Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted November 22, 2020 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 22, 2020 (edited) 7 minutes ago, FrankieJames7 said: The bet 500 thing is beyond old You good for it? You can make payments Edited November 22, 2020 by SnowRider Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frenchy Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 4 minutes ago, Carlos Danger said: That is their plan no? higher courts have no requirement to hear appeals to ridiculous claims that were immediately dismissed in lower courts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member ViperGTS/Z1 Posted November 22, 2020 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 22, 2020 12 minutes ago, DriftBusta said: Let the record show, that he accepted the bet. You lose, give him a hundo. He loses, he owes you just under 10 grand Well played. 100 is worth it just to make him shutup about all this betting nonsense..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted November 22, 2020 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 22, 2020 @DriftBusta 5:1? My $500 to your $100 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin_dry Posted November 22, 2020 Author Share Posted November 22, 2020 An impeccable legal team trump has there. Brann wrote on Saturday that Trump’s attorneys had haphazardly stitched this allegation together “like Frankenstein’s Monster” in an attempt to avoid unfavorable legal precedent. In trying to depict “ballot curing” as illegal, Trump’s attorneys misstated a decision by Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court. Brann noted in his order on Saturday that the court had in fact “declined to explicitly answer whether such a policy is necessarily forbidden.” 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin_dry Posted November 22, 2020 Author Share Posted November 22, 2020 5 minutes ago, frenchy said: higher courts have no requirement to hear appeals to ridiculous claims that were immediately dismissed in lower courts. They are strategically hiding evidence from the lower courts. Happens all the time. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted November 22, 2020 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 22, 2020 19 minutes ago, DriftBusta said: Let the record show, that he accepted the bet. You lose, give him a hundo. He loses, he owes you just under 10 grand Well played. Take the same odds and bet? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrankieJames7 Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 3 minutes ago, spin_dry said: An impeccable legal team trump has there. Brann wrote on Saturday that Trump’s attorneys had haphazardly stitched this allegation together “like Frankenstein’s Monster” in an attempt to avoid unfavorable legal precedent. In trying to depict “ballot curing” as illegal, Trump’s attorneys misstated a decision by Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court. Brann noted in his order on Saturday that the court had in fact “declined to explicitly answer whether such a policy is necessarily forbidden.” Obama appointed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted November 22, 2020 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 22, 2020 Looks like a strong case BREAKING: Federal judge dismisses Trump campaign lawsuit in Pennsylvania. “In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its 6th most populated state," the judge wrote. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin_dry Posted November 22, 2020 Author Share Posted November 22, 2020 1 minute ago, FrankieJames7 said: Obama appointed Heard you the first two times, little guy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 8 minutes ago, frenchy said: higher courts have no requirement to hear appeals to ridiculous claims that were immediately dismissed in lower courts. Look no matter what the media says Trump does have a case. The argument is that they did not follow state election laws is valid no matter your opinion of Trump. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrankieJames7 Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 Just now, spin_dry said: Heard you the first two times, little guy. U keep posting the same bs stories Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSFB Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 17 minutes ago, Carlos Danger said: That is their plan no? tRuSt ThE pLaN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted November 22, 2020 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 22, 2020 1 minute ago, Carlos Danger said: Look no matter what the media says Trump does have a case. The argument is that they did not follow state election laws is valid no matter your opinion of Trump. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin_dry Posted November 22, 2020 Author Share Posted November 22, 2020 Just now, FrankieJames7 said: U keep posting the same bs stories Frankie, did it matter who appointed your judge? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 Just now, SSFB said: tRuSt ThE pLaN At this point Biden would be a gift for conservatives but I am willing to let this play out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrankieJames7 Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 Just now, spin_dry said: Frankie, did it matter who appointed your judge? No I was guilty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin_dry Posted November 22, 2020 Author Share Posted November 22, 2020 Just now, FrankieJames7 said: No I was guilty That’s correct. It doesn’t matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrankieJames7 Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 Just now, spin_dry said: That’s correct. It doesn’t matter. It does in P A tho Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frenchy Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 Just now, Carlos Danger said: Look no matter what the media says Trump does have a case. The argument is that they did not follow state election laws is valid no matter your opinion of Trump. not seeing it but what I am seeing is a direct constitutional violation in Trump encroaching on state rights in state elections he lost. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted November 22, 2020 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 22, 2020 1 minute ago, Carlos Danger said: At this point Biden would be a gift for conservatives but I am willing to let this play out. You’re a MAGA so you’re not a conservative. You’re moronic dumb fuck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin_dry Posted November 22, 2020 Author Share Posted November 22, 2020 1 minute ago, Carlos Danger said: At this point Biden would be a gift for conservatives but I am willing to let this play out. Your willing to let this play out? Oh really? I didn’t know anyone had a choice in the matter? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrankieJames7 Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 Just now, SnowRider said: You’re a MAGA so you’re not a conservative. You’re moronic dumb fuck Ur a faggot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin_dry Posted November 22, 2020 Author Share Posted November 22, 2020 1 minute ago, frenchy said: not seeing it but what I am seeing is a direct constitutional violation in Trump encroaching on state rights in state elections he lost. He’s being sued for that at the moment. And they have a good case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrankieJames7 Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 1 minute ago, spin_dry said: He’s being sued for that at the moment. And they have a good case. Depends on the judge Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.