covered Watergate are the ones comparing it to Watergate pay attention . This will do plenty of damage for her so don't act like it's not a big deal are they trump supporters? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: tell me something, and i'd like an honest answer. if a group of people had been harassing you for 30 years, making up all kinds of shit, and looking for ANYTHING to inflict damage....... would you release all your e-mails to them, even if the group were pretending to be interested in one topic only? think of all the magical dots that could have been "connected" with some of her e-mail correspondence. Since when has she been harassed for 30yrs? You are really reaching. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtralettucetomatoe580 Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 6 minutes ago, f7ben said: I think Gaygrabs10dicks has got it right. The FBI knows about something pretty bad and they think wikileaks knows too and will expose them as having covered for Hillary. This is convenient for them to claim they found it as part of another investigation Going to be a crazy couple of weeks... 4 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: tell me something, and i'd like an honest answer. if a group of people had been harassing you for 30 years, making up all kinds of shit, and looking for ANYTHING to inflict damage....... would you release all your e-mails to them, even if the group were pretending to be interested in one topic only? think of all the magical dots that could have been "connected" with some of her e-mail correspondence. No, but if you are running for office it must be done. Obviously that goes for both sides of the aisle... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elkhorn Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: are they trump supporters? I don't know, who are the two names that you associate with Watergate when it comes to reporters? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 3 minutes ago, f7ben said: I think Gaygrabs10dicks has got it right. The FBI knows about something pretty bad and they think wikileaks knows too and will expose them as having covered for Hillary. This is convenient for them to claim they found it as part of another investigation riiiight, and wikileaks has really bad timing and waited this late in the game, after everyone's mind is made up, millions have already voted, etc. gmafb. unfortunately you're back to your former ways .7ben. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: riiiight, and wikileaks has really bad timing and waited this late in the game, after everyone's mind is made up, millions have already voted, etc. gmafb. unfortunately you're back to your former ways .7ben. I trust Assange 10000x more than any person in our government or media ....he claims he has something serious. That is all I know Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 5 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: tell me something, and i'd like an honest answer. if a group of people had been harassing you for 30 years, making up all kinds of shit, and looking for ANYTHING to inflict damage....... would you release all your e-mails to them, even if the group were pretending to be interested in one topic only? think of all the magical dots that could have been "connected" with some of her e-mail correspondence. it is not a group of people it is the FBI . and if I was not a pile of shit and did nothing wrong I would be telling every one I knew to turn over all the stuff I had sent tehm to clear this shit up ASAP. but some people have shit to hide then this is what happens Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtralettucetomatoe580 Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 5 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: riiiight, and wikileaks has really bad timing and waited this late in the game, after everyone's mind is made up, millions have already voted, etc. gmafb. unfortunately you're back to your former ways .7ben. Wikileaks by nature would only wait until now. Have to ask why an extreme left leaning organization would want to take this election from Hillary? Would you admit there is a possibility of merit to their claims? Would that change your mind? My question is for you: What would Wikileaks have to come out with (or the FBI) that would involve you not voting for Clinton? I seriously would like to know. I think it would interesting to get your perspective on this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.